Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01302392
Registration number
NCT01302392
Ethics application status
Date submitted
10/02/2011
Date registered
24/02/2011
Date last updated
2/05/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Carfilzomib vs Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib vs Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
PX-171-011
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
FOCUS
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Multiple Myeloma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other cancer types
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Carfilzomib
Treatment: Drugs - Best Supportive Care
Active comparator: Best Supportive Care -
Experimental: Carfilzomib -
Treatment: Drugs: Carfilzomib
20mg/m² IV on Days 1 and 2 of Cycle 1, escalating to 27 mg/m² IV on Days 8,9,15,and 16 of Cycle 1 and continuing on Days 1,2,8,9,15,and 16 of Cycles 2 through Cycle 9. Cycles 10 and beyond will receive 27 mg/m² IV on Days 1,2,15, and 16 (alternatively, the investigator could choose to continue the dosing frequency on the original dosing days \[Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16\] for individual subjects).
Treatment: Drugs: Best Supportive Care
Corticosteroid (either prednisolone 30 mg orally (PO) every other day, dexamethasone 6 mg PO every other day, or other equivalent corticosteroid).
Optional cyclophosphamide 50 mg PO once daily may be given at the Investigator's discretion (maximum of 1400 mg per 28-day cycle).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Time elapsed between the randomization date and the date of death. Participants who were still alive were censored at date when the subject is last known alive or the data cutoff date, whichever occurs earlier.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 45 months. Median follow up times were 27.8 months and 29.8 months for Carfilzomib and Best Supportive Care groups, respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or all-cause death. PD was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group-Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC). 1 or more conditions were required to meet PD: 2 consecutive rising serum or urine M-protein from central lab; documented new bone lesion(s) or soft tissue plasmacytoma(s) or increased size of existing bone lesion(s) or plasmacytoma(s); or confirmed hypercalcemia due solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder (local lab greater than 11.5 mg/dL on 2 separate occasions). Censoring conditions (censoring dates) were: no post-baseline disease assessment (DA) (randomization date); started non-protocol systemic anticancer treatment before PD or death (last DA date before such treatment); died or had PD after more than 1 missed DA (last DA date without PD before the first missed visit); or were alive and without documentation of PD, including lost to follow-up without PD (last DA date).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 31 months. Median follow up times were 26.6 months and 23.1 months for Carfilzomib and Best Supportive Care groups, respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Overall Response
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Number of participants who achieved confirmed stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) as their best response. Response was determined using the International Myeloma Working Group - Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From randomization through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 31 months. Median follow up times were 26.6 months and 23.1 months for Carfilzomib and Best Supportive Care groups, respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Duration of Response
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Duration of response (DOR) was calculated for subjects who achieved a best response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR). Duration of response was defined as the time in months from the initial start of response (PR or better) to the earlier of documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who had not progressed or died were censored according to the censoring rules defined previously for progression-free survival.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From the time achieving response through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 29 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Response
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Number of participants who achieved confirmed stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), or minimal response (MR) as their best response. Response was determined using the International Myeloma Working Group - Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC). (MR was determined using European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria)
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From randomization through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 31 months. Median follow up times were 26.6 months and 23.1 months for Carfilzomib and Best Supportive Care groups, respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Duration of Clinical Benefit
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Duration of Clinical Benefit was calculated for subjects who achieved a best response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR) or minimal response (MR). Duration of Clinical Benefit was defined as the time in months from the initial start of response (MR or better) to the earlier of documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who had not progressed or died were censored according to the censoring rules defined previously for progression-free survival.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From time of achieving clinical benefit through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 30 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Disease Control
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Number of participants who achieved confirmed stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), or stable disease (SD) lasting = 8 weeks as their best response. Response was determined using the International Myeloma Working Group - Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC). (MR was determined using European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria)
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From randomization through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 31 months. Median follow up times were 26.6 months and 23.1 months for Carfilzomib and Best Supportive Care groups, respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Duration of Disease Control
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Duration of Disease Control was calculated for subjects who achieved disease control. Duration of Disease Control was defined as the time in months from randomization to the earlier of documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who had not progressed or died were censored according to the censoring rules defined previously for progression-free survival.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From time of achieving disease control through the final analysis data cutoff with longest follow-up time of approximately 31 months.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Multiple myeloma
2. Measurable disease based on central laboratory values, as defined by one or both of the following criteria (assessed within 21 days prior to randomization):
* Serum M-protein
* Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP): = 0.5 g/dL
* For immunoglobulin A (IgA) patients whose disease can only be reliably measured by serum quantitative immunoglobulin (qIgA): > 750 mg/dL (0.75 g/dL)
* Urine Bence Jones protein: = 200 mg/24 h
3. Responsive (defined as a 25% or greater decrease in M-protein or total protein) to at least one line of prior therapy
4. Relapsed multiple myeloma, defined as disease progression while on or after at least 1 prior treatment regimen
5. Refractory multiple myeloma, defined as meeting one or more of the following:
* Nonresponsive to most recent therapy (eg, stable disease only, or progressive disease while on treatment)
* Disease progression within 60 days of discontinuation from most recent therapy
6. Received 3 or more prior therapeutic regimens for multiple myeloma
7. Adequate prior treatment with bortezomib (if less than 4 complete cycles, the reason for discontinuation must be reviewed by the Medical Monitor and the reason documented)
8. Prior treatment with an immunomodulatory agent (lenalidomide, if available, and/or thalidomide)
9. Prior treatment with an alkylating agent (standard or high-dose)
10. Prior treatment with a corticosteroid
11. Criterion no longer applicable (with Amendment 2, Criterion 11, the requirement of "prior treatment with an anthracycline unless not clinically indicated" is removed.)
12. Age = 18 years
13. Life expectancy of at least 1 month
14. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
15. Adequate hepatic function, with serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 4 times the upper limit of normal and serum bilirubin < 2.5 mg/dL (42.5 µmol/L). Patients with total bilirubin = 2.5 mg/dL may enrol if their serum direct bilirubin is < 2.5 mg/dL.
16. Total white blood cell (WBC) count = 1.5 × 10^9/L and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1.0 × 10^9/L (use of colony-stimulating factors to achieve these counts is allowed)
17. Hemoglobin = 7.5 g/dL (75 g/L)
-Use of erythropoietic stimulating factors is allowed:
* For all patients who receive a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion within 28 days of obtaining the Screening hemoglobin value. The following information must be provided for the Medical Monitor's review for assessment for eligibility:
* Pre-transfusion hemoglobin (Hb)
* Number of RBC units administered
* Use of erythropoietic stimulating factors
18. Platelet count = 30 × 10^9/L
-There is no restriction on platelet transfusions or thrombopoietic growth factor before or during the screening period
* For all patients who receive a platelet transfusion within 7 days of obtaining the Screening platelet value, the following information must be provided for the Medical Monitor's review for assessment of eligibility
* Pre-transfusion platelet count
* Number of platelet units administered
* Use of thrombopoietic growth factors
19. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) = 15 mL/minute (either measured or calculated using a standard formula such as Cockcroft and Gault) and dialysis-independent
20. Written informed consent in accordance with regulatory guidelines
21. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days of the first dose of study treatment and agree to use an effective method of contraception during the study and for 3 months following the last dose of study treatment. Post-menopausal females (> 45 years old and without menses for > 1 year) and surgically sterilized females are exempt from these requirements. Male patients must use an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 3 months following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Waldenström's macroglobulinemia or IgM myeloma
2. Refractory to all prior therapies
3. Disease measurable only by serum free light chain assay (SFLC)
4. POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes)
5. Plasma cell leukemia (> 2.0 × 10^9/L circulating plasma cells by standard differential)
6. Prior carfilzomib treatment
7. Chemotherapy (approved or investigational) within 14 days prior to randomization
8. Immunotherapy or antibody therapy within 28 days prior to randomization
9. Corticosteroid therapy at a dose equivalent to dexamethasone > 4 mg/day within 14 days prior to randomization
10. Radiotherapy within 7 days prior to randomization
11. Major surgery within 21 days prior to randomization
12. Congestive heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV) or symptomatic cardiac ischemia, conduction system abnormalities uncontrolled by conventional intervention (conduction abnormalities not clinically warranting intervention are allowed)
13. Myocardial infarction in the previous 3 months
14. Acute active infection requiring systemic treatment (antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals) within 14 days prior to randomization
15. Known human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity
16. Active hepatitis A, B, or C infection
17. Other malignancy within the past 3 years with the exception of a) adequately treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell skin cancer, or thyroid cancer; b) carcinoma in situ of the cervix, vulva, or breast; c) prostate cancer of Gleason Score 6 or less with stable prostate-specific antigen levels; or d) cancer considered cured by surgical resection or unlikely to impact survival during the duration of the study, such as localized transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, carcinoma in situ of the breast, or benign tumors of the adrenal or pancreas
18. Significant neuropathy (Grades 3-4, or Grade 2 with pain) at the time of randomization
19. Any other clinically significant medical disease or condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with protocol adherence or a patient's ability to give informed consent
20. Pregnant or lactating females
21. Contraindication to any of the required concomitant drugs or supportive treatments, including hypersensitivity or known history of allergy to carfilzomib, Captisol® (a cyclodextrin derivative used to solubilize carfilzomib) all anticoagulation and antiplatelet options, antiviral drugs; or intolerance to hydration due to preexisting pulmonary or cardiac impairment
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
315
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Perth
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Linz
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Salzburg
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Arlon
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Brugge
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Roeselare
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Hradec Kralov
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Prague
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Nantes
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Nimes
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Giessen
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Koblenz
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Mainz
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Muenchen
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Ulm
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Rio Patras
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Gyor
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Gyula
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Kaposvar
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Pecs
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Szeged
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Kfar Saba
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Nahariva
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Petah-Tikva
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Sheba
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Ancona
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Novara
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Torino
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
North Shore City
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Pila
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Torum
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Warsaw
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Zamosc
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
St. Petersburg
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Beograd
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Nis
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Guipuzcoa
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Murcia
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Zaragoza
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Hampshire
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Oxford
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Amgen
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study comparing two treatment regimens for subjects with multiple myeloma who have received all available approved treatment options and may therefore be considered candidates for palliative care.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01302392
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Hajek R, Masszi T, Petrucci MT, Palumbo A, Rosinol L, Nagler A, Yong KL, Oriol A, Minarik J, Pour L, Dimopoulos MA, Maisnar V, Rossi D, Kasparu H, Van Droogenbroeck J, Yehuda DB, Hardan I, Jenner M, Calbecka M, David M, de la Rubia J, Drach J, Gasztonyi Z, Gornik S, Leleu X, Munder M, Offidani M, Zojer N, Rajangam K, Chang YL, San-Miguel JF, Ludwig H. A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS). Leukemia. 2017 Jan;31(1):107-114. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.176. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Hajek R, Bryce R, Ro S, Klencke B, Ludwig H. Design and rationale of FOCUS (PX-171-011): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of carfilzomib versus best supportive care regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 19;12:415. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-415.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Amgen
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01302392
Download to PDF