Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000941268
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
21/10/2009
Date registered
3/11/2009
Date last updated
9/07/2012
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Sub bandage pressures of straight tubular three layer (3L) bandages and short stretch (SS) bandage in healthy volunteers.
Query!
Scientific title
An open label, prospective single factor crossover design to measure and compare the sub bandage pressures of a graduated three layer straight tubular (3L) bandaging system and standard short stretch (SS) compression bandaging system in healthy volunteers.
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
venous leg ulcers
252042
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Skin
252232
252232
0
0
Query!
Other skin conditions
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
3L (elastic) Tubular bandaging was used in three graduated lengths of 3 layers as follows:
1. from base of toes to just under knee (long layer)
2. from base of toes to above calf pump (medium layer)
3. from base of toes to mid gaiter (short layer)
This study is a within person sub bandage comparison.Participants will have an elastic bandage applied to one limb and the inelastic bandage applied to the other limb. All layers will be applied at the same time and measured with a sub bandage pressure measurement instrument. Participant legs randomised to either control compression bandage or to the intervention compression bandage. Eg. right leg randomised to control or intervention bandage. The overall duration of this trial is one day. There is no washout period.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
241439
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
SS (Inelastic): Standard short stretch compression therapy consists of:
1. A padding layer
2. 10cm inelastic short stretch compression bandage
3. A tubular support bandage
All layers of standard compression therapy were applied from base of toes to just under the knee. All layers applied at same time. Participant legs will be randomised to either control compression bandage or to the intervention compression bandage. Eg. right leg randomised to control or intervention bandage The overall duration of this trial is one day.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
253101
0
To estimate the magnitude of difference in mean sub-bandage pressure of 3L (elastic) and SS (inelastic) compression bandage systems at rest, standing , exercise and recovery.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
253101
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
253101
0
Six quantitative outcome measures were defined between the two bandage systems: (i)-(iv) the difference in mean sub-bandage pressure during each of four activities; (v) the difference in stiffness parameter ; and (vi) the difference in amplitude of sub -bandage pressure (SBP) during the exercise activity. The outcome was measured during the intervention at 0.25 second intervals for entire 90 seconds for each participant.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
253103
0
To estimate the difference in mean stiffness parameter (SP) between bandage types.
To estimate the difference in mean amplitude of sub-bandage pressure during exercise between bandage systems.
The outcome was measured during the intervention at 0.25 second intervals for entire 90 seconds for each participant.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
253103
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
253103
0
Six quantitative outcome measures were defined between the two bandage systems: (i)-(iv) the difference in mean sub-bandage pressure during each of four activities; (v) the difference in stiffness parameter ; and (vi) the difference in amplitude of SBP during the exercise activity.
The outcome was measured during the intervention at 0.25 second intervals for entire 90 seconds for each participant.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
253104
0
To estimate the difference in mean amplitude of sub-bandage pressure during exercise between bandage systems.
The outcome was measured during the intervention at 0.25 second intervals for entire 90 seconds for each participant.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
253104
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
253104
0
Six quantitative outcome measures were defined between the two bandage systems: (i)-(iv) the difference in mean sub-bandage pressure during each of four activities; (v) the difference in stiffness parameter ; and (vi) the difference in amplitude of SBP during the exercise activity
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
257973
0
NIL
Query!
Assessment method [1]
257973
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
257973
0
NIL
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Aged over 18
Have a palpable dorsalis pedis pulse
Ankle circumference equal to or greater than 20 cm and less than 30 cm on both legs
Ambulant
Able to give Informed Consent
Able to understand and comply with the requirements of the trial
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Any lesions on either lower limb
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Randomisation was stratified by person. One of each type of bandage (elastic or inelastic) was randomised to either right or left leg for each participant. Randomisation followed a computer generated allocation schedule to ensure that elastic and inelastic bandages were allocated equally between right and left legs in each participant. Participants were unaware of prior treatment assignment.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Sequence randomisation was achieved by using a computer generated algorithm.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
An open-label, prospective single factor crossover randomised clinically controlled trial.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
26/03/2009
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
243910
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
243910
0
Monash UNiversity
Query!
Address [1]
243910
0
Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine
Monash University
School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine
The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Australia
3rd floor, Burnet Tower
89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Query!
Country [1]
243910
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Carolina Weller
Query!
Address
Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine
Monash University
School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine
The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Australia
3rd floor, Burnet Tower
89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251255
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
251255
0
Query!
Address [1]
251255
0
Query!
Country [1]
251255
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
244024
0
Monash University Standing Committee on Ethics in Research involving Humans (SCERH)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
244024
0
Monash University Building 3E Clayton campus Wellington road Clayton VIC 3800
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
244024
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
244024
0
23/03/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
244024
0
26/03/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
244024
0
2009000388
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
To compare the interface sub-bandage pressure between two multilayer compression bandage systems during supine position, standing, exercise and recovery. Alternate hypothesis: The difference between mean Sub bandage pressure of elastic and inealstic bandage compression systems exceeds 10 mmHg.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30406
0
Query!
Address
30406
0
Query!
Country
30406
0
Query!
Phone
30406
0
Query!
Fax
30406
0
Query!
Email
30406
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13653
0
carolina weller
Query!
Address
13653
0
Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine
Monash University
School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine
The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Australia
3rd floor, Burnet Tower
89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Query!
Country
13653
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
13653
0
+61 03 99030623
Query!
Fax
13653
0
Query!
Email
13653
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4581
0
carolina Weller
Query!
Address
4581
0
Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine
Monash University
School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine
The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Australia
3rd floor, Burnet Tower
89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004
Query!
Country
4581
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
4581
0
+61 03 99030623
Query!
Fax
4581
0
Query!
Email
4581
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF