Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612000162819
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
17/01/2012
Date registered
6/02/2012
Date last updated
6/02/2012
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Using ketamine (an anesthetic agent) with Propofol (a hypnotic agent commonly used during sedation) during visual examination of large intestine reduces propofol dosage improves the quality of sedation
Query!
Scientific title
Propofol in combination with ketamin reduces propofol dosage and improves quality of sedation during colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized and double blind study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
279731
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1127-1936
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Patients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation
285576
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
285770
285770
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Anaesthesiology
285771
285771
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients were randomized to 2 groups according to applied sedation protocol as follows.
Group 1: intravenous bolus saline was administred before propofol
Group 2: intravenous bolus 0.25 mg/kg ketamine was administered before propofol.
In each group propofol dosage was titrated according to patients sedation level. For both groups target sedation level was 1-2 with Modified Observer's assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
284030
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Saline is used in propofol group
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
286289
0
The amount of propofol used during sedation in each groups. Total propofol dosage used during all procedures will be recorded after the procedures are completed.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
286289
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
286289
0
After the procedure
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
286290
0
Quality of Sedation
Assessed both by patients with questionniares and by the endoscopists.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
286290
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
286290
0
Questionnaires were performed to patients before discharging and 24 hours after the procedure.
Endoscopist was asked to evaluate the quality of sedation at the end of the procedure between 0 and 10 (0: worst and 10:best)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
295534
0
Frequency of adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, agitation, dreaming. The patients will be observed for the adverse events after the procedure until discharge. Therefore clinical assessment will be used.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
295534
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
295534
0
During and after the procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
295535
0
Recovery time;
Time to spontaneous eye opening, time to discharge and aldrette scores.
The aldrete score is a score of 1 through 10 assessing a patient after anesthesia for discharge criteria. The Aldrete score assesses level of consciousness, respirtory status, circulatory status, activity and oxygen saturation
Query!
Assessment method [2]
295535
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
295535
0
After the procedure
Aldrette scores were recorded at 2.5 minutes intervals after the procedure
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
ASA I-II patients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Use of anti-anxiety medicine within 48 hours before the procedure, past history of anorectal, colonic and gynecologic surgery and complaint of pain at the anal area precluding examination
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Block randomization was used to keep the sample size of the groups similar. Random Allocation Software (Ver. 1.0.0) was used to allocate the patients to groups.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/09/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
4053
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [1]
4053
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
284512
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
284512
0
Mesa Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
284512
0
Yasam Caddesi No:5
06510, Sogutozu, Ankara
Query!
Country [1]
284512
0
Turkey
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Prof. Mehmet Ayhan KUZU
Query!
Address
Ankara University, Faculity of Medicine
Department of surgery 06100
Samanpazari, Ankara
Query!
Country
Turkey
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
283442
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
283442
0
Query!
Address [1]
283442
0
Query!
Country [1]
283442
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
286496
0
Ethics Commitee of Ankara University School of Medicine
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
286496
0
Ankara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Morfoloji Yerleskesi 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
286496
0
Turkey
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
286496
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
286496
0
15/10/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
286496
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
286497
0
Ministry of Health of Turkey Ethics Commitee of General Directorate of Pharmaceuticals and Pharmacy
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
286497
0
Sogutozu Mahallesi 2176 sokak No:5 06520 Cankaya, Ankara
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
286497
0
Turkey
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
286497
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
286497
0
20/09/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
286497
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Propofol is frequently used for sedation in endoscopy units. Usually opioids are used in combination to propofol in order to improve the quality of sedation. However combining opioids with propofol usually raises the incidance of adverse events such as apnea. Ketamine is usually used for sedation for invasive procedures outside the operating room especially in children. Its not preffered in adults for sedation because of agitation and hallucinations which can be prevented by using sedative or hypnotic agents. The most important advantage of using ketamine is that it does not supress the airway reflexes. Thus it can be hypotised that ketamine may be a better agent of choice than opioids to combine with propofol during sedation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of ketamine added to propofol in terms of propofol sparing effects, quality of sedation, adverse events and recovery times.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
33634
0
Query!
Address
33634
0
Query!
Country
33634
0
Query!
Phone
33634
0
Query!
Fax
33634
0
Query!
Email
33634
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
16881
0
Hasan Kutluk Pampal
Query!
Address
16881
0
Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakültesi
Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimason AD
06500, Besevler, Ankara
Query!
Country
16881
0
Turkey
Query!
Phone
16881
0
+905325569624
Query!
Fax
16881
0
Query!
Email
16881
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
7809
0
Hasan Kutluk Pampal
Query!
Address
7809
0
Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakültesi
Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimason AD
06500, Besevler, Ankara
Query!
Country
7809
0
Turkey
Query!
Phone
7809
0
+905325569624
Query!
Fax
7809
0
Query!
Email
7809
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF