Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01227889
Registration number
NCT01227889
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/10/2010
Date registered
25/10/2010
Date last updated
4/10/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study Comparing GSK2118436 to Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Previously Untreated Subjects With BRAF Mutation Positive Advanced (Stage III) or Metastatic (Stage IV) Melanoma
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase III Randomized, Open-label Study Comparing GSK2118436 to Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Previously Untreated Subjects With BRAF Mutation Positive Advanced (Stage III) or Metastatic (Stage IV) Melanoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
113683
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Malignant melanoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - GSK2118436
Treatment: Drugs - Dacarbazine (DTIC)
Experimental: GSK2118436 - Subjects in this arm will receive GSK2118436 150 mg twice daily.
Active comparator: Dacarbazine (DTIC) - Subjects will receive intravenous dacarbazine (DTIC) 1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks
Experimental: Crossover - Subjects who initially receive DTIC will be allowed to receive GSK2118436 after initial progression.
Treatment: Drugs: GSK2118436
150 mg twice daily
Treatment: Drugs: Dacarbazine (DTIC)
Intravenous (IV), 1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until initial progression
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on radiographic or photographic evidence, and assessments were made by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 millimeters (mm). For participants who did not progress or die, PFS was censored at the date of last contact. Data are presented as median and 96% confidence interval.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Time interval between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause (up to 9.9 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on radiographic or photographic evidence, and assessments were made by an independent radiologist according to RECIST version 1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. For participants who did not progress or die, PFS was censored at the date of last contact.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Time interval between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression or the date of death due to any cause (up to 9.9 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Overall survival is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, overall survival was censored at the date of last contact.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Time interval between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to 22.1 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Confirmed Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator: Randomized Phase
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
A participant was defined as a responder if he/she achieved either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters \[e.g., percent change from Baseline\]). Response was evaluated by an investigator per RECIST, version 1.1. A participant without a post-Baseline assessment of response was considered a non-responder. Confirmation, per RECIST version 1.1, requires a confimatory disease assessment of CR or PR at least 28 days after the initial disease assessment of CR or PR.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From randomization until the first documented evidence of a confirmed complete response or partial response (median of 6.6 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed CR or PR as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
A participant was defined as a responder if he/she achieved either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters \[e.g., percent change from Baseline\]). Response was evaluated by an independent radiologist per RECIST, version 1.1. A participant without a post-Baseline assessment of response was considered a non-responder. Confirmation, per RECIST version 1.1, requires a confimatory disease assessment of CR or PR at least 28 days after the initial disease assessment of CR or PR.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From randomization until the first documented evidence of a confirmed complete response or partial response (median of 12.0 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator: Randomized Phase
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Duration of response for participants with either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters \[e.g., percent change from Baseline\]) was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of a PR or CR until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Time from the first documented evidence of PR or CR until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause (up to 65.6 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Duration of Response as Assessed by an Independent Radiologist: Randomized Phase
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Duration of response for participants with either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters \[e.g., percent change from Baseline\]) was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of a PR or CR until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. NA indicates that data is not available.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Time from the first documented evidence of PR or CR until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause (up to 7.4 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS2) as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
PFS2 is defined as the time from the first dose of GSK2118436, in participants randomized to DTIC who crossed over to GSK2118436 after initial progression, to the earliest date of radiographic or photographic disease progression or death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on radiographic or photographic evidence, and assessments were made by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. For participants who did not progress or die, PFS was censored at the date of last contact.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Time from first dose of GSK2118436 in participants who crossover after initial progression to the earliest date of radiographical or photographical PD or death due to any cause (up to 6.4 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Confirmed Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
A participant was defined as a responder if he/she achieved either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters \[e.g., percent change from Baseline\]). Response was evaluated by an investigator per RECIST, version 1.1. A participant without a post-Baseline assessment of response was considered a non-responder. Confirmation, per RECIST version 1.1, requires a confimatory disease assessment of CR or PR at least 28 days after the initial disease assessment of CR or PR.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From randomization until the first documented evidence of a confirmed complete response or partial response (up to 6.4 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator: Crossover Phase
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Duration of response for participants with either a CR (the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis.) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum of the diameters \[e.g., percent change from Baseline\]) was defined as the time from the first documented evidence of a PR or CR until the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started (e.g., percent change from nadir, where nadir is defined as the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment start). In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Time from the first documented evidence of PR or CR until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause (up to 6.4 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants With Non-melanoma Skin Lesions: Randomized Phase
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Dermatological examinations were performed by the investigator, or at the discretion of the investigator, referred to a dermatologist. The number of participants with non-melanoma skin lessions was assessed from the time of Screening until study completion or discontinuation from the study for any reason.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From Screening until study completion or discontinuation from the study (up to 9.9 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Agreement Rate for V600E Mutation Validation of the BRAF Mutation Assay
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Analytical and clinical validation of the companion diagnostic (cDx) assay was performed to determine the extent of agreement between the bioMerieux cDx assay (THxID BRAF Assay) and the Clinical Trial Assay (CTA) to detect BRAF mutations to determine participant eligibility into the study. Skin tissue samples collected at the Screening visit were used for this analysis. Multiple specimen per participant were analyzed.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Screening
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Adults at least 18 years of age
* Has advanced (unresectable Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma that is BRAF mutation positive (V600E)
* Is treatment naive for advanced (unresectable) or metastatic melanoma, with the exception of Interleukin 2 (IL-2) which is allowed.
* Has measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
* Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 14 days prior to the first dose of study treatment.
* Women with reproductive potential must be willing to practice acceptable methods of birth control during the study and for up to 4 weeks after the last dose of study medication.
* Men with reproductive potential must be willing to practice acceptable methods of birth control during the study and for up to 16 weeks after the last dose of study medication.
* Must have adequate organ function.
* Must have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-1.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Currently receiving cancer therapy (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, biologic therapy or surgery).
* Evidence of active central nervous system (CNS) disease.
* Previous treatment for metastatic melanoma, including treatment with BRAF or MEK inhibitor.
* A history of other malignancy. Subjects who have been disease-free for 5 years or subjects with a history of complete resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated in situ carcinoma are eligible.
* History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection.
* Certain cardiac abnormalities
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
23/12/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/09/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
251
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Southport
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4215 - Southport
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Bordeaux
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Marseille Cedex 5
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Nice
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Paris cedex 18
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Reims
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Villejuif
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Baden-Wuerttemberg
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Rheinland-Pfalz
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Saarland
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Sachsen-Anhalt
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Schleswig-Holstein
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Thueringen
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Gyor
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Miskolc
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Pecs
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Cork
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Dublin
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Galway
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Friuli-Venezia-Giulia
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Lazio
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Liguria
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Toscana
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Umbria
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Veneto
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Brzozow
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Konin
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Slupsk
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Kazan
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Ryazan
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
St. Petersburg
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Stavropol
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Badalona
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Pamplona
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
GlaxoSmithKline
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
BRF113683 is a Phase III, randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of GSK2118436 to dacarbazine (DTIC), in subjects with BRAF mutant advanced (Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma. Subjects will be randomized to receive 150 mg of GSK2118436 twice daily or 1000 mg/m2 DTIC every 3 weeks and continue on treatment until disease progression, death, or unacceptable adverse event. Subjects who progress on DTIC will be allowed to crossover to an optional extension arm of the study to receive GSK2118436.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01227889
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, Jouary T, Gutzmer R, Millward M, Rutkowski P, Blank CU, Miller WH Jr, Kaempgen E, Martin-Algarra S, Karaszewska B, Mauch C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Martin AM, Swann S, Haney P, Mirakhur B, Guckert ME, Goodman V, Chapman PB. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):358-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60868-X. Epub 2012 Jun 25. Hauschild A, Ascierto PA, Schadendorf D, Grob JJ, Ribas A, Kiecker F, Dutriaux C, Demidov LV, Lebbe C, Rutkowski P, Blank CU, Gutzmer R, Millward M, Kefford R, Haas T, D'Amelio A Jr, Gasal E, Mookerjee B, Chapman PB. Long-term outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma receiving dabrafenib monotherapy: Analysis from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;125:114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.033. Santiago-Walker A, Gagnon R, Mazumdar J, Casey M, Long GV, Schadendorf D, Flaherty K, Kefford R, Hauschild A, Hwu P, Haney P, O'Hagan A, Carver J, Goodman V, Legos J, Martin AM. Correlation of BRAF Mutation Status in Circulating-Free DNA and Tumor and Association with Clinical Outcome across Four BRAFi and MEKi Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 1;22(3):567-74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0321. Epub 2015 Oct 7. Latimer NR, Abrams KR, Amonkar MM, Stapelkamp C, Swann RS. Adjusting for the Confounding Effects of Treatment Switching-The BREAK-3 Trial: Dabrafenib Versus Dacarbazine. Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):798-805. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0429. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Grob JJ, Amonkar MM, Martin-Algarra S, Demidov LV, Goodman V, Grotzinger K, Haney P, Kampgen E, Karaszewska B, Mauch C, Miller WH Jr, Millward M, Mirakhur B, Rutkowski P, Chiarion-Sileni V, Swann S, Hauschild A. Patient perception of the benefit of a BRAF inhibitor in metastatic melanoma: quality-of-life analyses of the BREAK-3 study comparing dabrafenib with dacarbazine. Ann Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1428-1436. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu154. Epub 2014 Apr 25. Ouellet D, Gibiansky E, Leonowens C, O'Hagan A, Haney P, Switzky J, Goodman VL. Population pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor: effect of dose, time, covariates, and relationship with its metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;54(6):696-706. doi: 10.1002/jcph.263. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
GSK Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
GlaxoSmithKline
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01227889
Download to PDF