Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01292603
Registration number
NCT01292603
Ethics application status
Date submitted
8/02/2011
Date registered
9/02/2011
Date last updated
19/12/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study to Compare Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous MabThera (Rituximab) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Query!
Scientific title
An Adaptive, Comparative, Randomized, Parallel-group, Multi Center, Phase Ib Study of Subcutaneous (SC) Rituximab Versus Intravenous (IV) Rituximab Both in Combination With Chemotherapy (Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide), in Patients With Previously Untreated CLL
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2010-021380-32
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
BO25341
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Leukaemia - Acute leukaemia
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Leukaemia - Chronic leukaemia
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Children's - Leukaemia & Lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Cyclophosphamide
Treatment: Drugs - Fludarabine
Treatment: Drugs - rituximab [MabThera]
Treatment: Drugs - rituximab [MabThera]
Treatment: Drugs - rituximab [MabThera]
Experimental: 1 -
Experimental: 2 -
Experimental: 3 -
Treatment: Drugs: Cyclophosphamide
Days 1-3 or Days 1-5 of cycles 1-6
Treatment: Drugs: Fludarabine
Days 1-3 or Days 1-5 of cycles 1-6
Treatment: Drugs: rituximab [MabThera]
One cycle of intravenous MabThera, followed by 5 cycles of subcutaneous MabThera
Treatment: Drugs: rituximab [MabThera]
After 4 cycles of intravenous MabThera without experiencing grade 3 or 4 infusion-related reactions. patients will receive 1 additional cycle of intravenous MabThera and 1 cycle of subcutaneous MabThera.
Treatment: Drugs: rituximab [MabThera]
6 cycles of intravenous MabThera
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Part 1: Subcutaneous Rituximab Dose Resulting in Trough Concentration (Ctrough) Levels Non-Inferior to Intravenous Rituximab
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Ctrough is defined as the trough or minimum serum concentration. Pharmacokinetic parameters for rituximab were assessed during Cycles 5 (IV rituximab) and 6 (SC rituximab). Rituximab pharmacokinetic (PK) data from Part 1 were integrated into a population PK model using parametric, nonlinear, mixed-effects modelling. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 administered once every 4 weeks was compared to fixed doses of rituximab SC between 1400 mg and 1870 mg. The dose selection was performed on Ctrough concentrations at Cycle 5 (pre-dose Cycle 6). A test of the probability of success was applied to each of the 100 replicates, and the percentage of replicates with a positive test corresponded to the probability of success of the trial.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Pre-dose and post-dose (15 minutes to end of infusion) on Day 1 and on Days 2, 5, 11 and 15 of Cycle 5 and Pre-dose, Post-dose on Days 2, 3, 5,11, 15 and 29 of Cycle 6; Pre-dose was taken 2 hours prior rituximab dose
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Part 2: Rituximab C Trough Levels at Cycle 5
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Ctrough is defined as the trough or minimum serum concentration in a given cycle of treatment. The objective of Part 2 was to demonstrate the comparability of the observed Ctrough of rituximab SC 1600 mg and rituximab IV 500 mg/m2 at Cycle 5, as assessed by a non-inferiority test with a lower boundary of at least 0.8 for the 90% CI.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
+/- 25hours around the 28th day post the 5th Cycle of Rituximab administration
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Part 2: Observed Area Under the Serum Concentration-Curve (AUC) of Rituximab at Cycle 6
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
AUC values were calculated by numerical integration using the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC levels were analyzed using the model below: Ln(AUC) = µ + ti + BlTLij + eij wherein, Ln is the natural log, µ denotes the overall mean effect, ti the effect in each treatment group, BlTLij the tumor load at baseline for each patient and eij a random error variable with normal distribution and mean 0. The treatment effect therein was based on a contrast statement in the model to calculate 90 % confidence intervals for ln(AUC SC)- ln(AUC IV).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Rituximab IV arm: pre-dose, post-dose and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6; Rituximab SC arm: pre-dose, and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Part 2: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab at Cycle 6
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Cmax was obtained directly from the measured concentration-time curves. The concentration-time curve is the result of time points of blood sampling and its measured concentration of rituximab in the blood samplings.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Rituximab IV arm: pre-dose, post-dose and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6; Rituximab SC arm: pre-dose, and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Part 2: Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Rituximab at Cycle 6
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Multiple blood samples were obtained at pre-dose, post-dose and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6 in Rituximab IV arm, and at pre-dose, and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6 in Rituximab SC arm and time to peak plasma concentration of rituximab was determined.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Rituximab IV arm: pre-dose, post-dose and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6; Rituximab SC arm: pre-dose, and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Part 2: Terminal Half-Life of Rituximab at Cycle 6
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The terminal half-life (t1/2) of rituximab is defined as the time required for the plasma concentration of rituximab to reach half of its original concentration.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Rituximab IV arm: pre-dose, post-dose and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6; Rituximab SC arm: pre-dose, and on Days 2, 3, 8 ,15, 29 of Cycle 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Part 1: Percentage of Participants and Nurses Recording a Preference For Either SC or IV Administration
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
In part 1 of the trial, upon completion of dosing in cycle 6, participants and their treating nurses were asked whether they have a preference of dosing route, IV vs SC
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Days 4 to 5 in Cycle 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Part 2: Physician/Nurse Opinion on Time Savings With Rituximab SC Compared With Rituximab IV
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Physicians and nurses who administered rituximab were asked to answer the following question: " If used in routine practice, on average, how much staff time could be saved with each administration of rituximab SC as compared to rituximab IV? (Please do not consider the time needed for the first IV administration, consider only the subsequent ones)". The number of nurses that responded for both the IV and SC arms was 70. The number of physicians that responded for the IV and SC arms were 78 and 81 respectively.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Days 4-5 in Cycle 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Part 2: Physician/Nurse Opinion on Convenience of Rituximab SC Compared With Rituximab IV
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Physicians and nurses who administered rituximab were asked to answer the following question: "Which formulation of rituximab (SC or IV) do you think is more convenient?" with pre-specified responses as below. Percentage of participants with specified answers were reported. The number of nurses that responded for both the IV and SC arms was 70. The number of physicians that responded for the IV and SC arms were 78 and 81 respectively.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Days 4-5 in Cycle 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Blood samples for the assessment of antibodies against rituximab (HACAs) were drawn pre-dose at Cycle 5 and Cycle 6 in Part 1 and at each follow up visit until 24 months after the last dose.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Predose at Cycles 5 and 6 and at each follow up visit until 24 months after the last dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
In Part 2, samples for the HACA assay were collected at each treatment cycle prior to the administration of rituximab and at each follow-up visit until 24 months after the last dose of rituximab.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Day 0 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and at each follow-up visit until 24 months after the last dose of rituximab.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Part 1: Total Cluster Differentiation19 Positive (CD19+) B-Cell Counts by Visit
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
CD 19 is a surface antigen (protein) present on B-lymphocytes.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Day 1 of Cycles 5 and 6 and Follow-up Days 28 and 56 and Follow-up Visits at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 21 and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Total B-Cell Depletion by Visit
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Total B-cell depletion (normal B-cell plus Malignant B-cell depletion) was defined for each individual participant when the sum of CD5-/CD19+ (normal B-cells) and CD5+/CD19+ (malignant B-cells) cell counts decreased below 80 cells/µL.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Day 1 pre-dose of Cycles 5 and 6 and Follow-up Days 28 and 56 and Follow-up Visits at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Part 2: Total CD19+ B-Cell Counts by Visit
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
CD 19 is a surface antigen (protein) present on B-lymphocytes.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Cycle 1 pre-dose, 60 minutes post-dose, Days 2 and 3 in Cycle 2, day 1 pre-dose in Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6, Follow-up Days 28 and 56, and Follow-up Visits at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 and Withdrawal Visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Total B-Cell Depletion by Visit
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Total B-cell depletion (normal B-cell plus Malignant B-cell depletion) was defined for each individual participant when the sum of CD5-/CD19+ (normal B-cells) and CD5+/CD19+ (malignant B-cells) cell counts decreased below 80 cells/µL.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 60 minutes post-dose, Days 2 and 3 in Cycle 2, day 1 in Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6, Follow-up Days 28 and 56, and Follow-up Visits at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 and Withdrawal Visit
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
* Patients with treatment-requiring chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1
* Life expectancy >6 months
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Transformation to aggressive B-cell malignancy
* History of other malignancy unless the patient was treated with curative intent and has been in remission for more than 5 years prior to enrolment
* HIV or Hepatitis B positive unless clearly due to vaccination
* Inadequate liver or renal function
* Any coexisting medical or psychological condition that would preclude participation in the required study procedures
Additional exclusion criterion for Part 1:
* Any previous treatment for CLL except for up to 4 cycles of rituximab IV in combination with FC chemotherapy as first-line treatment for CLL
Additional exclusion criterion for Part 2:
* Any previous treatment for CLL
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 1
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
18/04/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
17/11/2017
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
240
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
St George Hospital; Department of Haematology - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Royal Brisbane and Women'S Hospital; Haematology - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Ashford Cancer Center Research - Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Haematology - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
St Vincent'S Hospital; Haematology - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Frankston Hospital; Oncology/Haematology - Frankston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4029 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
5037 - Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
5011 - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3199 - Frankston
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
RS
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
SP
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Santiago
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Zagreb
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Praha 2
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Caen
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Reims
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Vandoeuvre Les Nancy
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Frankfurt an der Oder
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Greifswald
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Hannover
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Kassel
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Landshut
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Lübeck
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Marburg
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Muenchen
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Neunkirchen/Saar
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Recklinghausen
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Piemonte
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Veneto
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Chihuahua
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Culiacan
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Monterrey
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Newtown
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Penza
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Perm
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Saint-Petersburg
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Toledo
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Ankara
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Izmir
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This randomized, parallel-group, multi-center study will compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous administration of MabThera (rituximab) versus intravenous MabThera in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The study consists of 2 parts. In part 1, patients who have previously received 4 cycles of intravenous MabThera will receive in Cycle 5 intravenous MabThera and in Cycle 6 subcutaneous MabThera. In part 2, patients will be randomized to receive either 6 cycles of intravenous MabThera, or 1 cycle of intravenous MabThera and 5 cycles of subcutaneous MabThera. Additionally, all patients will receive chemotherapy (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) on Days 1-3 or Days 1-5 of every cycle. The anticipated time on study drug is 24 weeks.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01292603
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Assouline S, Buccheri V, Delmer A, Gaidano G, Trneny M, Berthillon N, Brewster M, Catalani O, Li S, McIntyre C, Sayyed P, Badoux X. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous versus intravenous rituximab plus chemotherapy as treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (SAWYER): a phase 1b, open-label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016 Mar;3(3):e128-38. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)00004-1. Assouline S, Buccheri V, Delmer A, Gaidano G, McIntyre C, Brewster M, Catalani O, Hourcade-Potelleret F, Sayyed P, Badoux X. Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous rituximab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;80(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12662. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Mao CP, Brovarney MR, Dabbagh K, Birnbock HF, Richter WF, Del Nagro CJ. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of rituximab: pharmacokinetics, CD20 target coverage and B-cell depletion in cynomolgus monkeys. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080533. eCollection 2013. Shpilberg O, Jackisch C. Subcutaneous administration of rituximab (MabThera) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) using hyaluronidase. Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 17;109(6):1556-61. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.371. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01292603
Download to PDF