Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609001001280
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
17/11/2009
Date registered
19/11/2009
Date last updated
10/08/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Acupuncture for Chronic Knee Pain Trial
Query!
Scientific title
The effect of acupuncture on pain and physical function in patients with chronic knee pain: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280999
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic knee pain
237141
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
237466
237466
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Alternative and Complementary Medicine
252411
252411
0
0
Query!
Other alternative and complementary medicine
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
There are two intervention groups, laser acupuncture and needle acupuncture. Needle acupuncture involves the use of acupuncture needles and laser acupuncture involves the aiming of laser light with a small pen-like device which is applied to the skin. The acupuncture (for both needle and laser groups) is delivered by General Practitioners who are Fellows of the College of Medical Acupuncture. There will be 8-12 treatment sessions over 12 weeks of 20 minutes per treatment. the number of treatment sessions will be determined by the treating General Practitioner (GP).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
236858
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
There are two comparator groups. Sham laser acupuncture and a Zelen control group (no intervention). Half of the 280 people in the study will be invited to take part in the laser acupuncture arm of the study. People in this arm of the project will have a 50% chance of receiving real laser acupuncture and a 50% chance of receiving sham laser acupuncture, which appears like real laser acupuncture, but it does not emit a laser beam. Both real and sham treatment will be provided by the same laser acupuncture machines. Each participant will be provided with a 4-digit numeric code that can be input into the laser machines. This code will be linked to either real laser or sham laser treatment. Neither the GP nor the patient will know which form of treatment is being provided and they will not be able to tell. Hence participants in the real laser and sham laser groups will have the same number of treatment visits over 12 weeks for the same period of time.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
238271
0
The primary outcome will be pain which is obtained via numeric rating scale questionnaires
Query!
Assessment method [1]
238271
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
238271
0
These will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
253288
0
Function, which will be also measured in the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
253288
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
253288
0
These will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
244638
0
The Arthritis Self Efficacy questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
244638
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
244638
0
This will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
262304
0
The Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised
Query!
Assessment method [2]
262304
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
262304
0
This will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
262305
0
Quality of Life, measured by The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQOL) and the Revised Health Hardiness questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
262305
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
262305
0
These will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
262306
0
Physical activity levels as measured by the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
262306
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
262306
0
This will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
262307
0
Psychosocial health as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
262307
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
262307
0
These will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
262308
0
Health economics, as measured by a recall questionnaire of all use of health professionals, medical tests, medications and absence from work in the previous 4 weeks.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
262308
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
262308
0
These will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
298717
0
Global change scale. Patients are asked to rate change in pain, physical function and overall from either much worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly better or much better.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
298717
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
298717
0
These will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
298718
0
Numeric rating scale of pain on walking and standing
Query!
Assessment method [8]
298718
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
298718
0
These will be administered at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
298719
0
Pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index
Query!
Assessment method [9]
298719
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
298719
0
Baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria will be community-based patients over the age of 50 years with pain, stiffness or both in one or both knees and able to give written, informed consent.
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria will be serious knee joint pathology (e.g. inflammatory arthritis, acute trauma, history of intra-articular fracture or malignancy), compensable knee injury, previous knee joint replacement, being on the waiting list for knee surgery, use of acupuncture within the past 12 months, needle phobia, bleeding diatheses or use of oral anticoagulant medication, knee pain arising from other structures (e.g. hip or spine), neurological disease affecting the lower limbs, having a separate injury that may influence the perception of pain, have been referred to a pain clinic or have evidence of neuropathic pain syndrome.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
A standard single consent Zelen methodology will be used whereby participants are initially enrolled into a longitudinal study. Following enrolment into the study, participants will be covertly randomised into one of four groups: (1) a no treatment control group, (2) laser acupuncture, (3) sham laser acupuncture and (4) needle acupuncture.
The allocation will be concealed and will be done using a computer program controlled by an administrator of the randomization sequencing, not involved in screening, recruitment or data management.
The participants in the no treatment control group are not informed about the other treatment groups.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Block randomisation which will be done with the use of a computer program.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/12/2009
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
280
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
237543
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
237543
0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Query!
Address [1]
237543
0
Level 1
16 Marcus Clarke Street
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
237543
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Melbourne, School of Physiotherapy
Query!
Address
200 Berkeley St
Carlton VIC 3053
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251387
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
251387
0
Query!
Address [1]
251387
0
Query!
Country [1]
251387
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
243681
0
University of Melbourne Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
243681
0
University of Melbourne, Vic, 3010
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
243681
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
243681
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
243681
0
01/08/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
243681
0
0931840.1
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study firstly aims to compare the effectiveness of laser acupuncture to sham laser acupuncture in people suffering from chronic knee pain. Secondly, the study aims to compare laser acupuncture to needle acupuncture in people suffering from chronic knee pain. And thirdly, the study aims to compare laser acupuncture, sham laser acupuncture and needle acupuncture to no treatment for chronic knee pain. The study hypothesis is that laser acupuncture will be more effective than sham laser acupuncture or no treatment and will be equal or more effective than needle acupuncture in treating people suffering from chronic knee pain.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
29835
0
Query!
Address
29835
0
Query!
Country
29835
0
Query!
Phone
29835
0
Query!
Fax
29835
0
Query!
Email
29835
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13082
0
Ben Metcalf
Query!
Address
13082
0
School of Physiotherapy
The University of Melbourne VIC 3010
Query!
Country
13082
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
13082
0
+61 3 8344 8127
Query!
Fax
13082
0
Query!
Email
13082
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4010
0
Ben Metcalf
Query!
Address
4010
0
School of Physiotherapy
The University of Melbourne VIC 3010
Query!
Country
4010
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
4010
0
+61 3 8344 8127
Query!
Fax
4010
0
Query!
Email
4010
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF