Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609001071213
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/12/2009
Date registered
14/12/2009
Date last updated
11/07/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Case Series Investigating the efficacy of Rotation to Methadone in Palliative Patients with Cancer Related Pain
Query!
Scientific title
A Case Series Investigating change in self-rated pain following Rotation to Methadone in Palliative Patients with Cancer Related Pain
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Analgesic effectiveness of rotation to methadone for palliative patients experiencing pain with both nociceptive and neuropathic qualities and that has been inadequately controlled by escalating doses of other narcotics
252294
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
252474
252474
0
0
Query!
Other cancer types
Query!
Anaesthesiology
256570
256570
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
There are 3 phases to this case series intervention. During Phase 1 all patients will have their baseline narcotic increased by at least 30% with actual dose being determined by the treating physician. After 3-5 days if pain levels persist above 4 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with values ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (unbearable) or the patient reports unacceptable narcotic side-effects and the patient is in agreement they will be admitted to a specialist palliative care unit (if not already an inpatient). Phase 2 involves the patient having their current narcotic ceased and an equianalgesic dose of methadone(physeptone) commenced. Patients will be ordered appropriate breakthrough medications during this time. Patients will be monitored for emergent signs of central nervous system toxicity including respiratory depression while doses of methadone are titrated until the patient is stabilized with pain scores less than 4 on the NRS. Phase 3 involves the patient being discharged home and monitored for a further 4 days. If people are improved with rotation to methadone then they can keep taking it. Throughout the study period patients will be asked to keep a daily diary. The primary outcome variable is change in rated pain from pre to post methadone rotation. The secondary outcome variables include subjective ratings of nausea and vomiting, cognitive impairment (drowsiness and unclear thinking), constipation, mood and quality of life. These changes will be assessed in the same way as subjective pain.
Duration is approximately 2 to 3 weeks
Query!
Intervention code [1]
241612
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
uncontrolled
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
253351
0
Mean difference in pain as rated on an 11 point NRS over the study period and global impression of pain control.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
253351
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
253351
0
Participants will keep a daily diary commencing the day after the patient is consented and prior to rotation onto Physeptone until 4 days following discharge from the in-patient unit and will record all breakthrough/ rescue medications. To provide a more stable estimate of change in pain, an averaged rating over the last 3 days prior to admission will be compared to that of the last 3 days post-discharge and subsequent exit from the study.
Global impression of pain will be assessed on exit from the study
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
262433
0
Mean difference in nausea/vomiting ratings as rated on an 11 point NRS over the pre and post rotation period.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
262433
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
262433
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the study period. Mean nausea/vomiting ratings over the last 3 days prior to rotation onto Physeptone will be compared to that of the last 3 days post-discharge and subsequent exit from the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
262434
0
Mean difference in drowsiness ratings as rated on an 11 point NRS over the pre and post rotation period.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
262434
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
262434
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the study period. Mean drowsiness ratings over the last 3 days prior to rotation onto Physeptone will be compared to that of the last 3 days post-discharge and subsequent exit from the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
262435
0
Mean difference in cognitive impairement ratings as rated on an 11 point NRS over the pre and post rotation period.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
262435
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
262435
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the study period. Mean cognitive impairment ratings over the last 3 days prior to rotation onto Physeptone will be compared to that of the last 3 days post-discharge and subsequent exit from the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
262436
0
Mean difference in constipation ratings as rated on an 11 point NRS over the pre and post rotation period.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
262436
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
262436
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the study period. Mean constipation ratings over the last 3 days prior to rotation onto Physeptone will be compared to that of the last 3 days post-discharge and subsequent exit from the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
262437
0
Mean difference in quality of life as rated on an 11 point NRS over the pre and post rotation period.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
262437
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
262437
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the study period. Mean quality of life ratings over the last 3 days prior to rotation onto Physeptone will be compared to that of the last 3 days post-discharge and subsequent exit from the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
262438
0
Mean overall mood ratings as rated on an 11 point NRS over the pre and post rotation period.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
262438
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
262438
0
Participants will keep a daily diary for the study period. Mean overall mood ratings over the last 3 days prior to rotation onto Physeptone will be compared to that of the last 3 days post-discharge and subsequent exit from the study.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
*Patients reporting uncontrolled pain (defined as 4 or greater on a numerical rating scale 0-10 despite the use of regular background narcotics +/- adjuvants
*A component of the patients pain must be neoropathic as assessed using a validated neuropathic pain diagnostic assessment tool, the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 (DN4)
*Able to give informed consent in English
*Willing to be admitted to an inpatient facility for rotation to methadone
*Mini mental state exam (MMSE) score = or above 25/30
*Unsuitable for, or refusing, non-pharmacological interventions e.g. nerve blocks for pain
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
*Patients less than 18 years of age
*Patients in whom the use of methadone is contraindicated e.g. using Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOs), active alcoholism
*Patients with known risk factors for a prolonged QT interval
*Patients who have received treatments in the past 2 weeks likely to impact on pain levels e.g. chemotherapy, or who receive such therapy during the study period
*Changes in concomitant analgesic medication during the study period
*Any patient, in the opinion of the researchers, who is unable to comply with the study protocol
*Life expectancy less than 3 weeks
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
N/A
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
17/12/2009
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
20
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
2313
0
4355
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
2314
0
4113
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
2315
0
4350
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
2316
0
4114
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
2317
0
4129
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
2318
0
4131
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
2319
0
4178
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
2320
0
4165
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
2321
0
4064
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
2322
0
4102
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
2323
0
4179
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
2324
0
4108
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
2325
0
4555
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [14]
2326
0
4030
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [15]
2327
0
4169
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [16]
2328
0
4073
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [17]
2329
0
4567
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [18]
2330
0
4551
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [19]
2331
0
4558
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [20]
2332
0
4573
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [21]
2333
0
4110
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [22]
2334
0
4103
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [23]
2335
0
4170
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [24]
2336
0
4171
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [25]
2337
0
4077
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [26]
2338
0
4163
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [27]
2339
0
4121
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [28]
2340
0
4073
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [29]
2341
0
4109
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [30]
2342
0
4119
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [31]
2343
0
4104
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [32]
2344
0
4115
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
256093
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
256093
0
Brisbane South Palliative Care Collaborative
Query!
Address [1]
256093
0
PO Box 4069 Eight Mile Plains Brisbane QLD 4113
Query!
Country [1]
256093
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name
Brisbane South Palliative Care Collaborative
Query!
Address
PO Box 4069 Eight Mile Plains Brisbane QLD 4113
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251435
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
251435
0
Query!
Address [1]
251435
0
Query!
Country [1]
251435
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
258182
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
258182
0
Office of the Human Research Ethics Committee ipswich Road Wooloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
258182
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
258182
0
01/09/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
258182
0
18/11/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
258182
0
HREC/09/QPAH/227
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This project has been designed to investigate the efficacy of rotation to methadone for pain control in people with cancer whose pain is uncontrolled despite substantial increases in the dose of their prescribed narcotic. By uncontrolled we mean that the person has rated their pain as being equal to or above 4 on an 11 point pain rating scale that ranges from 0 (equivalent to no pain at all), to 10 (equivalent to unbearable pain). To be eligible for this study, a person’s pain must have been clinically assessed to have two different components. One component relates to the type of pain that results when injured body tissues cause pain receptors to fire (known as nociceptive pain) and the other component relates to the type of pain that results when nervous tissues is damaged (known as neuropathic pain). People who meet these conditions will be rotated to a dose of methadone that is equivalent to their previous narcotic does in terms of analgesic potential. They will be required to maintain a daily diary about their pain levels, possible narcotic side effects (such as constipation), quality of life and mood. Diary entries before rotation to methadone will be compared statistically to diary entries after rotation to methadone. If people are improved with rotation to methadone then they can keep taking it.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30554
0
Query!
Address
30554
0
Query!
Country
30554
0
Query!
Phone
30554
0
Query!
Fax
30554
0
Query!
Email
30554
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13801
0
Fiona Israel
Query!
Address
13801
0
PO Box 4069
Eight Mile Plains QLD 4113
Query!
Country
13801
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
13801
0
+61 7 3169 9875
Query!
Fax
13801
0
+61 7 3169 9885
Query!
Email
13801
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4729
0
A/Prof Liz Reymond
Query!
Address
4729
0
PO Box 4069
Eight Mile Plains QLD 4113
Query!
Country
4729
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
4729
0
+61 7 3169 9867
Query!
Fax
4729
0
+61 7 3169 9885
Query!
Email
4729
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF