Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000695202
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/07/2009
Date registered
12/08/2009
Date last updated
16/06/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
SCIPA (Spinal Cord Injury and Physical Activity) Hands-On: Early Intensive Hand Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury
Query!
Scientific title
Early Intensive Hand Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury: Effect of a novel muscle-stimulator device versus standard treatment on hand function in participants with spinal cord injury.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
289478
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SCIPA Hands-On
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Spinal Cord Injury
237332
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents
239650
239650
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
239651
239651
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Neurological
239652
239652
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The device is a muscle-stimulator garment that incorporates a wireless-triggered stimulator cuff which emitts electrical impulses known as Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). The garment is worn on the forearm and triggered when the user clicks his/her teeth. The tooth clicks (vibrations) are detected by an earpiece, similar to a hearing aid, that sends a radio signal to the stimulator cuff. This in turn stimulates the hand to open or close, allowing the patients to grasp and release objects. The garmet will be used five times a week for up to one hour each session, over the 8 week intervention period. Patients will continue to receive standard care while participating in the study. The study intervention will be in addition to standard care.
The stimulator system has been approved by the Canadian Standards Association. The device is not yet available in Australia, but will be obtained from the inventor, Professor Arthur Prochazka, University of Alberta, Canada when funding for the study becomes available.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
236994
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
236995
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The comparator group for this study will be standard care already provided for hand function to patients with a spinal cord injury. Standard care will provided as per the individual patients standard treatment plan for their injury.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
238430
0
The primary endpoint is the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score at Week 8 (Post-
Intervention Assessment)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
238430
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
238430
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
244927
0
ARAT score at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
244927
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
244927
0
6months and 12months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
244928
0
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) at Week 8 (Post Protocol Intervention Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
244928
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
244928
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
244929
0
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) - Self Care scores at Week 8 (Post-Intervention
Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
244929
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
244929
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
244930
0
Quality of life outcomes, Assessment of Quality of Life-8 (AQoL-8) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3(HUI3 at Week 8 (Post-Intervention Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
244930
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
244930
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
244931
0
Upper limb American Spinal Inury Association (ASIA) sensory scores at Week 8 (Post-Intervention
Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months
Query!
Assessment method [5]
244931
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
244931
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
257184
0
AuSpinal assessment of hnd function at Week 8 (Post Protocol Intervention Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
257184
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
257184
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
257185
0
Texture discrimination capabilities of the fingertips measured by AsTex Sensory Test at Week 8 (Post Protocol Intervention Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
257185
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
257185
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
257186
0
The Capabilities of Upper Extremity (CUE), at Week 8 (Post Protocol Intervention Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
257186
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
257186
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
257187
0
Summed Upper Limb Strength
component of Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), at Week 8 (PostProtocolIntervention Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
257187
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
257187
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
257188
0
Participant Perception of Treatment Effectiveness (PPTE) at Week 8 (Post Protocol Intervention Assessment), and at 6 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
257188
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
257188
0
Following 8 weeks of treatment, 6 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* have sustained a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)within the preceding 6 months from time of consent
* are currently receiving inpatient rehabilitation through one of the study sites
* will remain in hospital for 12 weeks after initial screening
* are 16 years of age or older and able to provide informed consent
* have a motor complete or incomplete spinal cord injury at the neurological level of C2 to T1 (as per the International Standardised Neurological Assessment for SCI)
* can actively flex their target shoulder to 60 degrees
* have reduced ability to grasp using the target hand
* are able to tolerate sufficient Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) to enable one hand to grasp and release
* have the potential to benefit from FES and ReJoyce according to the judgment of the treating therapist
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* have any other type of neurological injury affecting the target hand (e.g. brachial plexus or peripheral nerve injuries)
* have had recent trauma or surgery to the target hand or upper limb within the last 12 months
* have had amputation of any digits on the target hand
* are not able to sit out of bed each day for at least 2 hours over three consecutive days
* have extensive fixed contractures in the upper limb of the target hand preventing use of the ReJoyce
* have severe spasticity in the target hand or upper limb preventing use of the ReJoyce
* are unable to attend the 6-month and 1-year follow-up assessments at their treating spinal unit
* are likely to undergo hand surgery in the target hand in the next year
* are likely to experience autonomic dysreflexia and/or hypotension in response to electrical stimulation
* have any contraindications to FES such as cardiac pacemaker, epilepsy, forearm fracture or pregnancy
* have intracranial metal implants
* have impaired vision and/or are unable to view a computer screen
* have any other serious medical condition including malignancies, psychiatric, behavioural or drug-dependency problems, which are likely to influence the participant’s ability to cooperate or in the opinion of the study investigator would prevent the participant from adhering to the Protocol.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Partiticpants will participate in a screening visit and a baseline visit prior to randomisation.
Eligible participants will be randomised to one of two groups, namely:
1. Group A - Experimental group: FES-assisted hand exercise plus standard care,
2. Group B - Control group: standard care alone.
Randomisation will be stratified by site and baseline Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score (<=21 versus >21) and co-ordinated by a central randomisation unit. Upon completion of all screening and baseline assessments and suitability checks, a participant eligibility checklist will be completed by the Site Coordinator and signed by the Principal Investigator. This checklist will be sent to the central randomisation unit who will notify the Site Coordinator of treatment assignment in writing. This will not be disclosed to the Blinded Assessors.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2009
Query!
Actual
1/02/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2013
Query!
Actual
16/12/2013
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
78
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
70
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
1979
0
1680
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
1980
0
5000
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
1981
0
3101
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
1982
0
2036
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
1983
0
6001
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
1984
0
4102
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
1914
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
1914
0
Auckland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
237381
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
237381
0
Victorian Neurotrama Initiative
Query!
Address [1]
237381
0
Level 6, 60 Brougham Street
Geelong, VIC 3220
Query!
Country [1]
237381
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
293837
0
Government body
Query!
Name [2]
293837
0
Lifetime Care and Support Authority
Query!
Address [2]
293837
0
Level 24, 580 George St
Sydney NSW 2000
Query!
Country [2]
293837
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Melbourne
Query!
Address
The University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC, 3101
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
236881
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
236881
0
Query!
Address [1]
236881
0
Query!
Country [1]
236881
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
239512
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
239512
0
Level 3, Hanson Institute Royal Adelaide Hospital North Terrace Adelaide, SA, 5000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
239512
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
239512
0
27/08/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
239512
0
18/11/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
239512
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
239513
0
Multi-region Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
239513
0
P.O. Box 5013 Wellington, 5016
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
239513
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
239513
0
31/07/2009
Query!
Approval date [2]
239513
0
23/10/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
239513
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
239582
0
Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
239582
0
Austin Health 145 Studley Road Heidelberg, VIC, 3084
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
239582
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
239582
0
03/08/2009
Query!
Approval date [3]
239582
0
12/10/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
239582
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [4]
258470
0
Royal Perth Hospital Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [4]
258470
0
Room 4112, Level 4, Kirkman House, Perth, 6000, WA
Query!
Ethics committee country [4]
258470
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [4]
258470
0
26/08/2009
Query!
Approval date [4]
258470
0
04/12/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [4]
258470
0
2009/083
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study is a multi-centre, assessor-blind, randomised controlled phase III trial in patients with tetraplegia (a spinal cord injury). A total of 78 participants will be randomised into two groups; 1. the experimental group and 2. the control group. The control group will receive standard rehabilitation care, while the experimental group will receive standard rehabilitation care plus the study treatment which involves one hour of extra hand training using a specialised glove and computer workstation, 5 times a week. The primary objective is to determine if the study treatment is more effective than standard rehabilitation care alone in participants with tetraplegia. The secondary objectives involve collecting exploratory data to support primary objective, including an economic analysis. Total study duration is 3 years, including an 18 month recruitment period, an 8-week treatment period followed by 6 month and 12 month follow up assessments. The study treatment will be assessed by a blinded assessor (the assessor will not know which group the participants are in) using standard physiotherapy/occupational therapy assessments which involve grasping and releasing different objects and performing everyday tasks as well as quality of life questionnaires. Functional electrical stimulation combined with task-specific training provided in addition to standard care is more effective in improving hand function than standard care alone.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Harvey LA1, Dunlop SA, Churilov L, Hsueh YS, Galea MP. Early intensive hand rehabilitation after spinal cord injury ("Hands On"): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. (2011) Jan 17;12:14. LA Harvey, SA Dunlop, L Churilov, MP Galea, Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury (‘Hands On’): a randomised trial. JPhysiotherapy, (2016) Vol 62, Issue 2, 88–95
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
29947
0
A/Prof Lisa Harvey
Query!
Address
29947
0
Rehabilitation Studies Unit
Sydney Medical School/Northern
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY
PO Box 6
RYDE, NSW, 2112
Query!
Country
29947
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
29947
0
+61 2 9809 9099
Query!
Fax
29947
0
Query!
Email
29947
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13194
0
Melanie Hurley
Query!
Address
13194
0
Neuroscience Trials Australia (SCIPA / University of Melbourne)
(a business unit within the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health) Melbourne Brain Centre - Austin Campus
245 Burgundy Street
Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
13194
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
13194
0
+61 3 9035 7235
Query!
Fax
13194
0
+61 3 9496 2881
Query!
Email
13194
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4122
0
Prof Mary Galea
Query!
Address
4122
0
Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital)
The University of Melbourne
Royal Park Campus
34-54 Poplar Road
Parkville, Victoria, 3052
Query!
Country
4122
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
4122
0
+61 3 8387 2017
Query!
Fax
4122
0
No fax
Query!
Email
4122
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Dimensions AI
Early intensive hand rehabilitation after spinal cord injury ("Hands On"): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
2011
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-14
Embase
Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury ('Hands On'): a randomised trial.
2016
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.013
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF