Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000674033
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
27/04/2010
Date registered
17/08/2010
Date last updated
17/08/2010
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Need for dialysis access procedures among patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis
Query!
Scientific title
Among patients who choose between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, does the initial access type influence access related adverse events?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
252466
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
end stage renal disease
243773
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital
256832
256832
0
0
Query!
Kidney disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Incident patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) who are eligible for both are offerred peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD). The PD group has access to up to two nursing visits a day to assisted with PD (primarily cycler PD).
Peritoneal dialysis is treatment by continuous ambulatory PD or automated PD.
Hemodialysis is intermittent treatments usually three times per week but patients could receive more treatments per week if clinically indicated.
Observation was from the start of dialysis to the end of dialysis (transplant, death) or lost to follow-up or end of the study.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
257025
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients who receive any form of chronic hemodialysis as their treatment modality including incenter, satellite, or home dialysis.
Observation was from the start of dialysis to the end of dialysis (transplant, death) or lost to follow-up or end of the study. The minimum follow-up was six months. The mean follow-up is likely to be about 1.5 years.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
240842
0
The rate of invasive procedures to maintain access for dialysis. Primary nurse review the medical record every 3 months and record any invasive access procedures that occurred into a web-based database that is double reviewed by the investigators. All procedures must be referenced to medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
240842
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
240842
0
Observation was from the start of dialysis to the end of dialysis (transplant, death) or lost to follow-up or end of the study. It varied only depending on the above events and is not likely to vary much per group.
Study follow-up is variable - minimum follow-up is six months
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
259001
0
Number of invasive access procedures
Query!
Assessment method [2]
259001
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
259001
0
Minimum follow-up is 6 months. Median follow-up should be approximately 1.5 years.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
257512
0
Access-related hospitalizations. Nurses entered invasive interventions, hospitalizations (duration and reason for admission) and death every three months based on reviewing the medical record. All data was reviewed by investigators every three months using a web-based system to ensure outcomes were recorded using a standardized classification system. The primary sources of data were surgical and radiological procedure notes and discharge summaries but the entire medical record could be reviewed as necessary. If the cause was not clear during the review process every three months it will be arbritrated by the two investigators at the end of the study. It was not blinded because the knowledge of first access attempted (fistula, PD catheter, or HD catheter) was often known at the time of the event.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
257512
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
257512
0
Minimum follow-up is 6 months. Median follow-up should be approximately 1.5 years.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
265231
0
Access-related death
Query!
Assessment method [2]
265231
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
265231
0
Minimum follow-up is 6 months. Median follow-up should be approximately 1.5 years.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1) Written or verbal diagnosis of stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease by nephrologist initiated dialysis therapy
3) Eligible for both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.
3) Lives in region and residence where home care assistance for peritoneal dialysis is available.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
120
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1) Determined to be a prevalent (not incident) dialysis patient defined as having received dialysis for greater than three months any time prior to assessment or having received a previous kidney transplant
2) Died, withdrew from dialysis, or moved out of region prior to completing multidisciplinary assessment
3) Recovered renal function and discontinued dialysis
4) Refused to participate in a complete multidisciplinary assessment for modality eligibility
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/07/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
412
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2095
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [1]
2095
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
243675
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
243675
0
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Query!
Address [1]
243675
0
160 Elgin Street, 9th Floor
Address Locator 4809A
Ottawa, ON, K1A 0W9
Query!
Country [1]
243675
0
Canada
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Query!
Name
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Query!
Address
160 Elgin Street, 9th Floor
Address Locator 4809A
Ottawa, ON, K1A 0W9
Query!
Country
Canada
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251706
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
251706
0
Minstry of Health and Long Term Care of Ontario
Query!
Address [1]
251706
0
M-1B114, Macdonald Block
900 Bay Street
Toronto ON M7A 1N3
Canada
Query!
Country [1]
251706
0
Canada
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
256703
0
None
Query!
Name [2]
256703
0
Query!
Address [2]
256703
0
Query!
Country [2]
256703
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary aim of this study is to compare the risk of access-related procedures between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis Procedures to maintain access to the peritoneum or the bloodstream are important measures of safety because they are caused by complications that “require intervention in order to prevent permanent impairment or damage”. This usually meets the definition of a serious adverse event because loss of access is a life-threatening event for a chronic dialysis patient.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
M. J. Oliver, R. R. Quinn, E. P. Richardson, A. J. Kiss, D. L. Lamping, and B. J. Manns. Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 71 (7):673-678, 2007. M. J. Oliver, A. X. Garg, P. G. Blake, J. F. Johnson, M. Verrelli, J. M. Zacharias, S. Pandeya, and R. R. Quinn. Impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. Nephrol.Dial.Transplant., 2010. V. R. Williams, R. Quinn, S. Callery, A. Kiss, and M. J. Oliver. The impact of treatment modality on infection-related hospitalization rates in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis Perit.Dial.Int., 2010.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30227
0
Query!
Address
30227
0
Query!
Country
30227
0
Query!
Phone
30227
0
Query!
Fax
30227
0
Query!
Email
30227
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13474
0
Matthew J. Oliver
Query!
Address
13474
0
Room A239 2075 Bayview Avenue Toronto ON M4N 3M5
Query!
Country
13474
0
Canada
Query!
Phone
13474
0
+1 416-480-4755
Query!
Fax
13474
0
Query!
Email
13474
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4402
0
Matthew J. Oliver
Query!
Address
4402
0
Room A239
2075 Bayview Avenue Toronto ON
M4N 3M5
Query!
Country
4402
0
Canada
Query!
Phone
4402
0
+1 416-480-4755
Query!
Fax
4402
0
Query!
Email
4402
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF