Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000773033
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
14/09/2010
Date registered
16/09/2010
Date last updated
15/02/2011
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Prescription Procedures for Cochlear Hybrid Devices in Hearing Loss.
Query!
Scientific title
Prescription Procedures for Cochlear Hybrid Devices to optimise the acoustic-to electric output requirements for adults who use a Hybrid device.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
252578
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hearing loss
258065
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Ear
258226
258226
0
0
Query!
Deafness
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Many people with severe to profound, high-frequency hearing losses obtain limited benefit from hearing aids, but are not candidates for cochlear implants. Fitting an Electric Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) device, also known as a Hybrid device, may be a useful treatment option because these devices combine a hearing aid and a cochlear implant in the same ear. They allow low-frequency information to be delivered via the hearing aid part, and high-frequency information be delivered via the cochlear implant part. As this technology becomes commercially available and the number of recipients increases, an understanding of how to best apply it is crucial.
Adults who use a Cochlear Hybrid System will be fitted with new hearing aids using standard clinical procedures. These devices will be optimised according to the individual's needs. The performance of these optimised devices will be compared with proprietary device settings using a range of tests including: speech perception, music perception, localisation and functional performance in real life. The overall duration in which the hearing aids will be worn will be six months. The findings will be used as the basis to develop a prescription for devices that combine electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
257097
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention code [2]
257098
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This study will use a repeated-measures, single-subject design. Each subject serves as his/her own control, thereby accommodating the heterogeneity that characterizes hearing-impaired populations. Such designs are widely used in the study of cochlear implants.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
259085
0
Relative acoustic-to-electric output requirements for adults who use a Hybrid device.
Outcome assessments: Adults' performance with the optimised devices will be compared with their performance with the proprietary device settings using a range of tests including: speech perception, music perception and localisation testing. In addition, adults will be asked to complete questionnaires in regards to how well the devices perform in real life.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
259085
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
259085
0
These evaluations will be made at baseline and at 12 weeks after the fitting and optimisation of the hearing aids.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
259086
0
Acoustic-to-electric frequency boundary requirements by adults who use a Hybrid device.
Outcome assessments: Adults' performance with three different frequency boundary programs in their Hybrid sound processor will be evaluated using a range of tests including: speech perception, music perception, localisation testing and functional performance in real life questionnaires.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
259086
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
259086
0
These evaluations will be made at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks after randomisations of frequency boundary allocation programs.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
265377
0
Basis for deriving a theoretical prescription procedure for the fitting of devices that combine electric and acoustic stimulation.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
265377
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
265377
0
At completion of study the acoustic-to-electric frequency boundary allocation and output levels findings will be analysed and used as the basis to develop a prescription for fitting devices that combine electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Will be eighteen years of age or older at the time of evaluation.
2. Will be users of a Cochlear Hybrid System with a minimum of 12 months experience prior to enrolment.
3. The audiometric criteria for residual hearing in the implanted ear will be within the range of normal to profound.
4. A willingness to wear all device conditions (New hearing aids and Hybrid sound processor) on a daily basis for the duration of the study.
5. A willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol including a willingness to complete all tests and questionnaires.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Children under the age of 18 years of age.
2. People whose primary language is other than English (LOTEs).
3. Additional needs or disability that would prevent participation in evaluations.
4. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the participant, regarding the possible benefits and limitations of the study.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2011
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
16
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
3157
0
2067
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
3158
0
3010
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
3159
0
1675
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
3216
0
2067
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257548
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
257548
0
The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre Limited
Query!
Address [1]
257548
0
550 Swanson Street
Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences
The University of Melbourne VICTORIA 3010
Query!
Country [1]
257548
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name
The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre Limited
Query!
Address
550 Swanson Street
Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences
The University of Melbourne VICTORIA 3010
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256769
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
256769
0
National Acoustic Laboratories
Query!
Address [1]
256769
0
126 Greville Street
Chatswood NSW 2067
Query!
Country [1]
256769
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
259573
0
Australian Hearing Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00109)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
259573
0
126 Greville Street Chatswood NSW 2067
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
259573
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
259573
0
15/07/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
259573
0
03/09/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
259573
0
Approval Number AHHREC2010-4
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Many people with severe to profound, high-frequency sensorineural (permanent) hearing losses obtain minimal benefit from hearing aids, but do not meet the criteria for standard cochlear implantation. An Electric Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) device, also known as a Hybrid device, combines acoustic amplification in the low frequencies where hearing can be effectively aided, with electric stimulation in the high frequencies where hearing loss is profound, all within one implantable system. Fitting an Electric Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) device may be an effective treatment option for people with severe to profound high frequency hearing losses. As this technology becomes commercially available and the number of recipients increases, an understanding of how to best fit and combine the acoustic and electric stimulation to maximise outcomes for recipients is crucial. Although a significant amount of EAS research has been conducted over the last 10 years, the main focus of reported work has been on the post-operative hearing preservation outcomes and perceptual benefits of this intervention. To date the approach to fitting these devices has been highly variable and no systematic attempts have been made to optimise the fitting for maximising outcomes for recipients. The main aims of the proposed study are: 1. To optimise EAS devices as implemented in the Cochlear Hybrid System, which consists of a Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant and a Hybrid sound processor. 2.To evaluate the effect of systematic variations of acoustic to electrical stimulation on speech perception, music perception, localisation and functional performance in real life. The findings will be used as the basis to develop a prescription for devices that combine electric and acoustic stimulation.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
31577
0
Query!
Address
31577
0
Query!
Country
31577
0
Query!
Phone
31577
0
Query!
Fax
31577
0
Query!
Email
31577
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14824
0
Paola Incerti
Query!
Address
14824
0
Senior Research Audiologist
National Acoustic Laboratories
126 Greville Street
Chatswood NSW 2067.
Query!
Country
14824
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
14824
0
+61 2 9412 6963
Query!
Fax
14824
0
+61 2 9411 8273
Query!
Email
14824
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5752
0
Paola Incerti
Query!
Address
5752
0
Senior Research Audiologist
National Acoustic Laboratories
126 Greville Street
Chatswood NSW 2067.
Query!
Country
5752
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
5752
0
+61 2 9412 6963
Query!
Fax
5752
0
+61 2 9411 8273
Query!
Email
5752
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF