Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000948099
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/11/2010
Date registered
5/11/2010
Date last updated
23/02/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Conservative Management vs Plate Fixation. A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of DASH scores at 1 year post injury in patients aged 16-60yrs with a displaced fracture of the midshaft of the clavicle treated by non-operative care compared with those treated with plate fixation of the clavicle
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
252650
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
The optimal management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures
252063
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents
252264
252264
0
0
Query!
Fractures
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Surgical management of the fracture involving open reduction and internal fixation using a plate.
The operation will be performed at the earliest available time after the patient has been randomised. On average the operation will take between 60 and 90 minutes to perform. The operation will only be performed once on each patient unless there are complications requiring further surgery.
Post operatively the patients will be seen by a physiotherapist and given a guided 16 week physiotherapy program, exactly the same as that given to the control candidates. They will commence this on the day following their operation
Query!
Intervention code [1]
241457
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Conservative management: sling and physiotherapy guided rehabilitation program.
This is a 16 week program consisting of progressive range of motion exercises in the initial four weeks, then introducing strengthening exercises from week five onwards.
The patient will be seen by a trained physiotherapist who will give the patient a sheet of exercises and will supervise the patient for a 30 minute session to practice them. The patient will be instructed to perform the exercises daily at home. They will be seen every 1-2 weeks by the physiotherapist for a 30 minute session to ensure that they are managing the exercises and to be supplied with new ones as they advance through the program
This program is the same as the one given to the patients in the Intervention arm.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
253135
0
Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) functional scores
This is a short questionnaire completed by the patient that asks questions about the functional status of the patients upper limb.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
253135
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
253135
0
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
262013
0
Constant Shoulder outcome score
This is an assessment completed by the surgeon at the time of their follow up visits that scores objective measures of shoulder function, primarily strength and range of motion
Query!
Assessment method [1]
262013
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
262013
0
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
262014
0
Radiographic fracture union
Defined as the presence of bridging trabeculae accross the fracture site on plain X rays. The x rays are taken at follow up visits until union has been demonstrated. They are reviewed by the treating surgical team.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
262014
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
262014
0
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
262015
0
Complications of treatment
These are identified at the standardised follow up visits by asking the patient and reviewing the notes. The Follow Up data collection form specifically asks abou the presence or absence of a list of defined complications: wound problems requiring treatment, non union, symptomatic malunion and complex regional pain syndrome.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
262015
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
262015
0
Recorded at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
262016
0
Return to work
At each follow up visit the patient is asked for the date that they returned to work. Once this date has been recorded it does not need to be re-recorded on subsequent visits.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
262016
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
262016
0
Date of return to work recorded at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
ALL of following
1. Completely displaced midshaft clavicle fracture
2. Fracture amenable to plate fixation (3 screws either side of fracture)
3.No medical contraindications to general anaesthesia
4.Able to provide informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
ANY of the following
1. Age <16 or >60yrs
2. Fracture of proximal or distal 1/3 of clavicle
3. Pathological fracture
4. Open fracture
5. Fracture seen >28 days after injury
6. Associated neurovascular injury
7. Associated head injury (= GCS<12)
8. Upper extremity fracture distal to the shoulder
9. Inability to comply with follow up
10. Medical contraindication to general anaesthesia
11. Inability to provide consent
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Eligible patients enrolled at presentation to the acute Orthopaedic services of the participating centres. Treatment group will be allocated by centrally based randomisation, using opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computerised sequence generation stratified by centre
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Withdrawn
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2011
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
138
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
0
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2297
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
2297
0
Wellington
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257614
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
257614
0
Wishbone Trust
Query!
Address [1]
257614
0
C/o NZ Orthopaedic Association
PO Box 7451
Wellington 6242
New Zealand
Query!
Country [1]
257614
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Wellington Hospital Orthopaedic Unit
Query!
Address
Wellington Hospital
Capital & Coast District Health Board
Riddiford Street
Newtown
Wellington 6021
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256836
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
256836
0
N/A
Query!
Address [1]
256836
0
N/A
Query!
Country [1]
256836
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
244039
0
New Zealand Multi Region Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
244039
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
244039
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
244039
0
01/12/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
244039
0
19/04/2011
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
244039
0
MEC 10/12/120
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary purpose of the study is to identify whether the clinical outcomes of mid-shaft clavicle fractures treated with an operation involving fixation with a plate and then physiotherapy are superior to those treated with physiotherapy alone. The study hypothesis is that there will be no difference in outcomes between the two groups at one year after their injury and subsequent treatment.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30420
0
Dr Harry Clitherow
Query!
Address
30420
0
c/o Hutt Valley District Health Board Hutt Hospital, High Street, Lower Hutt Private Bag 31-907 Lower Hutt 5010
Query!
Country
30420
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
30420
0
+64 4 566 6999
Query!
Fax
30420
0
Query!
Email
30420
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13667
0
Dr Harry Stracey-Clitherow
Query!
Address
13667
0
c/o Hutt Valley District Health Board
Hutt Hospital, High Street, Lower Hutt
Private Bag 31-907
Lower Hutt
5010
Query!
Country
13667
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
13667
0
+64 4 566 6999
Query!
Fax
13667
0
Query!
Email
13667
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4595
0
Dr Harry Stracey-Clitherow
Query!
Address
4595
0
c/o Hutt Valley District Health Board
Hutt Hospital, High Street, Lower Hutt
Private Bag 31-907
Lower Hutt
5010
Query!
Country
4595
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
4595
0
+64 4 566 6999
Query!
Fax
4595
0
Query!
Email
4595
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF