Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01332968
Registration number
NCT01332968
Ethics application status
Date submitted
8/04/2011
Date registered
11/04/2011
Date last updated
11/08/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759) Plus Chemotherapy in Comparison With Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Obinutuzumab or Rituximab Maintenance in Patients With Untreated Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GALLIUM)
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Evaluating the Benefit of GA101 (RO5072759) Plus Chemotherapy Compared With Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by GA101 or Rituximab Maintenance Therapy in Responders
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2010-024132-41
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
BO21223
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Obinutuzumab
Treatment: Drugs - Cyclophosphamide
Treatment: Drugs - Doxorubicin
Treatment: Drugs - Vincristine
Treatment: Drugs - Prednisone
Treatment: Drugs - Bendamustine
Treatment: Drugs - Rituximab
Active comparator: Rituximab+Chemotherapy - Participants will receive either 8 cycles of rituximab along with 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) (21-day cycle) or 8 cycles of rituximab along with 8 cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) (21-day cycles) or 6 cycles of rituximab along with 6 cycles of bendamustine (28-day cycle) during the induction period. The induction period will be followed by either a maintenance or observation period for responders or non-responders, respectively. Responders will receive rituximab monotherapy every 2 months for 2 years during the maintenance period. Non-responders will receive no protocol specified treatment during the 2-year observation period. Finally, participants will be followed during a 5-year follow-up period. The chemotherapy regimen (CHOP or CVP or bendamustine) for individual participant will be chosen by the site prior to initiation of the study.
Experimental: Obinutuzumab+Chemotherapy - Participants will receive either 8 cycles of obinutuzumab along with 6 cycles of CHOP (21-day cycle) or 8 cycles of obinutuzumab along with 8 cycles of CVP (21-day cycles) or 6 cycles of obinutuzumab along with 6 cycles of bendamustine (28-day cycle) during induction period. The induction period will be followed by either a maintenance or observation period for responders or non-responders, respectively. Responders will receive obinutuzumab monotherapy every 2 months for 2 years during the maintenance period. Non-responders will receive no protocol specified treatment during the 2-year observation period. Finally, participants will be followed during a 5-year follow-up period. The chemotherapy regimen (CHOP or CVP or bendamustine) for individual participant will be chosen by the site prior to initiation of the study.
Treatment: Drugs: Obinutuzumab
Obinutuzumab 1000 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion will be administered on Day 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1 and then on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle during induction period and obinutuzumab 1000 mg IV infusion every 2 months during maintenance period.
Treatment: Drugs: Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m\^2 IV will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle during induction period.
Treatment: Drugs: Doxorubicin
Doxorubicin 50 mg/m\^2 IV will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle during induction period.
Treatment: Drugs: Vincristine
Vincristine 1.4 mg/m\^2 (maximum 2 mg) IV will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle during induction period.
Treatment: Drugs: Prednisone
Prednisone 100 mg (or equivalent prednisolone or methylprednisolone) will be administered orally on Days 1-5 of each cycle during induction period.
Treatment: Drugs: Bendamustine
Bendamustine 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion will be administered on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle during induction period.
Treatment: Drugs: Rituximab
Rituximab 375 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle during induction period and rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 every 2 months during maintenance period.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival in the Follicular Lymphoma Population, Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Progression-free survival in participants with follicular lymphoma was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years and 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival in the Follicular Lymphoma Population, Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Progression-free survival in participants with follicular lymphoma was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline up to final analysis (up to 10 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival in the Overall Study Population, Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Progression-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Progression-free survival in the participants with follicular lymphoma was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of IRC assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. In the first 170 patients with follicular lymphoma, an FDG-PET was mandatory where a PET scanner was available.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival (Overall Study Population), Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Progression-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from randomization until the first documented day of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of IRC assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Progression was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Overall Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Overall response in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as percentage of participants with PR or complete response CR determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with and without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as \>=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by \>/= 50%. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Overall Response (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Overall response in the overall study population was defined as percentage of participants with partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without positron emission tomography (PET). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as \>=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by \>/= 50%; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Complete Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Percentage of participants with complete response in the follicular lymphoma population was determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Complete Response (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Percentage of participants with complete response in the overall study population was determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Overall Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Overall response in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as percentage of participants with PR or complete response CR determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as \>=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by \>/= 50%. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Overall Response (Overall Study Population), IRC-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Overall response in the overall study population was defined as percentage of participants with PR or CR determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as \>=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by \>/= 50%; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Complete Response (Follicular Lymphoma Population), IRC-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Percentage of participants with complete response in the follicular lymphoma population was determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Complete Response (Overall Study Population), IRC-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Percentage of participants with complete response in the overall study population was determined on the basis of IRC assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI with or without PET. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline up to end of induction period (up to approximately 7 months)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Overall Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Overall survival in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Reported is the percentage of participants with event.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline up to 10 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Overall Survival (Overall Study Population)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Overall survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Reported is the percentage of participants with event.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Event-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Event-free survival in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date to disease progression/relapse, death from any cause, or initiation of a new anti-lymphoma treatment (NALT) on the basis of investigator assessment assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. Reported is the percentage of participants with an event.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline up to 10 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Event-Free Survival (Overall Study Population)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Event-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date to disease progression/relapse, death from any cause, or initiation of a new anti-lymphoma treatment (NALT) on the basis of investigator assessment assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Tumor measurements were obtained by CT/MRI. Reported is the percentage of participants with event.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Disease-Free Survival (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Disease-free survival in the follicular lymphoma population was defined as the time from the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR to the date of disease progression/ relapse, or death from any cause for the subgroup of participants with a response of CR at any time prior to NALT on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (RRCML). Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Reported is the percentage of participants with event.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
From first occurrence of documented CR to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Disease-Free Survival (Overall Study Population)
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Disease-free survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from the date of the first occurrence of a documented CR to the date of disease progression/ relapse, or death from any cause for the subgroup of participants with a response of CR at any time prior to NALT on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm. Reported is the percentage of participants with event.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
From first occurrence of documented CR to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR) (Follicular Lymphoma Population), Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to disease progression/relapse, or death from any cause for participants with a response of CR or PR any time prior to NALT based on RRCML. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as \>/=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by \>/= 50%. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
From first occurrence of documented CR or PR to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR) (Overall Study Population), Investigator-Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first occurrence of a documented CR or PR to disease progression/relapse, or death from any cause for participants with a response of CR or PR any time prior to NALT based on RRCML. Tumor assessments were performed with CT/MRI. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as \>/=50% decrease target lesions in up to six dominant lesions identified at baseline, no new lesions and no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, or other nodes. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by \>/= 50%. Progression/relapse was defined as at least 50% increase in nodal lesions or \>/=50% increase in any node \> 1 centimeter (cm) or \>/= 50% increase in other target measurable lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules) and/or appearance of any new bone marrow involvement and/or appearance of any new lesion \> 1.5 cm or \>/= 50% increase in any previously involved node with a diameter \</= 1 cm such that it is now \>1.5 cm.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
From first occurrence of documented CR or PR to data cut-off (up to approximately 4 years and 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Time to Next Anti-Lymphoma Treatment (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the start date of the next anti-lymphoma treatment or death from any cause. Reported is the percentage of participants with event.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline up to 10 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Time to Next Anti-Lymphoma Treatment (Overall Study Population)
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the start date of the next anti-lymphoma treatment or death from any cause. Reported is the percentage of participants with event.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline up to data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline up to 10 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Change From Baseline in All Domains of FACT-G (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
FACT-G consists of the following 4 FACT-Lym sub-questionnaires: Physical Well-being (range: 0-28), Social/Family Well-being (range: 0-28), Emotional Well-being (range: 0-24) and Functional Well-being (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Maint = Maintenance period.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Change From Baseline in FACT-Lym Total Outcome Index (TOI) Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population)
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The FACT-Lym TOI Score for the follicular lymphoma population was derived from the following 3 individual FACT-Lym questionnaire subscale scores: Physical Well-being (range: 0-28), Functional Well-being (range: 0-28) and Lymphoma (range: 0-60). The FACT-Lym TOI Score is the sum of the 3 individual subscales (range 0-116). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Change From Baseline in FACT-Lym Individual Subscale Lymphoma Score (Follicular Population)
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
The FACT-Lym Individual Subscale Lymphoma Score for the follicular lymphoma population was derived from the Lymphoma subscale questionnaire (range: 0-60). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Total Score (Follicular Population)
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
The FACT-Lym Total Score for the follicular lymphoma population was derived from the following 5 individual FACT-Lym questionnaire subscale scores: Physical Well-being (range: 0-28), Social/Family Well-being (range: 0-28), Emotional Well-being (range: 0-24),Functional Well-being (range: 0-28) and Lymphoma (range: 0-60). The FACT-Lym Total Score is the sum of all 5 individual subscales (range 0-168). Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Baseline (Induction Cycle 1, Day 1), data cut-off (up to approximately 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Induction Phase
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire with five questions, each with three categories (no problem, moderate problem, severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state. Summary score ranges from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Completion (Compl) includes completion visit and early termination visit. Maintenance/Observation is indicated as Maint/Obs.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Induction: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Cycle 3 Day 1, End of Induction (up to 7 months); Maintenance: 2, 12 months after Day 1 of last induction cycle, Follow-up: every year up to data cut-off (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Maintenance/Observation Phase
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire with five questions, each with three categories (no problem, moderate problem, severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state. Summary score ranges from 0 to 1 Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Maintenance/Observation is indicated as Maint/Obs. Completion includes completion visit and early termination visit.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Induction: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Cycle 3 Day 1, End of Induction (up to 7 months); Maintenance: 2, 12 months after Day 1 of last induction cycle, Follow-up: every year up to data cut-off (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Summary Score (Follicular Lymphoma Population) During Follow Up Phase
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire with five questions, each with three categories (no problem, moderate problem, severe problems) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state. Summary score ranges from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Maintenance/Observation is indicated as Maint/Obs in data categories. Completion includes completion visit and early termination visit.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Induction: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Cycle 3 Day 1, End of Induction (up to 7 months); Maintenance: 2, 12 after Day 1 of last induction cycle, Follow-up: every year for up to data cut-off (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20)-positive indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (follicular lymphoma or splenic, nodal or extranodal marginal zone lymphoma)
* Stage III or IV disease, or Stage II bulky disease (defined as tumor diameter greater than or equal to [>/=] 7 centimeters [cm])
* For participants with follicular lymphoma: requirement for treatment according to Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria
* For participants with symptomatic splenic, nodal, or non-gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma: disease that is de novo or has relapsed following local therapy (i.e. surgery or radiotherapy) and requires therapy as assessed by the investigator
* At least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion (greater than [>] 2 cm in its largest dimension by computed tomography [CT] scan or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI])
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
* Adequate hematologic function
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Central nervous system lymphoma, leptomeningeal lymphoma, or histological evidence of transformation to a high-grade or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
* Grade 3b follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma or Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia
* Ann Arbor Stage I disease
* History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibody therapy
* Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or sensitivity to murine products, or history of sensitivity to mannitol
* For participants with follicular lymphoma: prior treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy
* For participants with non-follicular lymphoma: prior treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy
* Regular treatment with corticosteroids during the 4 weeks prior to the start of Cycle 1
* Evidence of significant, uncontrolled concomitant diseases that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results
* For participants who will be receiving cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP): left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than (<) 50% by multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram
* History of prior other malignancy with the exception of curatively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix at any time prior to study
* Known active infection, or major episode of infection within 4 week prior to the start of Cycle 1
* Vaccination with a live vaccine within 28 days prior to randomization
* Recent major surgery (within 4 weeks prior to start of Cycle 1), other than for diagnosis
* Abnormal laboratory values as defined by protocol for creatinine, creatinine clearance, aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin, international normalized ration (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPPT), unless these abnormalities are due to underlying lymphoma
* Positive test results for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV1), hepatitis C or chronic hepatitis B
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Life expectancy <12 months
* Participation in another clinical trial with drug intervention within 28 days prior to start of Cycle 1 and during study
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
6/07/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/07/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1401
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Concord Repatriation General Hospital; Haematology - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Westmead Hospital; Haematology - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba; Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
St Vincent'S Hospital; Haematology - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Department of Haematology - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre; Cancer Services - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Monash Medical Centre; Haematology - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Fiona Stanley Hospital - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2139 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2145 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3002 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3084 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
3168 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
6150 - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Montana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Kortrijk
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
New Brunswick
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Beijing City
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Changchun
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Fuzhou City
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Guangzhou
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Harbin
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Nanjing City
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Nanjing
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Shanghai City
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Wuhan
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Praha 2
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Helsinki
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Angers
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Brest
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Clermont Ferrand
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
LeMans
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Montpellier
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Perpignan
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Chemnitz
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Dessau-Roßlau
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Erfurt
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Eschweiler
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Greifswald
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Göttingen
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Hagen
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Hannover
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Homburg/Saar
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Jena
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Koblenz
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Landshut
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Lebach
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Ludwigshafen
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Magdeburg
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Mainz
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Mannheim
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Mutlangen
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Mönchengladbach
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Neunkirchen/Saar
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Oldenburg
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Paderborn
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Recklinghausen
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Regensburg
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Saarbruecken
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Trier
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Tübingen
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Ulm
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Wiesbaden
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Würzburg
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Gyor
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Szeged
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Petach Tikva
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Ramat-Gan
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Lazio
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Marche
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Sicilia
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Veneto
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Aomori
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Ehime
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Gunma
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Kumamoto
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Kyoto
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Miyagi
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Nagano
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Niigata
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Tochigi
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Nizhny Novgorod
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Petrozavodsk
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Vizcaya
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Göteborg
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Taipei City
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Taoyuan
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
Aberdeen
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Bournemouth
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Bristol
Query!
Country [125]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [125]
0
0
Cambridge
Query!
Country [126]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [126]
0
0
Canterbury
Query!
Country [127]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [127]
0
0
Cardiff
Query!
Country [128]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [128]
0
0
Cottingham
Query!
Country [129]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [129]
0
0
Edinburgh
Query!
Country [130]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [130]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Country [131]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [131]
0
0
Great Yarmouth
Query!
Country [132]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [132]
0
0
Harlow
Query!
Country [133]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [133]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [134]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [134]
0
0
Leicester
Query!
Country [135]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [135]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [136]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [136]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [137]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [137]
0
0
Norwich
Query!
Country [138]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [138]
0
0
Nottingham
Query!
Country [139]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [139]
0
0
Oxford
Query!
Country [140]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [140]
0
0
Portsmouth
Query!
Country [141]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [141]
0
0
Southampton
Query!
Country [142]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [142]
0
0
Sutton
Query!
Country [143]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [143]
0
0
Swansea
Query!
Country [144]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [144]
0
0
Swindon
Query!
Country [145]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [145]
0
0
Truro
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This open-label, randomized study will assess the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab (RO5072759) in combination with chemotherapy compared to rituximab (MabThera/Rituxan) with chemotherapy followed by obinutuzumab or rituximab maintenance in participants with untreated advanced indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. After the end of the induction period, participants achieving response (Complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]) will undergo a maintenance period continuing on the randomized antibody treatment alone every 2 months until disease progression for a total of 2 years. Anticipated time on study treatment is up to approximately 2.5 years. After maintenance or observation, participants will be followed for 5 years until progression. After progression, participants will be followed for new anti-lymphoma therapy and overall survival until the end of the study.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01332968
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Casulo C, Herold M, Hiddemann W, Iyengar S, Marcus RE, Seymour JF, Launonen A, Knapp A, Nielsen TG, Mir F. Risk Factors for and Outcomes of Follicular Lymphoma Histological Transformation at First Progression in the GALLIUM Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Jan;23(1):40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Oct 4. Hong X, Song Y, Shi Y, Zhang Q, Guo W, Wu G, Li J, Feng J, Kinkolykh A, Knapp A, Lin T. Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma: a subgroup analysis of Chinese patients enrolled in the phase III GALLIUM study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Sep 16;135(4):433-440. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001737. Strefford JC, Nowicka M, Hargreaves CE, Burton C, Davies A, Ganderton R, Hiddemann W, Iriyama C, Klapper W, Latham KV, Martelli M, Mir F, Parker H, Potter KN, Rose-Zerilli MJJ, Sehn LH, Trneny M, Vitolo U, Bolen CR, Klein C, Knapp A, Oestergaard MZ, Cragg MS. Single-nucleotide Fcgamma receptor polymorphisms do not impact obinutuzumab/rituximab outcome in patients with lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2021 Aug 10;5(15):2935-2944. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003985. Davies A, Trask P, Demeter J, Florschutz A, Hanel M, Kinoshita T, Pettengell R, Quach H, Robinson S, Sadullah S, Sancho JM, Udvardy M, Witzens-Harig M, Knapp A, Liu W. Health-related quality of life in the phase III GALLIUM study of obinutuzumab- or rituximab-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2020 Dec;99(12):2837-2846. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04021-6. Epub 2020 Apr 20. Klanova M, Oestergaard MZ, Trneny M, Hiddemann W, Marcus R, Sehn LH, Vitolo U, Bazeos A, Goede V, Zeuner H, Knapp A, Sahin D, Spielewoy N, Bolen CR, Cardona A, Klein C, Venstrom JM, Nielsen T, Fingerle-Rowson G. Prognostic Impact of Natural Killer Cell Count in Follicular Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients Treated with Immunochemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 1;25(15):4634-4643. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3270. Epub 2019 May 3. Kusumoto S, Arcaini L, Hong X, Jin J, Kim WS, Kwong YL, Peters MG, Tanaka Y, Zelenetz AD, Kuriki H, Fingerle-Rowson G, Nielsen T, Ueda E, Piper-Lepoutre H, Sellam G, Tobinai K. Risk of HBV reactivation in patients with B-cell lymphomas receiving obinutuzumab or rituximab immunochemotherapy. Blood. 2019 Jan 10;133(2):137-146. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-04-848044. Epub 2018 Oct 19. Trotman J, Barrington SF, Belada D, Meignan M, MacEwan R, Owen C, Ptacnik V, Rosta A, Fingerle-Rowson GR, Zhu J, Nielsen T, Sahin D, Hiddemann W, Marcus RE, Davies A; PET investigators from the GALLIUM study. Prognostic value of end-of-induction PET response after first-line immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma (GALLIUM): secondary analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1530-1542. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30618-1. Epub 2018 Oct 8. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jun;20(6):e293. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30280-3. Hiddemann W, Barbui AM, Canales MA, Cannell PK, Collins GP, Durig J, Forstpointner R, Herold M, Hertzberg M, Klanova M, Radford J, Seymour JF, Tobinai K, Trotman J, Burciu A, Fingerle-Rowson G, Wolbers M, Nielsen T, Marcus RE. Immunochemotherapy With Obinutuzumab or Rituximab for Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma in the GALLIUM Study: Influence of Chemotherapy on Efficacy and Safety. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 10;36(23):2395-2404. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8960. Epub 2018 Jun 1. Marcus R, Davies A, Ando K, Klapper W, Opat S, Owen C, Phillips E, Sangha R, Schlag R, Seymour JF, Townsend W, Trneny M, Wenger M, Fingerle-Rowson G, Rufibach K, Moore T, Herold M, Hiddemann W. Obinutuzumab for the First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1331-1344. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614598.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/68/NCT01332968/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/68/NCT01332968/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01332968
Download to PDF