Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000126011
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/01/2010
Date registered
8/02/2010
Date last updated
8/02/2010
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of N-Alpha Methyl Histamine versus Propranolol in prevention of miigraine.
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy of N alpha Methyl histamine versus propranolol in migraine prophylaxis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
1361
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1113-4606
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
migraine prophylaxis
256664
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
256824
256824
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
a) Name of the treatment: N alpha methyl histamine in Evan’s solution (phenol 0.4%, isotonic sodium chloride) (10 ug/ml)
b) Dose administered 0.1 ml
c) Frequency and duration administered: twice a week for 12 weeks
d) Mode of administration: subcutaneous injection into back region of the upper arm.
The number of treatment/control arms in this trial.
Arm 1: N alpha methyl histamine + placebo propanolol
Arm 2: placebo N alpha methyl histamine + propanolol
Query!
Intervention code [1]
255899
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients randomized to receive oral propanolol will be given 40 mg/day for one week; then the dose will be increased 40 mg/week until a total daily dose of 120 mg/day which will be sustained for a period of twelve weeks. These patients will also receive subcutaneous placebo (Evan’s solution in back region of the upper arm) twice a week for a period of twelve weeks, administered in the same escalated-dose as N alpha methyl histamine.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
257694
0
Significant decrease (with respect to basal values) in the magnitude of all parameters studied: assessed every month after randomisation (for 3 months).
1) Reduction in to rescue medication.
"Significant decrease" is a 20% reduction in the number of tablets ingested per month. This information will be recorded by the patient in the patient's diary.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
257694
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
257694
0
Recorded weekly for twelve weeks after randomisation.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
257695
0
Significant decrease (with respect to basal values) in the magnitude of
all parameters studied: assessed every month after randomisation (for 3 months)
2) Reduction in headache intensity (1-2-3). Recorded in the patient's diary.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
257695
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
257695
0
Recorded weekly for twelve weeks after randomisation.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
257781
0
Significant decrease (with respect to basal values) in the magnitude of
all parameters studied: assessed every month after randomisation (for 3 months)
3) Frequency of headache per month. Recorded by the patient in the patient's diary. Significant decrease is a 20% reduction in the number of attacks per month.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
257781
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
257781
0
Recorded weekly for twelve weeks after randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
263182
0
Significant decrease (with respect to basal values) in the magnitude of all parameters studied: assessed every month after randomisation (for 3 months).
1) Duration of migraine attacks.
Recorded by the patient in the patient's diary. Significant decrease is a 20% reduction in the amount of hours each episode lasts. Measured in hours.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
263182
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
263182
0
Recorded weekly for twelve weeks after randomisation.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria.—The study will include outpatient male and female patients of any race between the ages of 18 and 65 years who have been diagnosed with migraine not attributable to another cause; with or without aura occurring for at least 15 consecutive days in a month, for 3 months in the absence of medication overuse. Migraine must have at least 2 of the following characteristics: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate or severe pain intensity, and/or aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity (eg, walking or climbing stairs). With the following occurring during the attack: nausea and/or vomiting or photophobia and/or phonophobia.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria.—The following criteria are grounds for exclusion: female patients who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test) or planning to become pregnant during the study period, are breast feeding, or are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control; patients with evidence of underlying conditions judged to preclude treatment with either test medication; patients who have previously used study medications for any reason; patients unable to discontinue any prohibited medication(s) including carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (eg, acetazolamide, dichlorphenamide), digoxin, metformin, central nervous system depressants (including alcohol), nonstudy anticonvulsant or antiepileptic medications, agents that might interfere with neuromuscular function (eg, aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare-like agents), or hormonal contraceptives; patients with evidence of recent alcohol/drug abuse or acute medication overuse; patients with diabetes mellitus, liver or kidney disease, recent (within 3 months) sepsis or vascular surgery, history of clinically significant pulmonary disease (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma) active within the previous 12 months, history of heart attack or stroke, cardiac disorder (eg, any clinically significant dysrhythmia), aortic aneurysm, as well as patients at intermediate or higher risk for cardiac disease defined as having 2 or more major risk factors (cigarette smoking, hypotension).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Selected patients will undergo a one-month period of prophylactic agent washout, during which headache frequency will be monitored.
The method of allocation concealment was the use of sealed opaque envelopes.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation by using a randomisation table from a statistic book
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/03/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2435
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [1]
2435
0
Colima
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
256410
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
256410
0
Query!
Address [1]
256410
0
Query!
Country [1]
256410
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Hospital General deZona 1 Intituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Query!
Address
Av. de los Maestros 149
Centro CP 28000
Colima, Colima
Query!
Country
Mexico
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251715
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
251715
0
Query!
Address [1]
251715
0
Query!
Country [1]
251715
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
1083
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
1083
0
Saul Barreto Vizcaino
Query!
Address [1]
1083
0
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Hospital General deZona1
Av. de los Maestros 149
Centro CP 28000
Colima, Colima
Query!
Country [1]
1083
0
Mexico
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
258455
0
Comite de Etica del Hospital General de Zona 1 IMSS
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
258455
0
Hospital General de Zona 1 IMSS No R-2007-601-9 Av. de los Maestros 149 Centro CP28000 Colima, Colima
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
258455
0
Mexico
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
258455
0
01/05/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
258455
0
20/05/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
258455
0
No R-2007-601-9
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
N alpha methyl histamine, possesses a greater affinity for H3 receptors, and could constitute a new therapeutic drug in migraine prophylaxis. OBJETIVE. To compare the superior efficacy of the subcutaneous administration of N alpha-methyl histamine versus oral propranolol in migraine prophylaxis, undertaking double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Hypothesis That subcutaneously injected N alpha methyl histamine (1-3ug) is more effective than propranolol (120mg/ day) in migraine prophylaxis. Null Hypothesis There is no difference between the subcutaneous administration of N- alpha methyl histamine in doses of 1-3 ng and oral propanolol as prophylactic agents against migraine METHODS. A randomized, double–blind study in 60 patients with migraine, male or female adults between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Selected patients will undergo a one-month period of prophylactic agent washout, they will then be divided into two groups for treatment in randomized blocks of three, double-blind fashion: N-alpha metyl histamine study group (n=30) and the propranolol control group (n=30). The treatment will consist of subcutaneous (back region of the upper arm) administration of N alpha methyl histamine twice a week, plus an oral placebo for a period of twelve weeks. Therapy with propranolol will begin at 40 mg/day for one week; until a total daily dose of 120 mg/day for a period of twelve weeks; plus a subcutaneous placebo. The variables we will study are: headache frequency; intensity of pain; duration of pain; intake of rescue analgesics and MIDAS. Statistical Analysis: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population will include all randomized patients. Two-tailed Student’s t test. Mann-Whitney U rank sum test. In order to analyze the temporal course of each treatment, a Friedman repeated measures ANOVA on ranks test will be used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences between basal values and values found for the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks of treatment. This study has been approved by the Ethical and Scientific Committee of our hospital.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
1.Millan-Guerrero RO, Isais CM, Antonio OA, Pacheco-Carrasco MF. Histamine as a therapeutic alternative in migraine prophylaxis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Headache 1999;39:576-580 2.Millan-Guerrero RO, Pineda-Lucatero AG. Trujillo-Hernandez B, Tene CE, Pacheco MF. Na-Methyl histamine safety and efficacy in migraine prophylaxis: Phase I and Phase II study. Headache 2003;43:389-94 3.Millan-Guerrero RO, Isais- Millan R, Trujillo Hernandez B, Tene PC. . Na-Methyl Histamine safety and efficacy in migraine prophylaxis: Phase III study. Can J Neurol Sci 2006;33:195-199 4.Millan-Guerrero RO, Trujillo Hernandez B, Tene PC. Histamina subcutanea en profilaxis de migrana. Efectos iniciales y seguimiento a largo plazo. Neurologia 2006; 21:55-59 5.Millan-Guerrero RO, Isais-Millan R, Barreto-Vizcaino S, Rivera-Castano L, Garcia-SA, Lopez BC, Membrila MM, Munoz SR. Subcutaneous histamine versus sodium valproate in migraine prophylaxis: A Randomized, Controlled, double-blind study. Eur J. Neurol.2007;14:1079-1084 6.Millan-Guerrero RO, Isais-Millan S, Barreto-Vizcaino S, Rivera-Castano L, Rios-Madariaga C. Subcutaneous histamine versus botulinum toxin type A in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, double-blind study. Eur J. Neurol 2009, 16: 88–94
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30761
0
Query!
Address
30761
0
Query!
Country
30761
0
Query!
Phone
30761
0
Query!
Fax
30761
0
Query!
Email
30761
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14008
0
Dr. Rebeca Olivia Millan Guerrero
Query!
Address
14008
0
Hospital General de Zona 1 IMSS
Avenida de los Maestros 149
Colonia Centro
CP 28000
Colima, Colima
Query!
Country
14008
0
Mexico
Query!
Phone
14008
0
01 52 31 23 14 17 57
Query!
Fax
14008
0
01 52 31 23 14 17 57
Query!
Email
14008
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4936
0
Dr. Rebeca Olivia Millan Guerrero
Query!
Address
4936
0
Hospital General de Zona 1 IMSS
Avenida de los Maestros 149
Colonia Centro
CP 28000
Colima, Colima
Query!
Country
4936
0
Mexico
Query!
Phone
4936
0
0152 31 23 14 17 57
Query!
Fax
4936
0
01 52 31 23 14 17 57
Query!
Email
4936
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF