Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01473589
Registration number
NCT01473589
Ethics application status
Date submitted
14/11/2011
Date registered
17/11/2011
Date last updated
16/04/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
Effect of Teriparatide on Hip Fracture Healing
Query!
Scientific title
Effect of Teriparatide on Femoral Neck Fracture Healing
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
B3D-MC-GHDN
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
13467
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Femur Neck Fracture
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents
0
0
0
0
Query!
Fractures
Query!
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Teriparatide
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Treatment: Other - Calcium supplementation
Treatment: Other - Vitamin D supplementation
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Administered once daily by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 6 months
Experimental: Teriparatide - 20 microgram (µg) administered once daily by SC injection for 6 months
Treatment: Drugs: Teriparatide
Administered by SC injection
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Administered by SC injection
Treatment: Other: Calcium supplementation
Administered orally
Treatment: Other: Vitamin D supplementation
Administered orally
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With No Revision Surgery at 12 Months After Internal Fixation of a Low-Trauma Femoral Neck Fracture
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Revision surgery (re-operation) was defined as any additional surgical intervention performed or recommended at the site of the index procedure, except those that were planned at the time of the index procedure.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Radiographic Evidence of Healing
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The signs of femoral neck fracture healing included disappearance of the fracture line on radiographs. If a participant had radiographic evidence of healing at the 12-month visit, that participant was considered to have radiographic evidence of healing.
Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with radiographic evidence of healing / total number of participants analyzed) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Randomization up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Pain Control During Ambulation
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The worst pain numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. NRS Item 3 assessed the worst musculoskeletal pain severity during the walking test. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. The following cut-points were used to categorize the NRS responses: 0 = no pain, 1 to 4 = mild pain, 5 to 6 = moderate pain, and 7 to 10 = severe pain. Participants with an NRS score of \<7 were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain with ambulation and no worsening of NRS scores \>2 from baseline. Percentage was calculated as: (Number of participants with pain control during ambulation / total number of participants) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During 24 Hours Prior to Visit
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Fracture-site pain severity was assessed for pain in the 24 hours preceding a visit. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. Participants with an NRS score of \<7 in the 24 hours preceding a visit and no worsening of NRS \>2 from baseline were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with pain control during 24 hours preceding a visit / total number of participants) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During Weight Bearing
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Fracture-site pain severity was assessed for pain on weight bearing. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. Participants with an NRS score of \<7 during weight bearing and no worsening of NRS \>2 from baseline were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with pain control during weight bearing / total number of participants) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Functional Evidence of Healing
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Functional healing was defined as ability to walk with a gait speed = 0.05 meters/second (m/s) with a change from baseline = -0.1 m/s. The walking test involved having the participant walk a distance of 7 meters (m) at a self-selected, comfortable pace. A 4-m portion of the test was timed to determine the participant's gait speed in m/s.
Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with functional evidence of healing / total number of participants analyzed) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
12 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Able to Ambulate
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Ability to ambulate was defined as ambulatory with convalescent aid or without convalescent aid. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants able to ambulate / number of total participants analyzed) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Regain Their Prefracture Ambulatory Status
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Prefracture ambulatory status was defined as either ambulatory with or without a walking aid. A participant was considered to have regained their prefracture ambulatory status if the participant's postsurgery ambulatory status was returned to or was improved from their pre-surgery ambulatory status. Percentage was calculated as = (number of participants who regained their ambulatory status / total number analyzed) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Worst Fracture-Site Pain
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Participants with an NRS score of \<7 were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Least Squares (LS) means was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, and fixation type.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, 6 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Gait Speed
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The walking test involved having the participant walk a distance of 7 m at a self-selected, comfortable pace. A 4-m portion of the test was timed to determine the participant's gait speed in m/s. LS means was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, and fixation type.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, up to 6 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Time to Revision Surgery
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Time to revision surgery was defined as the time from initial hip fracture surgery to revision surgery, or recommendation for revision surgery if recommended but not performed. Time to revision surgery was censored at the date of the last contact.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline to revision surgery (up to 14.14 Months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
SF-12 is a self-reported questionnaire covering a mental component score (MCS) and a physical component score (PCS), each scoring from a 0 to 100 (worst to best) scale. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, fixation type, visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, up to 6 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
WOMAC is: a self-reported questionnaire that consisted of 24 questions covering 3 health domains: Pain (5 items: during walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying, and standing), Stiffness (2 items: after first waking and later in the day), and Physical Function. Each domain was scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 (best to worst) scale. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, fixation type, visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, up to 6 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Health State Score
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a 5-item, self-reported, generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument with 5 items. Overall health state score was also self-reported using a visual analogue scale (VAS) marked on a scale scored from 0 (worse imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, and region.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline, up to 6 Months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Community dwelling men and postmenopausal women who were ambulatory before sustaining a low-trauma, unilateral femoral neck fracture (displaced or nondisplaced)
* Other than femoral neck fracture, be free of incapacitating conditions and have a life expectancy of at least 2 years
* Have received or are eligible for treatment with internal fixation (sliding hip screw or multiple cancellous screws) for the femoral neck fracture (the surgical procedure itself is not performed as part of this study)
* Have given written informed consent (participant or proxy) after being informed of the risks, medications, and study procedures
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Increased baseline risk of osteosarcoma
* History of unresolved skeletal diseases affecting bone metabolism other than primary osteoporosis
* Abnormally elevated serum calcium at screening
* Abnormally elevated serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) (1-84) at screening
* Severe vitamin D deficiency at screening
* Active liver disease or jaundice
* Significantly impaired renal function
* Abnormal thyroid function not corrected by therapy
* History of malignant neoplasm in the 5 years prior to screening
* History of bone marrow or solid organ transplantation
* History of symptomatic nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis in the 1 year prior to screening
* Previous treatment with the following bone active drugs is allowed but must be discontinued at screening: oral bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), calcitonin, estrogen (oral, transdermal, or injectable), progestin, estrogen analog, estrogen agonist, estrogen antagonist or tibolone, and active vitamin D3 analogs. Androgen or other anabolic steroid use must be discontinued, except for use of physiologic replacement testosterone
* Previous treatment with the following bone active drugs is exclusionary, if the stated treatment durations have been met: strontium ranelate for any duration, intravenous bisphosphonates in the 12 months preceding screening, and/or denosumab in the 6 months preceding screening
* Prior treatment with PTH, teriparatide, or other PTH analogs, or prior participation in any other clinical trial studying PTH, teriparatide, or other PTH analogs
* Local or systemic treatment with bone morphogenic proteins or any other growth factor
* Previous fracture(s) or bone surgery in the currently fractured hip
* Soft-tissue infection at the operation site
* Treatment with bone grafting or osteotomies
* Treatment with augmentation using any type of degradable cement, hydroxyapatite-coated implants, or with noninvasive interventions
* Associated major injuries of a lower extremity including fractures of the foot, ankle, tibia, fibula, knee, femur, femoral head or pelvis; dislocations of the ankle, knee or hip
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/02/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/12/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
122
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Penrith
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - St Albans
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2751 - Penrith
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3081 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3021 - St Albans
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Montana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Aarhus
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Hillerod
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Kobenhavn
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Koege
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Estonia
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Tartu
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Oulu
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Turku
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Ahmedabad
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Attavar, Mangalore
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Bangalore
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Hyderabaad
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Nagpur
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Vadodara
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Fukushima
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Gunma
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Ibaraki
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Japan
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Kagawa
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Nagano
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Niigata
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Ohita
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Saga
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Shimane
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Shizuoka
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Toyama
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Toyko
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Yamaguchi
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Yamanashi
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Seongnam-Si
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Riga
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Kaunas
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Klaipeda
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Vilnius
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Takapuna
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Wellington South
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Toensberg
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
San Juan
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Alcira
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Girona
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Guadalajara
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Marbella
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Pozuelo De Alarcon
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Malmo
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Mölndal
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Jhonghe City
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether teriparatide, given for 6 months versus placebo, will improve the healing of hip (femoral neck) fractures that are repaired during surgery using certain types of orthopedic screws. The study will enroll men and postmenopausal women at least 50 years of age with a recent hip (femoral neck) fracture caused by low-trauma (for example, fall from standing height or less).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01473589
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
Query!
Address
0
0
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01473589
Download to PDF