Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611000320954
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
23/03/2011
Date registered
25/03/2011
Date last updated
4/02/2014
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A randomised controlled trial of “light” versus “deep” sedation for elective outpatient colonoscopy: recall, procedural conditions and recovery
Query!
Scientific title
In patients booked for elective, outpatient colonoscopy under sedation are those who are lightly sedated, compared to those deeply sedated, equally likely to have recall of the procedure.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
259846
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1120-2554
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Sedation for colonoscopy
265419
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
265579
265579
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
265597
265597
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Sedation will be with an intravenous infusion of propofol (a IV anaesthetic agent) using TCI effect site steered dosing with a start point of 1.5mcg/ml. This will be titrated by the anaesthetist to achieve the target BIS with no maximum dose. A bolus dose of fentanyl (an opioid) of 0.7mcg/kg to a maximum of 100mcg will be given for those under 70 years, and for those over 70 years this will be 0.5mcg/kg to a maximum of 75mcg. The sedation will continue for the duration of the colonoscopy (usual duration 20-30 mins).
The bispectral index (BIS) is a modified EEG signal which is a validated measure for the depth of anaesthesia which generates a number from 0 (no cortical activity) to 100 (awake). Measurement is made by the placement of a measurement strip on the patient's forehead.
In this study the intervention is "light sedation" in which the BIS target will be 70-80. The propofol infusion will be increased or decreased to remain in this range.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
264265
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The same sedation regime will be used in the "deep sedation" group but the BIS target will be less than 60. The same medications in the same doses will be used in the deep sedation group but titrated to a different endpoint. The eventual propofol effect site target required would be expected to be higher in the deep sedation group. Again, there is no maximum dose specified.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
262379
0
Patient reported rate of recall of procedure.
This will be determined in the recovery room by administration of the modified Brice questionnaire to all patients.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
262379
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
262379
0
On day of procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
273654
0
Rate of cardio-respiratory complications managed by the treating anaesthetist. This is assessed by the completion of a checklist, by the anaesthetist, where the exact parameters defining a complication are specified for the following categories:
Hypoxia
Airway obstruction
Hypotension
Bradycardia
Agitation
None
Query!
Assessment method [1]
273654
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
273654
0
Day of procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
273655
0
Ease of procedural completion recorded on 1-10 scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
273655
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
273655
0
Day of procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
273656
0
Patient satisfaction with care. Patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the sedation they received on a 5 point scale from very satisfied to very dissatisfied.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
273656
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
273656
0
Day of procedure when ready for hospital discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
273657
0
cognitive function at hospital discharge as measured by CogState test battery
Query!
Assessment method [4]
273657
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
273657
0
Day of procedure when ready for hospital discharge
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Booked for elective outpatient colonoscopy under sedation
ASA physical status grade 1-3
Adequate english language comprehension to complete study procedures
Cognitive function sufficient to provide own consent for the procedure
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Booked for combined colonoscopy and gastroscopy
emergency inpatient procedures
significant cardio-respiratory dysfunction (ASA4-5)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Patients booked for elective outpatient colonoscopy will be approached in preadmission clinic or on the day of surgery, given trial information, and asked for consent to participate.
Basic demographic information will be collected and the medical record reviewed to confirm eligibility.
In consenting, eligible participants randomisation to light or deep sedation will occur prior to commencement of clinical care. This will be by the treating anaesthetist opening an opaque envelope labelled with a unique study number. The anaesthetist's cannot be blinded to group allocation as they have to administer the appropriate sedation.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated randomisation schedule
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
28/08/2011
Query!
Actual
6/10/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/10/2013
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
200
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
7181
0
3050 - Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
287644
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
287644
0
ANZCA Project Grant
Query!
Address [1]
287644
0
ANZCA
ANZCA House
630 St Kilda Road
Melbourne Vic 3004
Query!
Country [1]
287644
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Megan Allen
Query!
Address
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
263846
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
263846
0
Query!
Address [1]
263846
0
Query!
Country [1]
263846
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
251894
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
251894
0
Prof Kate Leslie
Query!
Address [1]
251894
0
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkeville, VIC, 3050
Query!
Country [1]
251894
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
266708
0
Melbourne Health HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
266708
0
HREC Office for Research The Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville, VIC, 3050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
266708
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
266708
0
25/03/2011
Query!
Approval date [1]
266708
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
266708
0
2011.066
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In this trial, patients undergoing elective colonoscopy under sedation will be randomised to BIS-guided sedation targeting either “light” or “deep” sedation. Sedation will be achieved with a standardised regimen of target-controlled infusion of propofol and fentanyl bolus. The primary end point will be the incidence of procedure recall in each group. The procedural conditions, cardio-respiratory complications and recovery including cognitive function will be assessed. The patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care will be recorded.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
32376
0
Dr Megan Allen
Query!
Address
32376
0
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management The Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville, VIC, 3050
Query!
Country
32376
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
32376
0
+61 3 9342 7000
Query!
Fax
32376
0
Query!
Email
32376
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
15623
0
Dr Megan Allen
Query!
Address
15623
0
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, VIC, 3050
Query!
Country
15623
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
15623
0
61-3-93427540
Query!
Fax
15623
0
61-(0)3-93428623
Query!
Email
15623
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
6551
0
Dr Megan Allen
Query!
Address
6551
0
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, VIC, 3050
Query!
Country
6551
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
6551
0
61-3-93427540
Query!
Fax
6551
0
61-(0)3-93428623
Query!
Email
6551
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF