Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609001035213
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/11/2009
Date registered
4/12/2009
Date last updated
17/10/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Improving communication about treatment options for asymptomatic ovarian cancer patients with rising cancer antigen 125 (CA-125): A randomised controlled trial of a Decision Aid
Query!
Scientific title
In women with asymptomatic ovarian cancer and rising cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels, does the use of a Decision Aid increase satisfaction and reduce difficulties with decision-making when compared to a general information booklet? A randomised controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287852
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
CA-125 DA
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Communication about treatment options and decision making for women with asymptomatic ovarian cancer and rising CA-125 levels.
252295
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
252475
252475
0
0
Query!
Ovarian and primary peritoneal
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Women with asymptomatic ovarian cancer and rising CA-125 levels will be randomised to receive either a Decision Aid (intervention group) or a Cancer Council NSW booklet called Understanding Ovarian Cancer (control group). The Decision Aid is a booklet containing clear written and graphical information about each of the main treatment options, as well as exercises to help with the process of weighing up the pros and cons of these options. Participation in the study involves filling out two questionnaires over a 4 month period. The study is expected to conclude in 2012.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
241611
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Women in the control group will receive a Cancer Council NSW booklet called Understanding Ovarian Cancer, which contains general information about ovarian cancer.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
253350
0
The primary outcome measure for this study will be satisfaction and difficulties with decision-making, assessed using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
253350
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
253350
0
This will be assessed in a questionnaire that the women complete after they have both read the booklet and made a treatment decision. There is no specific time frame in which this must occur.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
262426
0
Information and Involvement Preferences will be assessed using an adapted form of the Cassileth Information Styles Questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
262426
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
262426
0
This will be assessed in a questionnaire that the women complete after they have both read the booklet and made a treatment decision. There is no specific time frame in which this must occur.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
262427
0
Anxiety levels will be assessed using a 6-item short-form of the state scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
262427
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
262427
0
This will be assessed in a questionnaire that the women complete after they have both read the booklet and made a treatment decision. There is no specific time frame in which this must occur.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
262428
0
Knowledge scale: Understanding the costs and benefits of the treatment options will be assessed using a scale developed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
262428
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
262428
0
This will be assessed in a questionnaire that the women complete after they have both read the booklet and made a treatment decision. There is no specific time frame in which this must occur.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
262429
0
Feedback on the Decision Aid (for those in the intervention group)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
262429
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
262429
0
This will be assessed in a questionnaire that the women complete after they have both read the booklet and made a treatment decision. There is no specific time frame in which this must occur.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
262430
0
Patient treatment preferences, assessed through a preference scale question for each option, with endpoints "do not prefer this option" and "strongly prefer this option".
Query!
Assessment method [5]
262430
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
262430
0
This will be assessed in a questionnaire that the women complete after they have both read the booklet and made a treatment decision. There is no specific time frame in which this must occur.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
262431
0
Quality of life: Patients will be asked to rate their overall quality of life using the single-item Spitzer Uniscale.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
262431
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
262431
0
This will be assessed in a questionnaire that the women complete after they have both read the booklet and made a treatment decision. There is no specific time frame in which this must occur. It will be reassessed in a follow up questionnaire 4 months later.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
262432
0
Decisional regret and satisfaction will be measured with the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) and the Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Scale respectively.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
262432
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
262432
0
This will be assessed in a follow up questionnaire 4 months after women have read the booklet and made a treatment decision.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Women with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, who have undergone tumour debulking / cyto-reductive surgery, have completed first-line chemotherapy, and are currently asymptomatic during follow-up with rising CA-125 levels.
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Women who do not understand sufficient English to read the booklet and complete the questionnaires, have a concurrent psychiatric disorder or are cognitively impaired are not eligible for the study.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Randomised block design
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Data collected is being analysed
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Participant recruitment difficulties
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
10/12/2008
Query!
Actual
28/09/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/10/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
22/11/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
178
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
71
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC,ACT,QLD,SA,WA,NT,TAS
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
256091
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
256091
0
Cancer Institute NSW
Query!
Address [1]
256091
0
Australian Technology Park
Biomedical Building
Suite 101
1 Central Avenue
Eveleigh NSW 2015
Query!
Country [1]
256091
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making
Query!
Address
School of Psychology
Brennan MacCallum Building (A18)
University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251434
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
251434
0
Sydney Gynaecologic Oncology Group
Query!
Address [1]
251434
0
Sydney Cancer Centre
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Missenden Road
Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country [1]
251434
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
258181
0
Syndey South West Area Health Service (RPAH Zone)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
258181
0
Research Development Office Level 3, Building 92 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
258181
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
258181
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
258181
0
10/12/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
258181
0
HREC/08/RPAH/531
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a decision aid (DA) for women with asymptomatic ovarian cancer and rising CA-125 levels after successful first-line treatment. Participants will be randomised to receive either the DA or a control booklet called "Understanding Ovarian Cancer”. All participants will complete an initial questionnaire when they first make their treatment decision, and a follow-up questionnaire 4 months later. It is anticipated that the DA will improve understanding of the treatment options, reduce decisional conflict, increase satisfaction with decision-making, and not increase anxiety, compared to the control booklet.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Anderson, C., Carter, J., Nattress, K., Beale, P., Philp, S., Harrison, J., Juraskova, I. (2011). "The Booklet Helped Me Not to Panic" A Pilot of a Decision Aid for Asymptomatic Women With Ovarian Cancer and With Rising CA-125 Levels. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 21(4), 737-743. I Juraskova, A Fisher, H Gray, C Bonner, G Heruc, C Anderson, K Nattress, G Gard, J Carter, S Paramasivam. Making difficult decisions about further treatment in ovarian cancer: the development and evaluation of two decision aids. The 30th Scientific Meeting of the Australian Society of Gynaecologic Oncologists (ASGO), Penang, Malaysia, July, 2015 (Poster) I Juraskova, C Bonner, G Heruc, C Anderson, K Nattress, & J Carter. To treat or not to treat: A new RCT helping asymptomatic ovarian cancer patients with rising CA-125 levels to understand and choose their preferred treatment option. The 35th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Clinical Oncological Society of Australia (COSA), Gold Coast, November 2009 (Poster)
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30555
0
A/Prof Ilona Juraskova
Query!
Address
30555
0
The Lifehouse, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39Z)
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006 Australia
Query!
Country
30555
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
30555
0
+61 2 9036 5275
Query!
Fax
30555
0
Query!
Email
30555
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13802
0
Dr Ilona Juraskova
Query!
Address
13802
0
The Lifehouse, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39Z)
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006 Australia
Query!
Country
13802
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
13802
0
+61 2 9036 5275
Query!
Fax
13802
0
+61 2 9036 5292
Query!
Email
13802
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4730
0
Dr Ilona Juraskova
Query!
Address
4730
0
The Lifehouse, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39Z)
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006 Australia
Query!
Country
4730
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
4730
0
+61 2 9036 5275
Query!
Fax
4730
0
+61 2 9036 5292
Query!
Email
4730
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF