Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01308580
Registration number
NCT01308580
Ethics application status
Date submitted
3/03/2011
Date registered
4/03/2011
Date last updated
17/04/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² Compared to 25 mg/m² With Prednisone for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
Randomized, Open Label Multi-Center Study Comparing Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² and at 25 mg/m² Every 3 Weeks in Combination With Prednisone for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-Containing Regimen
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2010-022163-35
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
EFC11785
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
PROSELICA
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Prostate Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Prostate
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Cabazitaxel (XRP6258)
Treatment: Drugs - Prednisone (or Prednisolone)
Experimental: Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2 - Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 1 hour on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone (or Prednisolone) 10 mg orally daily until disease progression (DP), unacceptable toxicity, participant's refusal of further study treatment or for a maximum of 10 cycles.
Experimental: Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2 - Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over 1 hour on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone (or Prednisolone) 10 mg orally daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity, participant's refusal of further study treatment or for a maximum of 10 cycles.
Treatment: Drugs: Cabazitaxel (XRP6258)
Pharmaceutical form: Concentrate and solvent for solution for infusion
Route of administration: Intravenous
Treatment: Drugs: Prednisone (or Prednisolone)
Pharmaceutical form: Tablet
Route of administration: Oral
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
OS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the earlier of the last date the participant was known to be alive or the study cut-off date. The cut-off date for the final analysis of OS was the date when the 988th death had been observed. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From baseline up to death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS was evaluated from date of randomization to date of first documentation of any of the events: 1) Radiological tumor progression: as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of =5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target lesions, 2) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression: =25% increase over baseline/nadir value if baseline PSA =10 ng/mL; or 25% increase above the baseline level if baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL \& \<10 ng/mL; or post-baseline value of \>=2 ng/mL, if baseline PSA=0 ng/mL, 3) Pain progression: increase of =1 point in median Present Pain Intensity (PPI) from nadir or =25% increase in mean analgesic score (AS) from baseline score or requirement of local palliative radiotherapy, 4) Death. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From baseline up to tumor progression, PSA progression, pain progression, death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to Tumor Progression
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Time to Tumor progression was defined as the first occurrence of radiological tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1. Radiological tumor progression was defined at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of =5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target-lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From baseline up to tumor progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Overall objective tumor response was defined as either a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, as assessed by the investigator. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From baseline up to DP or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to PSA Progression
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Time to PSA progression was time interval between randomization \& first occurrence of PSA progression. PSA progression defined as: 1) PSA responders (\>50% decline from baseline PSA =10 ng/mL): increase of =25% (=2 ng/mL) over nadir value, confirmed by second PSA =3 weeks later; 2) PSA non-responders (did not achieve \>50% decline from baseline PSA =10 ng/mL): increase of =25% (=2 ng/mL) over baseline value, confirmed by second PSA =3 weeks later; 3) In participants not eligible for PSA response (baseline PSA \<10 ng/mL): (a) participants with baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL \& \<10 ng/mL: increase in PSA by 25% (=2 ng/mL) above baseline level, confirmed by second PSA value =3 weeks apart; (b) participants with baseline value=0 ng/mL: post-baseline PSA value =2 ng/mL. Note (for 1-3): Rise in PSA in first 12 weeks was progression only if met definition above and was associated with other sign of DP or if it continued beyond 12 weeks. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With PSA Response
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
PSA response was defined as =50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks later in participants with baseline PSA value =10 ng/mL.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Time to Pain Progression
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Pain Progression was defined as an increase of =1 point in the median PPI from its nadir confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or =25 % increase in the mean AS compared with the baseline score confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or requirement for local palliative radiotherapy. PPI was rated by participant in a diary using a scale of 0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible 5=excruciating. Analgesic use was recorded by the participant in a diary. AS was calculated from the analgesic use data based on a table of analgesic medications, with non-narcotic medications assigned a value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned a value of 4 points. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Pain Response
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Pain response was defined as either a =2-point decrease from baseline median PPI score without increase in AS, or a =50% decrease from baseline mean AS without increase in the PPI score, maintained for 2 consecutive evaluations at least 3 weeks apart. Increases in pain during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P TOI combines physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns sub-scales for a total possible score range of 0 to 104, where higher values represent better HRQoL.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoL
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P Total Score sums all 5 sub-scales to give a score in the range of 0 to 156, where higher values represent better HRQoL.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With FACT-P Total Score Response
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P Total Score sums all 5 sub-scales to give a score in the range of 0 to 156, where higher values represent better HRQoL. Responder of FACT-P was defined as at least one occurrence of 7-point improvement from baseline in FACT-P total score during treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of Score by 10% From Baseline on FACT-P Sub-Scales
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The time to definitive deterioration (10% decrease in score from baseline) was assessed for the individual sub-scales (Physical Well-Being; Social/Family Well-Being; Emotional Well-Being; Functional Well-Being; Prostate-Specific Concerns). Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG PS Score From Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The ECOG PS was used to evaluate participant's DP and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0= normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for \< 50 % of the time; 3= in bed for \> 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG PS score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to =2, or from 2 to =3. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From baseline until death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Time to Definitive Weight Loss by 5% and 10% From Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Time to definitive weight loss was defined as the time to first occurrence of =5% or =10% decrease in body weight from baseline. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From baseline until death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Time to First Definitive Consumption of Narcotic Medication
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Concomitant medications used were recorded for all participants, and time of first definitive consumption of narcotic medication (if it occurred) was determined. This measure summarizes the time from baseline to first definitive consumption of narcotic medication. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period. On-treatment period: The time from the first dose of treatment to 30 days after the last dose of treatment (either Cabazitaxel or Prednisone). A serious adverse event: Any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03 (Grade 3 \[severe\] and Grade 4 \[life-threatening\]) was used in this study to grade clinical AEs.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment (Maximum duration: 48 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Plasma Clearance (CL) for Cabazitaxel
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were obtained from a subset of the study participants (approximately 150 participants/group, by protocol) according to a sparse sampling strategy.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Day 1 of Cycle 1: 5 minutes before the end of infusion (EOI), 15 minutes, 1 to 4 hour, 6 to 24 hours, 48 to 168 hour after EOI
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Plasma Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) for Cabazitaxel
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Blood samples for PK analysis were obtained from a subset of the study participants (approximately 150 participants/group, by protocol) according to a sparse sampling strategy.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Day 1 of Cycle 1: 5 minutes before the EOI, 15 minutes, 1 to 4 hour, 6 to 24 hours, 48 to 168 hour after EOI
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria :
I 01. Diagnosis of histologically or cytologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma, that was resistant to hormone therapy and previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen.
I 02. Participant must had either measurable or non-measurable disease. I 03. Received prior castration by orchiectomy and/or Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LH-RH) agonist with or without antiandrogen, antiandrogen withdrawal, monotherapy with estramustine, or other hormonal agents.
I 04. Life expectancy > 6 months. I 05. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 - 2 (i.e, participant must be ambulatory, capable of all self-care, and up and about more than 50% of waking hours).
I 06. Age =18 years (or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was > 18 years).
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
E 01. Previous treatment with mitoxantrone or cabazitaxel. E 02. Prior isotope therapy or radiotherapy to =30% of bone marrow. In case of prior isotope therapy 12 weeks must had elapsed prior to first study drug administration.
E 03. Adverse events (excluding alopecia and those listed in the specific exclusion criteria) from any prior anticancer therapy of grade >1(National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria [NCI CTCAE] v4.03) at the time of randomization.
E 04. Prior surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or other anti-cancer therapy within 4 weeks prior to enrollment in the study.
E 05. Prior malignancy. Adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin or superficial (pTis, pTa, and pT1) bladder cancer were allowed, as well as any other cancer for which chemotherapy had been completed = 5 years ago and from which the participant had been disease-free for = 5 years.
E 06. Participation in another clinical trial and any concurrent treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization.
E 07. Known brain or leptomeningeal involvement. E 08. Other concurrent serious illness or medical conditions. E 09. Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, angina pectoris, and/or hypertension. History of congestive heart failure (NYHA III or IV) or myocardial infarction within last 6 months was also not allowed.
E 10. Any severe acute or chronic medical condition which could impair the ability of the participant to participate to the study or to comply with the study procedures or interfere with interpretation of study results.
E 11. Absence of signed and dated Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved participant informed consent form prior to enrollment into the study.
E 12. Participants with reproductive potential who did not agree to use accepted and effective method of contraception during the study treatment period. The definition of "effective method of contraception" was based on the Investigator's judgment. Participant's Partners of childbearing potential (unless surgically sterile, post menopausal or for another reason had no chance of becoming pregnant) not protected by highly effective contraceptive method of birth control as defined for contraception in the Informed Consent Form and /or in a local protocol addendum.
E 13. History of hypersensitivity to docetaxel, or polysorbate 80. E 14. Inadequate organ and bone marrow function. E 15. Contraindications to the use of corticosteroid treatment. E 16. Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy grade > 2 (NCI CTCAE v.4.03).
The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/08/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1200
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036014 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036013 - Bankstown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036010 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036012 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036008 - Coffs Harbour
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036001 - Concord
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036015 - Elizabeth Vale
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036009 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036007 - Garran
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036005 - Heidelberg West
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036002 - Malvern
Query!
Recruitment hospital [12]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036006 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [13]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036016 - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment hospital [14]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036003 - Wahroonga
Query!
Recruitment hospital [15]
0
0
Investigational Site Number 036004 - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2200 - Bankstown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3128 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
2450 - Coffs Harbour
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
2137 - Concord
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
5112 - Elizabeth Vale
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
2605 - Garran
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
0
0
3081 - Heidelberg West
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
0
0
3144 - Malvern
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
0
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
0
0
6008 - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [14]
0
0
2076 - Wahroonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [15]
0
0
3690 - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Rhode Island
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Rosario
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Salta
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Santa Fe
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Antwerpen
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Brussel
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Charleroi
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Godinne
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Haine-Saint-Paul
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Hasselt
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Libramont
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Liège
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Ottignies
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Roeselare
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Turnhout
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Fortaleza
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Ijui
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Mogi Das Cruzes
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Porto Alegre
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Rio De Janeiro
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Salvador
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Sao Jose Do Rio Preto
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Greenfield Park
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Oshawa
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Ottawa
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Owen Sound
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Santiago
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Viña Del Mar
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Avignon Cedex 9
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Hyeres
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
La Roche Sur Yon
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Nantes Cedex 2
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Nimes
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Reims Cedex
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Reims
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Saint Brieuc Cedex
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 03
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 09
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Aachen
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Düsseldorf
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Homburg
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Nürtingen
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Tübingen
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Wuppertal
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Miskolc
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Pécs
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Seongnam
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Arnhem
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Blaricum
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Hoofddorp
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Nijmegen
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Zwolle
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Peru
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Arequipa
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Peru
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Lima
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Lubin
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Olsztyn
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Rybnik
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Siedlce
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Torun
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Alba Iulia
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Baia Mare
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Bucuresti
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Cluj Napoca
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Focsani
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Hunedoara
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Onesti
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Ekaterinburg
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Obninsk
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
St.Petersburg
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Tula
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Cape Town
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Durban
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Johannesburg
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Pretoria
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Badalona
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Málaga
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Palma De Mallorca
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Sabadell
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Taiching
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Tainan
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Sfax
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Sousse
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Tunis
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Antalya
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Bornova
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Colchester
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
Guildford
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Newcastle Upon Tyne
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Sutton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Sanofi
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Primary Objective: - To demonstrate the non inferiority in term of overall survival (OS) of Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m² (Arm A) versus Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² (Arm B) in combination with prednisone in participants with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate safety in the 2 treatment arms and to assess if Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m² was better tolerated than Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m². * To compare efficacy of Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² and 25 mg/m² for: * Progression Free Survival (PFS) defined as the first occurrence of any of the following events: tumor progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, pain progression or death due to any cause; * PSA Progression; * Pain progression; * Tumor response in participants with measurable disease (RECIST 1.1); * PSA response; * Pain response in participants with stable pain at baseline. * To compare Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL). * To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of Cabazitaxel.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01308580
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Meisel A, de Wit R, Oudard S, Sartor O, Stenner-Liewen F, Shun Z, Foster M, Ozatilgan A, Eisenberger M, de Bono JS. Neutropenia, neutrophilia, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic markers in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;14:17588359221100022. doi: 10.1177/17588359221100022. eCollection 2022. Thiery-Vuillemin A, Fizazi K, Sartor O, Oudard S, Bury D, Thangavelu K, Ozatilgan A, Poole EM, Eisenberger M, de Bono J. An analysis of health-related quality of life in the phase III PROSELICA and FIRSTANA studies assessing cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ESMO Open. 2021 Apr;6(2):100089. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100089. Epub 2021 Mar 16. Mehra N, Dolling D, Sumanasuriya S, Christova R, Pope L, Carreira S, Seed G, Yuan W, Goodall J, Hall E, Flohr P, Boysen G, Bianchini D, Sartor O, Eisenberger MA, Fizazi K, Oudard S, Chadjaa M, Mace S, de Bono JS. Plasma Cell-free DNA Concentration and Outcomes from Taxane Therapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer from Two Phase III Trials (FIRSTANA and PROSELICA). Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 28. Eisenberger M, Hardy-Bessard AC, Kim CS, Geczi L, Ford D, Mourey L, Carles J, Parente P, Font A, Kacso G, Chadjaa M, Zhang W, Bernard J, de Bono J. Phase III Study Comparing a Reduced Dose of Cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2) and the Currently Approved Dose (25 mg/m2) in Postdocetaxel Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-PROSELICA. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3198-3206. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1076. Epub 2017 Aug 15. Winquist E, Rodrigues G. Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada. Can J Urol. 2012 Dec;19(6):6587-91. No abstract available.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Query!
Address
0
0
Sanofi
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01308580
Download to PDF