Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01297322
Registration number
NCT01297322
Ethics application status
Date submitted
10/02/2011
Date registered
16/02/2011
Date last updated
22/01/2020
Titles & IDs
Public title
RESPECT Trial - (Rapid Extravascular Sealing Via PercutanEous Collagen ImplanT)
Query!
Scientific title
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Cardiva VASCADE VCS vs. Manual Compression for the Management of the Femoral Arteriotomy After Percutaneous Endovascular Procedures
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
PTL 0243
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
RESPECT
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Surgical Wound
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Other interventions - Manual compression
Treatment: Devices - Cardiva VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System
Active comparator: Manual compression - Using manual compression to reach hemostasis
Experimental: VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System - The Cardiva VASCADETM Vascular Closure System (VCS) is indicated for the percutaneous closure of common femoral artery access sites while reducing times to hemostasis and ambulation in patients who have undergone diagnostic or interventional endovascular catheterization procedures utilizing 6 Fr or 7 Fr procedural sheaths.
Other interventions: Manual compression
Standard of Care
Treatment: Devices: Cardiva VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System
Investigational Hemostatic Vascular Closure System
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Time to Hemostasis (TTH)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Primary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and first observed and confirmed arterial hemostasis.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Up to 1 hour
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Rate of Combined Access Site-related Major Complications
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Primary safety endpoint
* Access site-related bleeding requiring transfusion;
* Vascular injury requiring repair (via surgery, ultrasound guided compression, transcatheter embolization or stent graft);
* New ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia causing a threat to the viability of the limb and requiring surgical or additional percutaneous intervention. This compromised blood flow is documented by subject symptoms, physical exam and/or a decreased or absent blood flow on lower extremity angiogram.;
* Access site-related infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or extended hospitalization;
* New onset access site-related neuropathy in the ipsilateral lower extremity requiring surgical repair;
* Permanent access site-related nerve injury. (\> 30 days)
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
30 days +/- 7 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Time to Ambulation (TTA)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject stands and walks 20 feet without evidence of arterial re-bleeding
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Up to 1 day
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to Discharge Eligibility (TTDE)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject is medically able to be discharged based solely on the assessment of the access site, as determined by the medical team
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Up to 2 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Time to Hospital Discharge (TTHD)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject is actually discharged from the hospital
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Up to 2 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Device Success
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - ability to deploy the delivery system, deliver the collagen, and achieve hemostasis with VASCADE alone or with adjunctive compression
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Up to 1 day
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Procedure Success
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - attainment of final hemostasis using any method and freedom from major vascular complications through 30 days
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
30 days +/- 7 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Rate of Combined Minor Access Site Complications
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Secondary safety endpoint
* Access site-related bleeding requiring greater than 30 minutes to achieve hemostasis;
* Access site-related hematoma \> 6 cm;
* Late access site-related bleeding (following hospital discharge);
* Ipsilateral lower extremity arterial emboli;
* Ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis;
* Access site-related vessel laceration;
* Access site wound dehiscence;
* Localized access site infection treated with intramuscular or oral antibiotics;
* Arteriovenous fistula not requiring treatment;
* Pseudoaneurysm requiring thrombin injection or fibrin adhesive injection;
* Pseudoaneurysm not requiring treatment;
* New onset access site-related neuropathy in the ipsilateral lower extremity not requiring surgical repair;
* Ipsilateral pedal pulse diminished by two grades or transiently lost.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
30 days +/- 7 days
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Pre-Operative
* Patients undergoing an elective, non-emergent diagnostic or interventional endovascular procedure via the common femoral artery using a 6 or 7 Fr introducer sheath
Pre-Operative
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Advanced refusal of blood transfusion, if necessary;
2. Active systemic or a cutaneous infection or inflammation;
3. Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder and/or chronic use of systemic steroids;
4. Known, significant history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, von Willebrand's disease or current platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3, baseline INR =1.8, or fibrinogen level less than 150 mg/dl (if received a fibrinolytic agent within prior 24 hours);
5. Severe co-existing morbidities having a life expectancy of less than 30 days;
6. Currently involved in any other investigational clinical trial;
7. Ipsilateral femoral arteriotomy within the previous 30 days;
8. Planned endovascular procedure within the next 30 days;
9. Previous ipsilateral femoral artery closure using a permanent implant-based closure device;
10. Previous vascular grafts or surgery at the target vessel access site;
11. History of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, revascularization or deep vein thrombosis in the ipsilateral limb;
12. Unilateral or bilateral lower extremity amputation(s);
13. Significant anemia with a hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL or a hematocrit less than 30%;
14. Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine of > 2.5 mg/dl);
15. Females who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant within 3 months of the procedure, or lactating;
16. Extreme morbid obesity (BMI greater than 45 kg/m2) or underweight (BMI less than 20 kg/m2);
17. Unable to routinely walk at least 20 feet without assistance (see protocol);
18. Known allergy/adverse reaction to bovine derivatives, sodium hyaluronate or hyaluronan preparations;
19. Procedures that extend hospitalization (e.g., staged endovascular procedure, CABG);
20. Administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 8 hours of the procedure.
Intra-op Exclusion Criteria
1. An introducer sheath with an overall length greater than 11 cm, or not 6 Fr or 7 Fr diameter;
2. Femoral artery diameter less than 6 mm at access site;
3. Difficult insertion of procedural sheath or needle stick problems at the onset of the procedure (e.g., multiple stick attempts, "back wall stick", etc.);
4. Angiographic evidence of more than minimal calcium, atherosclerotic disease, or stent within 1 cm of the puncture site;
5. Overlapping Common Femoral Vein and Femoral Artery at access site;
6. Placement of ipsilateral venous sheath during procedure;
7. Arterial access site located not at common femoral artery (e.g., on or below the bifurcation, above the lower border of the inferior epigastric artery, or above the pelvic brim);
8. More than one access site required;
9. Loss of distal pulses in the ipsilateral extremity during the procedure;
10. Subjects receiving unfractionated heparin with an ACT greater than 300 seconds in the absence of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or greater than 250 seconds in the presence of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (may wait to remove introducer sheath until ACT level reaches the target value);
11. Intra-procedural bleeding around sheath, or suspected intraluminal thrombus, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or AV fistula;
12. Systemic hypertension (BP greater than 180/110 mmHg) or hypotension (BP less than 90/60 mmHg) prior to randomization;
13. Length of the tissue tract, the distance between the anterior arterial wall and skin, is estimated to be less than 2.5 cm;
14. If the physician deems that a different method should be used to achieve hemostasis of the arterial site or that the subject should not attempt ambulation according to the protocol requirements.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/07/2012
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
420
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3065 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Delaware
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Cardiva Medical, Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The objective of this trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Cardiva VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System (VCS) in sealing femoral arterial access sites. Hypothesis: The Cardiva VASCADE™ VCS provides times to hemostasis (TTH) and time to ambulation (TTA) results that are less than manual compression by a clinically meaningful and statistically significant margin. The rate of major access site-related complications with the Cardiva VASCADE™ VCS is non-inferior to the major complication rates of manual compression for sealing femoral arterial access sites.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01297322
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Lehmann KG, Heath-Lange SJ, Ferris ST. Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures. Am Heart J. 1999 Dec;138(6 Pt 1):1118-25. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70078-5. Simon A, Bumgarner B, Clark K, Israel S. Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. Am J Crit Care. 1998 Jul;7(4):308-13. Kussmaul WG 3rd, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, Aker UT, Heuser RR, King SB, Kent KM, Leon MB, Kolansky DM, Sandza JG Jr. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1685-92. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00101-9. Castaneda F, Swischuk JL, Smouse HB, Brady T. Gelatin sponge closure device versus manual compression after peripheral arterial catheterization procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Dec;14(12):1517-23. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000099530.29957.dd. Hoffer EK, Bloch RD. Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Jul;14(7):865-85. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000071086.76348.8e. Gerckens U, Cattelaens N, Lampe EG, Grube E. Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1658-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00174-5. Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Canos DA, Gevorkian N, Pinnow EE, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Weissman NJ, Lindsay J, Fuchs S. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;92(8):930-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00972-x. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):873-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:83.0.co;2-i. Erratum In: Stat Med 1999 May 30;18(10):1293.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
James B. Hermiller, Jr., MD, FACC
Query!
Address
0
0
The St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana, St. Vincent Hospital
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/22/NCT01297322/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/22/NCT01297322/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01297322
Download to PDF