Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000968279
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/11/2009
Date registered
9/11/2009
Date last updated
9/07/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating Possible Additive Analgesic
Effects of Paracetamol in Palliative Patients using Low-dose Strong Opioids
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating Possible Additive Analgesic
Effects of Paracetamol in Palliative Patients using Low-dose Strong Opioids
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
1126
0
NIL
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
BSPCC_RCT_Paracetamol2
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Analgesic benefits of paracetamol for palliative patients using low-dose strong opioids
252101
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
252307
252307
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
All patients will receive five days of paracetamol (two 500mg tablets per oral four times a day) and five days of an identical appearing placebo. The primary outcome, pain, will be assessed subjectively by patients completing a daily diary ( of numerical ratings of pain on an 11 point Likert-type scale with values ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (unbearable), for each of the 5 days of both treatments. In addition, the numbers of breakthrough medications used each day will be recorded. Secondary outcomes of subjective ratings of nausea and vomiting, cognitive impairment (drowsiness and unclear thinking), constipation and overall feeling of well-being will also be assessed using 11 point Likert-type scales. A one day washout period dictates that only data from the last four days of each treatment arm will be analysed to exclude the influence of possible carryover effects.
At the completion of the study patients will be asked to rank their global satisfaction with the two treatments. They will be given the option of continuing with paracetamol and asked the reason for their choice.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
241494
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients will receive 5 days of active treatment (two oral 500mg tablets) followed by 5 days of identical appearing placebo only without the active ingredient or vice versa, thus each patient acts as their own control
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
253181
0
Mean difference in pain ratings as rated on an 11 point Likert-type scale over the 2 treatment arms
Query!
Assessment method [1]
253181
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
253181
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the 10 day trial period. Mean pain ratings over the last 4 days of the two 5 day treatment conditions (active and placebo) will be computed for each participant
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
253182
0
Mean difference in number of breakthrough / rescue medications required by each participant over the 2 treatment arms
Query!
Assessment method [2]
253182
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
253182
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the 10 day trial period and record all breakthrough / rescue medications. The mean number of breakthrough medications will be compared across treatment conditions using a paired t-test.
In addition, differences in rated pain will be further investigated controlling for number of breakthrough medications required. This is to determine whether any differences that may be found in rated pain are maintained when breakthrough medications are held constant and will be analysed in a regression analysis.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
262106
0
Mean difference in nausea /vomiting ratings as rated on an 11 point Likert-type scale over the 2 treatment arms
Query!
Assessment method [1]
262106
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
262106
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the 10 day trial period. Mean nausea/vomiting ratings over the last 4 days of the two 5 day treatment conditions (active and placebo) will be computed for each participant
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
262107
0
Mean difference in cognitive impairment ratings as rated on an 11 point Likert-type scale over the 2 treatment arms
Query!
Assessment method [2]
262107
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
262107
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the 10 day trial period. Mean cognitive impairment over the last 4 days of the two 5 day treatment conditions (active and placebo) will be computed for each participant
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
262108
0
Mean difference in constipation ratings as rated on an 11 point Likert-type scale over the 2 treatment arms
Query!
Assessment method [3]
262108
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
262108
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the 10 day trial period. Mean constipation over the last 4 days of the two 5 day treatment conditions (active and placebo) will be computed for each participant
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
262109
0
Mean difference in feelings of overall well-being ratings as rated on an 11 point Likert-type scale over the 2 treatment arms
Query!
Assessment method [4]
262109
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
262109
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the 10 day trial period. Mean feeling of overall well-beingover the last 4 days of the two 5 day treatment conditions (active and placebo) will be computed for each participant
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1.Patients taking the equivalent of 50mg of oral morphine or less in a 24 hour period
2.Patients on stable (+/- 30% of total daily requirement) doses of opioid and non opioid analgesics for at least one week prior to recruitment
3.Baseline pain score greater than or equal to two
4.Prepared to take oral paracetamol (4 gm daily) if not currently prescribed
5.If currently prescribed, prepared to stop their usual dose of paracetamol and use of any breakthrough medications with a paracetamol additive
6.Ability to give informed consent in English
Mini Mental State Examination score of at least 25 out of 30 (to be repeated at 5 day intervals)
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1.Palliative patients less than 18 years of age
2.Patients whose pain is considered clinically to be primarily neuropathic
3.Patients who have received treatments in the two weeks before the study that are likely to impact on pain levels (eg radiotherapy) or who receive such therapy during the study period
4.Expected survival less than 2 weeks
5.Patients clinically jaundiced
6.Patients experiencing regular febrile events
7.Any patient who, in the researchers’ opinion, is unable to comply with the protocol
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by phone
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation using a randomisation table created by a software system
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
2175
0
4355
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
2176
0
4113
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
2177
0
4350
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
2178
0
4114
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
2179
0
4129
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
2180
0
4131
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
2181
0
4178
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
2182
0
4165
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
2183
0
4064
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
2184
0
4102
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
2185
0
4179
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
2186
0
4108
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
2187
0
4555
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [14]
2188
0
4030
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [15]
2189
0
4169
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [16]
2190
0
4073
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [17]
2191
0
4567
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [18]
2192
0
4551
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [19]
2193
0
4558
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [20]
2194
0
4573
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [21]
2195
0
4110
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [22]
2196
0
4103
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [23]
2197
0
4170
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [24]
2198
0
4171
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [25]
2199
0
4077
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [26]
2200
0
4163
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [27]
2201
0
4121
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [28]
2202
0
4073
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [29]
2203
0
4109
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [30]
2204
0
4119
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [31]
2205
0
4104
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [32]
2206
0
4115
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [33]
2207
0
4075
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
243961
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
243961
0
Brisbane South Palliative Care Collaborative
Query!
Address [1]
243961
0
PO Box 4069
Eight Mile Plains
Brisbane QLD 4113
Query!
Country [1]
243961
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name
Brisbane South Palliative Care Collaborative
Query!
Address
PO Box 4069
Eight Mile Plains
Brisbane QLD 4113
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251315
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
251315
0
Query!
Address [1]
251315
0
Query!
Country [1]
251315
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
244077
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
244077
0
Office of the Human Research Ethics Committee Ipswich Road Wooloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
244077
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
244077
0
04/08/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
244077
0
29/08/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
244077
0
HREC/09/QPAH/204
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
There is little evidence base to direct physicians as to when to use paracetamol for the management of pain in palliative patients who require opioids. In particular, it is not known whether the addition of eight large paracetamol tablets (4gm) to the daily medications of patients, using low-dose strong opioids, improves pain control or merely adds to patients’ tablet burden. This study is a double-blind randomised controlled trial, designed to investigate any analgesic benefits of paracetamol for patients using low-dose strong opioids. It requires patients to take either 4gm of paracetamol or placebo in addition to their usual daily opioids for five days and then to swap to placebo or 4gm of paracetamol for the next five days. Patients are asked to complete a daily diary throughout the ten day study period that records subjective and objective measures of pain control, aspects of common opioid side effects and quality of life. These records will be quantitatively analysed for statistical significance using paired t-test.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30455
0
Query!
Address
30455
0
Query!
Country
30455
0
Query!
Phone
30455
0
Query!
Fax
30455
0
Query!
Email
30455
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13702
0
Fiona Israel
Query!
Address
13702
0
17 McKechnie Drive
Eight Mile Plains Qld 4113
Query!
Country
13702
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
13702
0
+ 61 7 3169 9875
Query!
Fax
13702
0
+ 61 7 3169 9885
Query!
Email
13702
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4630
0
A/Prof Liz Reymond
Query!
Address
4630
0
17 McKechnie Drive
Eight Mile Plains Qld 4113
Query!
Country
4630
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
4630
0
+ 61 7 3169 9867
Query!
Fax
4630
0
+ 61 7 3169 9885
Query!
Email
4630
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF