Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611000494932
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/05/2011
Date registered
11/05/2011
Date last updated
11/05/2011
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A study comparing the surgical and patient outcomes with different pre-surgery diet regimes with or without bowel preparation solution for laparoscopic gynaecological surgery
Query!
Scientific title
A Single Blind Randomised Controlled Trial of Surgical and Patient Outcomes using Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgery
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
262137
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
benign gynaecological pathology requiring laparoscopic surgery
265815
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
265969
265969
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
1. Fasting only group - participants in this group have normal diet until the day before surgery (without fluid restriction) where they fast from midnight the night before surgery (including fluids)
2. Minimal residue diet group - 2 days of liquid diet before the surgery; 2 days before surgery - full liquid diet (milk shakes, pumpkin soup, orange juice etc), 1 day before surgery - clear liquod diet (eg apple juice, chicken broth, jelly etc), and fast from midnight the night before if the surgery is in the morning, or from 6am for afternoon surgery (including fluids)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
264551
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Minimal residue diet (as described above) for 2 days with mechanical bowel preparation solution (1 sachet of PicoPrep - 15.546g sodium picosulphate solution) where first sachet is taken no later than 3pm the day before the surgery, and second sachet taken 4 hours later.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
266712
0
surgical visual field and bowel handling
Query!
Assessment method [1]
266712
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
266712
0
at the time of surgery, using Visual analogue scale (VAS)and Verbal descriptor scale (VDS)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
276234
0
change in patient symptomatology, using VAS and VDS on the symptoms of headache, nausea & vomiting, thirst, weakness, tiredness and overall level of discomfort
Query!
Assessment method [1]
276234
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
276234
0
baseline (at the time of recruitment for the study- anytime before 2 days prior to surgery)
On the day of surgery, prior to the procedure
1 day after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
276235
0
change in patient's bowel function, using a validated questionnaire (colorectal functional outcome questionnaire, as well as Hallbook & Vaizey questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [2]
276235
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
276235
0
basesline (time of recruitment of study)
1 week after surgery
1 month after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
276236
0
change in patient's electrolyte and haematocrit, using meaurement of patient's serum EUC & FBC level from blood sample
Query!
Assessment method [3]
276236
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
276236
0
baseline (time of recruitment of study)
on the day of surgery, prior to the procedure
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Female aged 18 to 80 years
Fluent in spoken and written English
Capable of completing questions relating to pain
Able to understand implications of their involvement in the study
Consent to involvement in the study
Is a patient of the Department of Endo-Gynaecology, Royal Hospital for Women
Consented and scheduled to undergo a gynaecological laparoscopic procedure possibly involving the posterior pelvic compartment requiring mechanical bowel preparation
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
May become distressed due to involvement in the study
Is currently involved in any other research project
Any intercurrent condition that, in the investigator’s opinion, precludes a patient from participating in the study
Known or suspected pregnancy
Suspected gynaecological malignancy
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The allocation concealment will be achieved by telephone allocation by a third party research assistant not involved in patient recruitment or data collection.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation will be by computer generated sequence in balanced blocks
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
24/11/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
246
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
265029
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
265029
0
AGES (Australasian Gynaecological Endoscopy & Surgery)
Query!
Address [1]
265029
0
282 Edinburgh Road
Castlecrag
NSW 2068
Query!
Country [1]
265029
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of New South Wales
Query!
Address
High St
Sydney NSW 2052
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
264127
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
264127
0
Query!
Address [1]
264127
0
Query!
Country [1]
264127
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
267021
0
Human Research Ethics Committee - South Eastern Sydney Local Health Network (Northern Sector)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
267021
0
Room G71, East Wing, Edmund Blacket Building
Prince of Wales Hospital
Barker St Randwick NSW
2031
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
267021
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
267021
0
26/08/2008
Query!
Approval date [1]
267021
0
17/11/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
267021
0
1/08/0096
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the levels of discomfort a patient experiences, to compare the effects on blood components and to compare the surgical outcomes associated with different modes of bowel preparation before gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive surgical technique, for which you have already been admitted to this hospital. Prior to surgery, it is standard procedure in this department for patients to take mechanical bowel preparation. This involves following a diet and then taking a proprietary drink to assist in emptying the bowels. Traditionally, the emptying of the bowels is believed to improve the visualisation of abdominal contents as well as potentially decrease complication rates involving the bowel, though there is not a lot of scientific proof that this is the case. Recent research in gynaecological and bowel surgery has shown that mechanical bowel preparation may not be necessary.
In this study, patients will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:
1. Women in group one will only fast (not have anything to eat or drink) before their surgery
2. Women in group two will fast and undertake a minimal residue diet
3. Women in group three will undertake a minimal residue diet and take mechanical bowel preparation as directed.
You will have a 33% chance of being in any of the three groups. Neither the doctor nor the study participant can decide which bowel preparation the patient will undertake. This study will be a single blind trial. This means that the doctor will not know which bowel preparation the participant has taken.
When you have been assigned to one group, we will provide a detailed outline of the bowel preparation you need to undertake. A study team member will contact you before your surgery to ensure that you know which group you are in and to remind you of the procedures. The knowledge gained from this study will allow us to estimate whether one type of bowel preparation is significantly better for patients, enabling us to provide a better quality of care for all women.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
32588
0
Query!
Address
32588
0
Query!
Country
32588
0
Query!
Phone
32588
0
Query!
Fax
32588
0
Query!
Email
32588
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
15835
0
Dr HaRyun Won
Query!
Address
15835
0
Royal Hospital for Women
Barker St
Randwick NSW 2031
Query!
Country
15835
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
15835
0
+61 2 9382 6111
Query!
Fax
15835
0
Query!
Email
15835
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
6763
0
Dr HaRyun Won
Query!
Address
6763
0
Royal Hospital for Women
Barker St
Randwick NSW 2031
Query!
Country
6763
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
6763
0
+61 2 9382 6111
Query!
Fax
6763
0
Query!
Email
6763
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF