Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12610000925044
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
27/09/2010
Date registered
1/11/2010
Date last updated
3/04/2014
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A comparison of ultrasound guided and nerve stimulator assisted popliteal nerve blocks for foot surgery
Query!
Scientific title
In patients undergoing popliteal nerve blocks for foot surgery, is ultrasound guided administration of the block as good as or better than a nerve stimulator for providing intraoperative and postoperative pain relief?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
252776
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Pain relief during and after foot surgery
258276
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
258468
258468
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Ultrasound nerve localization with a Sonosite Nanomaxx ultrasound system using an L38n ultrasound probe in the 5-10MHz range or
Once the nerves have been adequately localized in the transverse plane below the level of the bifurcation. A double injection - a block of the Common Peroneal nerve and Posterior Tibial nerve is performed, the saphenous nerve is also blocked at the level of the knee
The local anaesthetic agent used is 20ml of Ropivicaine 0.75%
The block is inserted prior to prepping and draping
Query!
Intervention code [1]
257293
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Lateral popliteal block using Nerve stimulation using a Stimuplex A nerve stimulator with a 22G 50mm insulated needle.
A double injection technique to the posterior tibial then the common peroneal is performed after approriate evoked motor response is obtained and the stimulator is reduced to 0.5mA. A sapheneous nerve block at the knee is also performed
20ml of 0.75% Ropivicaine is used
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
259313
0
Post procedure analgesic requirements. The analgesic and dose will be recorded on a form by the anaesthetist intraoperatively and by nursing staff in recovery and then on the ward
Query!
Assessment method [1]
259313
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
259313
0
recorded during operation, at 2 hours, 4 hours and 16 hours post block
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
265734
0
Speed to perform block
Query!
Assessment method [1]
265734
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
265734
0
Measured intraoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
265759
0
Time to onset before 4 hours
Query!
Assessment method [2]
265759
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
265759
0
Assessment of the completeness of the block at 4 hours to be made by the nursing staff
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
265760
0
Patient satisfaction
Query!
Assessment method [3]
265760
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
265760
0
Patients will be asked by the nursing staff on discharge if they were satisfied with the block and analgesia that it provided. This will be recorded on a form
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
265761
0
Residual neurological deficit at 8 weeks
Query!
Assessment method [4]
265761
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
265761
0
At a clinic review at 8 weeks a detailed motor and sensory examination will be recorded on a form to assess any deficit whihc may be block related.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Foot Surgery which will last <90 mins and require an overnight stay.
Calf tourniquet
>18 yrs
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I - III
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
100
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Known neuropathies
Diabetics with a neuropathy
Patients receiving muscle relaxant
Coagulopathy or on Anticoagulants
Infection / Skin problems precluding injection of block
Previous surgery in the popliteal region
Allergy to local anaesthetic
Patients on opioids for chronic analgesic therapy
Patients with a known Chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS) / neuroma
Renal / liver failure where post operative analgesia can not be used
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The patients who meet inclusion criteria at teh time of booking for suregery will be given an information and consent form and asked to participate.
On teh day of surgery a sealed envelope will randomise the patient to either recieve the popliteal block using ultrasound or nerve stimulation assistance.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Block randomisation
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2011
Query!
Actual
7/02/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/12/2014
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
257729
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
257729
0
Mr Harvinder Bedi
Query!
Address [1]
257729
0
Orthosport
Suite 61 Level 6
Epworth Eastern Hospital
1 Arnold Street
Boxhill
Melbourne
VIC 3128
Query!
Country [1]
257729
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Mr Harvinder Bedi
Query!
Address
Orthosport
Suite 61 Level 6
Epworth Eastern Hospital
1 Arnold Street
Boxhill
Melbourne
VIC
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
256944
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
256944
0
Query!
Address [1]
256944
0
Query!
Country [1]
256944
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
259780
0
St Vincents Hospital Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
259780
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
259780
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
259780
0
01/10/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
259780
0
21/12/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
259780
0
HREC/A -155/10
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This project has been designed to investigate whether one particular method of administering local anaesthetic around the knee in order to provide pain relief for patients undergoing foot surgery is better than the other. A routine part of anaesthesia for foot surgery performed in our unit is to perform a popliteal block. This involves injecting local anaesthetic around the nerves behind the knee to numb the foot and provide pain relief both during and after the operation. This block is performed either using an ultrasound machine to visualise the nerves or a nerve stimulator which stimulates the nerve. Both allow the anaesthetist to know the correct position to inject the local anaesthetic. We are planning to randomly allocate patients undergoing foot surgery to receive the block either with the ultrasound machine or with the nerve stimulator. We will then use a form to collect information about pain and pain relief requirements whilst the patient is in hospital to assess the efficacy of the block. We will also collect information about the length time to perform each block and patient satisfaction. Patients will be seen at routine follow up at 8 weeks and assessed to see if there are any ongoing problems related to the nerve block. We will analyse the data to see if one technique is superior to the other and modify our practise as appropriate.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
31708
0
Mr Harvinder Bedi
Query!
Address
31708
0
Orthosport Suite 61 Level 6 Epworth Eastern Hospital 1 Arnold Street Boxhill Melbourne VIC 3128
Query!
Country
31708
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
31708
0
+61 3 9890 0494
Query!
Fax
31708
0
Query!
Email
31708
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
14955
0
Mr Hamish Curry
Query!
Address
14955
0
Orthosport
Suite 61 Level 6
Epworth Eastern Hospital
1 Arnold Street
Boxhill
Melbourne
VIC 3128
Query!
Country
14955
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
14955
0
+61 3 9890 0494
Query!
Fax
14955
0
Query!
Email
14955
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
5883
0
Mr Hamish Curry
Query!
Address
5883
0
Orthosport
Suite 61 Level 6
Epworth Eastern Hospital
1 Arnold Street
Boxhill
Melbourne
VIC 3128
Query!
Country
5883
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
5883
0
+61 3 9890 0494
Query!
Fax
5883
0
Query!
Email
5883
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF