Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000838011
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
28/09/2010
Date registered
6/10/2010
Date last updated
6/10/2010
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Concord Falls and Bone Service Study: An evaluation of the effectiveness of a specialist service on reducing falls in community dwelling older people who have fallen.
Query!
Scientific title
In community-dwelling older people who have fallen, does the provision of falls prevention interventions and osteoporosis treatment through a specialist Falls and Bone service prevent more falls than care coordinated by General Practitioners.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
252391
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1116-7103
Query!
Trial acronym
CONFABS study (Concord Falls and Bone Service)
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Accidental falls in the elderly
257902
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents
258064
258064
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Musculoskeletal
258217
258217
0
0
Query!
Osteoporosis
Query!
Public Health
258486
258486
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Specialist Falls and Bone service - coordinating targeted multifactorial falls prevention interventions and adequate assessment and treatment of osteoporosis. The falls prevention interventions are not the intervention of interest rather the service model to provide them.
The specialist service consists of a registered nurse who performs the baseline assessments. A geriatrician assesses participants in a hospital based clinic setting or domicilary visit. The first clinic visit lasts 90 minutes and includes a comprehensive geriatric medical assessment with focused clinical examination including gait and balance assessment with Timed Up and Go Test, Sit to Stand Times Five and Static Balance Assessment. Investigations performed at this clinic and ordered by the Geriatrician include blood tests to assess osteoporosis risk, Bone Mineral Denistometry (BMD), Computerised Tomography (CT) of the brain, x-rays of the thoraco-lumbo-sacral spine and 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The participant is seen again at 6 weeks, 4 months and 12 months after the initial assessment and seen initially within 2 weeks of randomization (aiming for 1 week). These subsequent visits will again be with a Geriatrician. At the week 6 visit the participant will have the results of the relevant investigations reviewed and treatment instituted, such as osteoporosis treatment according to national treatment guidelines including Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation. Falls prevention interventions will be coordinated and arranged by the Geriatrician with the assistance of community based physiotherapists, occupational therapists and podiatrists not employed by the research team per se. Telephone and postal communication with participants and their General Practitioner will be used to communicate changes in treatment. At the 4 month and 12 month visits the Geriatrician will review the falls prevention interventions employed and coordinate additional interventions depending on the outcome of these interventions. For example, should a participant wish to continue an exercise programme following the completion of a programme, community based classes will be sourced or the participant will be referred to a more complex class such as Tai Chi, if they were unable to participate in this previously. In addition, compliance with medication changes will be reviewed and additional changes made as necessary.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
256953
0
Prevention
Query!
Intervention code [2]
257314
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [3]
257315
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
General Practice (GP) coordinated use of targeted multifactorial falls prevention interventions. Enhanced GP service model with falls risk assessment and generic advice provided by the research team for coordination by the GP. The GP is the usual practitioner caring for the participant. There will be no specific GP education, but there exists ongoing education sessions given by the Principal Investigator to the local GP network as part of continuing medical education.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
258924
0
Number of falls (rate of falls)
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
258924
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
258924
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
258925
0
Number of fallers
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
258925
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
258925
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
265096
0
Number of injurious falls (injurious fall rate) intervention versus control
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls. Details on the injuries sustained are obtained from follow-up phone calls and data linkage including hospital admissions, Emergency Department attendances and any investigations performed. Injurious falls will be defined as minor or major depending on the injury sustained and the treatment required by the research team in accordance with previously published definitions. For example lacerations or abrasions which do not require sutures or repeated dressings by community nurses would be termed a minor injury.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
265096
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
265096
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
265367
0
All cause mortality (mortality rate) intervention versus control.
Using telephone follow-up phone calls and data linkage to New South Wales (NSW) Register of Births Deaths and Marriages and / or the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Death Index for deaths outside NSW.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
265367
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
265367
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
265368
0
Number of fractures (fracture rate) intervention versus control
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls and data linkage to medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
265368
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
265368
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
265574
0
Admission rate to residential aged care facilities intervention versus control.
Using telephone follow-up phone calls and data linkage to medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
265574
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
265574
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
265575
0
Time to first fall intervention versus control
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
265575
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
265575
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
265576
0
Time to first injurious fall intervention versus control.
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls and data linkage to medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
265576
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
265576
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
265577
0
Emergency Department attendance rate intervention versus control.
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls and data linkage to medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
265577
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
265577
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
265578
0
Acute hospital admission rate intervention versus control.
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls and data linkage to medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
265578
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
265578
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
265749
0
Effect of intervention on rate of falls in subgroups of single fallers and recurrent fallers.
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
265749
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
265749
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
265750
0
Effect of intervention on rate of falls in subgroups of subjects 65 - 79 years and subjects 80 years and over.
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
265750
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
265750
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
265751
0
Effect of interventionon rate of falls in those with mild cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) 20-24) and cognitively intact (MMSE 25 and above).
Using monthly falls calendar to record falls and telephone follow-up phone calls.
Query!
Assessment method [11]
265751
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
265751
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
265752
0
Change in quality of life in intervention group versus control group.
Change in score of Short Form 12 (SF-12) Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
265752
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
265752
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
265753
0
Change in Physical Activity Score of the Elderly (PASE) in intervention group versus control group.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
265753
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
265753
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
265754
0
Qualitative assessment of bisphosphonate tolerability in the intervention group.
Gastrointestinal Experience Survey of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Survey at 4, 8 and 12 months.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
265754
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
265754
0
4, 8 and 12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
265755
0
Difference in bisphosphonate use in intervention group versus control group.
Telephone follow-up phone call asking about bisphosphonate use with baselines research nurse assessment identifying medication use initially.
Query!
Assessment method [15]
265755
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
265755
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
265756
0
Qualitative assessment of appropriateness and compliance with exercise interventions in both groups.
Questionnaire on completion of exercise intervention. This questionnaire has been developed for use in a clinical trial coordinated by a peer group of researchers but has not been validated to date.
Query!
Assessment method [16]
265756
0
Query!
Timepoint [16]
265756
0
12 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
265757
0
Prevalence of postural hypotension on 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the intervention group
Query!
Assessment method [17]
265757
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
265757
0
At 6 weeks following randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
265758
0
Prevalence of subcortical ischaemic changes on computerised tomography (CT) of the brain
Query!
Assessment method [18]
265758
0
Query!
Timepoint [18]
265758
0
At 6 weeks following randomisation
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. One or more fall in the preceding 12 months
2. Community dwelling (house, flat, retirement village, hostel)
3. Independently mobile with or without walking aids
4. Resident within the study area for the following 12 months
Query!
Minimum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Cognitive impairment MMSE <20/30
2. Terminal illness with life expectancy less than 12 months
3. Parkinson’s Disease or other neurodegenerative conditions
4. Unable to understand participant information or consent in English
5. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the preceding 12 months
6. Has not attended a General Practitioner in the preceding 12 months
7. No usual General Practitioner
8. Living outside the study area
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Potentially eligible subjects are recruited from Emergency Department and the community through referrals from health care professionals, or self referrals.
Allocation concealment was achieved by contacting the holder of the allocation schedule at central administration.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Stratified permuted block randomisation using a computer program.
The strata used were:
1. age - 65-79 years and 80 years and older.
2. Fall history - one fall in the prior 12 months and 2 or more falls in the prior 12 months.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
13/09/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
400
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257640
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
257640
0
Ageing and Alzheimer's Research Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
257640
0
Building 18,
Concord Repatriation General Hospital,
Hospital Road
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country [1]
257640
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name
Centre for Education and Research on Ageing
Query!
Address
Building 18
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Hospital Road
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256863
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
256863
0
University of Sydney
Query!
Address [1]
256863
0
Research Office
Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building
City Road - Darlington Campus
The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Country [1]
256863
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
259741
0
Sydney South West Area Health Service - Human Research and Ethics Committee - Concord Repatriation General Hospital (CRGH)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
259741
0
Building 75 Concord Repatriation General Hospital Hospital Road Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
259741
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
259741
0
16/02/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
259741
0
02/06/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
259741
0
HREC/10/CRGH/30 CH62/6/2010-024
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Falls are a common occurrence in older people and can have adverse affects on health and independence. It is unclear how best to provide interventions to prevent falls. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a hospital based specialist led falls and bone service at reducing the number of falls and number of fallers in a group of community living older people. Our hypothesis is that a hospital based specialist service is more effective at assessing fall and osteoporosis risk and coordinating interventions to prevent falls and treat osteoporosis than enhanced General Practice care.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
31485
0
Query!
Address
31485
0
Query!
Country
31485
0
Query!
Phone
31485
0
Query!
Fax
31485
0
Query!
Email
31485
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14732
0
Dr Nichola Boyle
Query!
Address
14732
0
Centre for Education and Research on Ageing
Building 18
Concord Hospital
Hospital Road
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country
14732
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
14732
0
+61 2 9767 8356
Query!
Fax
14732
0
+61 2 9767 5419
Query!
Email
14732
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5660
0
Dr Nichola Boyle
Query!
Address
5660
0
Centre for Education and Research on Ageing
Building 18
Concord Hospital
Hospital Road
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country
5660
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
5660
0
+61 2 9767 8356
Query!
Fax
5660
0
+61 2 9767 5419
Query!
Email
5660
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF