The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01346592




Registration number
NCT01346592
Ethics application status
Date submitted
30/04/2011
Date registered
3/05/2011
Date last updated
26/03/2015

Titles & IDs
Public title
Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the Adjuvanted Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine and the Non-Adjuvanted Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine Compared to the Non-Adjuvanted Trivalent Split Influenza Vaccine in Children 6 to < 72 Months of Age
Scientific title
A Phase III, Observer-Blind, Randomized, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Fluad and Agriflu Compared to the Non-adjuvanted Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Fluzone in Children 6 to < 72 Months of Age
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
V70_29
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Influenza Disease 0 0
Condition category
Condition code

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Other interventions - Trivalent split influenza vaccine (TIV)
Other interventions - MF59-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV)
Other interventions - Licensed comparator trivalent split influenza vaccine (comparator TIV)

Active Comparator: aTIV (6 to <72 months) - Subjects received an investigational MF59-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV), subjects aged between 6 to <36 months received two doses of 0.25 mL each, while subjects aged =36 months received two doses of 0.5 mL each, at Days 1 & 29

Active Comparator: Comparator TIV (6 to <72 months) - Subjects received a licensed comparator trivalent split influenza vaccine (comparator TIV), subjects aged between 6 to <36 months received two doses of 0.25 mL each, while subjects aged =36 months received two doses of 0.5 mL each, at Days 1 & 29

Active Comparator: TIV (6 to <72 months) - Subjects received an investigational trivalent split influenza vaccine (TIV), subjects aged between 6 to <36 months received two doses of 0.25 mL each, while subjects aged =36 months received two doses of 0.5 mL each, at Days 1 & 29


Other interventions: Trivalent split influenza vaccine (TIV)


Other interventions: MF59-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV)


Other interventions: Licensed comparator trivalent split influenza vaccine (comparator TIV)


Intervention code [1] 0 0
Other interventions
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Homologous Strains
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Day 1, Day 50
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4-fold Increase in HI Titers Against Homologous Strains
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Day 50
Primary outcome [3] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of TIV Versus Comparator TIV in Terms of Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Homologous Strains (6 to <36 Months)
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Day 1, Day 50
Primary outcome [4] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of TIV Versus Comparator TIV in Terms of Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4-fold Increase in HI Titer Against Homologous Strains in Subjects 6 to <36 Months of Age
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Day 50
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of GMTs Against Homologous Strains (6 to <24 Months)
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Day 1, Day 50
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4-fold Increase in HI Titer Against Homologous Strains (6 to <24 Months)
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Day 50
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of GMTs Against Homologous Strains (6 to <72 Months)-FAS
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Day 1, Day 50
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4 Fold Increase in HI Titers Against Homologous Strains (6 to <72 Months)-FAS
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Day 50
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
The HI GMTs Against Homologous Strains, by Vaccine Group
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Day 1, Day 29, Day 50, Day 209
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of Post- Versus Pre-vaccination HI Titers Against Homologous Strains
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Day 29, Day 50, Day 209
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Percentage of Subjects With HI Titers =40 Against Homologous Strains, by Vaccine Group
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Day 1, Day 29, Day 50, Day 209
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4 Fold Increase in HI Titers, Against Homologous Strains
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Day 29, Day 50, Day 209
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of GMTs Against Homologous Strains, Subjects at Risk/Not at Risk, by Age Subgroup
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Day 50
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV Versus Comparator TIV and TIV in Terms of Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4-fold Increase in HI Titer Against Homologous Strains in Subjects at Risk/Not at Risk, by Age Subgroup
Timepoint [10] 0 0
Day 50
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of TIV Versus Comparator TIV in Terms of Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4-fold Increase in HI Titer Against Homologous Strains in Subjects at Risk/Not at Risk, by Age Sub Group-FAS
Timepoint [11] 0 0
Day 50
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of GMTs Against Homologous Strains, at Risk/Not at Risk, by Age Sub Group-FAS
Timepoint [12] 0 0
Day 50
Secondary outcome [13] 0 0
The HI GMTs Against Heterologous Strains, by Vaccine Group (6 to <72 Months Age Group)
Timepoint [13] 0 0
Day 1, Day 50, Day 209
Secondary outcome [14] 0 0
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion or =4 Fold Increase in HI Titers, Against Heterologous Strains
Timepoint [14] 0 0
Day 50, Day 209
Secondary outcome [15] 0 0
Comparison of Antibody Responses of aTIV With TIV and Comparator TIV in Terms of GMTs Against Homologous Strains, After One Vaccination
Timepoint [15] 0 0
Day 1, Day 29
Secondary outcome [16] 0 0
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events After Vaccination
Timepoint [16] 0 0
Day 1 through Day 7 after any vaccination
Secondary outcome [17] 0 0
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events After Vaccination
Timepoint [17] 0 0
Day 1 to Day 394

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1.Children 6 months to 72 months of age.
Minimum age
6 Months
Maximum age
72 Months
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Key exclusion criteria
Children

1. Who had been hospitalized at the time of enrollment

2. Who had any serious reaction or hypersensitivity to any vaccine component, eggs, or
chicken protein

3. Who had known impairment of the immune function

4. Who had fever interfering with normal daily activities at the time of enrollment

5. Who had received licensed vaccines within 14 days (for inactivated vaccines) or 28
days (for live vaccines) prior to enrollment in the study

6. Concomitant participation in another clinical study

7. Who had surgery planned during the study period that in the investigator's opinion
would have interfered with the study visits schedule.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
206 Vaccine and Immunology Research Trials Unit University Department of Paediatrics 2nd floor Clarence Reiger Bldg Womens and Childrens Hospital - Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
201 Royal Children Hospital Department of Respiratory Medicine - Herston
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
205 Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group Murdoch Childrens Research Institute School Of Population Health - Level 5 207 Bouverie St
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
202 Sydney Children Hospital Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Randwick
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
204 National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance Kids Research Institute The Childrens Hospital at Westmead - Westmead
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
5006 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
4029 - Herston
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
- Level 5 207 Bouverie St
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
2031 - Randwick
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
2145 - Westmead
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [1] 0 0
Buenos Aires
Country [2] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [2] 0 0
Cordoba
Country [3] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [3] 0 0
Cuidad Automa de Beunos Aires
Country [4] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [4] 0 0
Guaymallen
Country [5] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [5] 0 0
Mendoza
Country [6] 0 0
Chile
State/province [6] 0 0
Santiago
Country [7] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [7] 0 0
Cavite
Country [8] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [8] 0 0
Dbbb Dasmarinas Cavite
Country [9] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [9] 0 0
Manila
Country [10] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [10] 0 0
Muntinlupa
Country [11] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [11] 0 0
Quezon City
Country [12] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [12] 0 0
Quezon
Country [13] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [13] 0 0
Benoni
Country [14] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [14] 0 0
Johannesburg
Country [15] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [15] 0 0
Pretoria
Country [16] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [16] 0 0
Soweto

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Name
Novartis Vaccines
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
This Study Aims to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the Adjuvanted
Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine and the Non-Adjuvanted Trivalent Subunit Influenza
Vaccine Compared to the Non-Adjuvanted Trivalent Split Influenza Vaccine in Children 6 to <
72 Months of Age.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01346592
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Novartis Vaccines
Address 0 0
Novartis Vaccines
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01346592