Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01568866
Registration number
NCT01568866
Ethics application status
Date submitted
28/03/2012
Date registered
2/04/2012
Date last updated
14/11/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
Phase 3 Study With Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib Plus Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2012-000128-16
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
2011-003
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
ENDEAVOR
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Multiple Myeloma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other cancer types
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Carfilzomib
Treatment: Drugs - Bortezomib
Treatment: Drugs - Dexamethasone
Experimental: Carfilzomib plus Dexamethasone - Participants received 20 mg/m² carfilzomib administered by intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1 and 2 of Cycle 1, followed by 56 mg/m² on Days 8, 9, 15, and 16 of Cycle 1 and for each 28-day cycle thereafter. Additionally, participants received 20 mg dexamethasone on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 of each 28 day cycle.
Active comparator: Bortezomib plus Dexamethasone - Participants received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² administered IV or subcutaneously (SC) on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle plus dexamethasone 20 mg administered on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of each 21-day cycle.
Treatment: Drugs: Carfilzomib
Carfilzomib is administered over 30 minutes as an infusion.
Treatment: Drugs: Bortezomib
Bortezomib is administered as a 3-5 second bolus IV injection or SC injection (in accordance with regulatory approval)
Treatment: Drugs: Dexamethasone
Tablet for oral administration; On days when carfilzomib or bortezomib was administered, the dexamethasone was to be given 30 minutes to 4 hours prior to the carfilzomib or bortezomib dose.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants were evaluated for disease response and progression according to the International Myeloma Working Group-Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC) as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).
Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants with no baseline disease assessments, starting a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit, or alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date were censored.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median follow-up time for PFS was 11.1.and 11.9 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause). Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up as of the data analysis cut-off date were censored at the patient's date of last contact (last known to be alive).
Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 03 January 2017; median follow-up time for OS was 36.9 and 37.5 months for each treatment group respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Overall Response
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Disease response was evaluated according to the IMWG-URC by the IRC. Overall response was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of partial response (PR), very good PR (VGPR), complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR).
sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM).
CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or = 90% reduction in serum M-protein with urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours. A = 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline.
PR: = 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by = 90% or to \< 200 mg/24 hours. A = 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Duration of Response
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Duration of response (DOR) was calculated for participants who achieved an sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR. Duration of response is defined as the time from first evidence of PR or better to confirmation of disease progression or death due to any cause. Median duration of response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants with no baseline disease assessments, starting a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit, or alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date were censored.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median follow-up time for DOR was 9.4 and 10.4 months for each treatment group respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With = Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Neuropathy events were defined as Grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy as specified by peripheral neuropathy Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query, narrow (scope) (SMQN) terms.
Peripheral neuropathy was assessed by neurologic exam and graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03:
Grade 1: Asymptomatic; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms, limiting instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) Grade 3: Severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug as of the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Significant Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
A significant reduction in LVEF was defined as a = 10% decrease (absolute change) from baseline in participants whose baseline LVEF is = 55%.
For participants with LVEF \> 55% at baseline, a significant change was defined as a decrease in LVEF to \< 45%.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change (FAC)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Right ventricular function was assessed by measuring fractional area change (FAC) on echocardiogram.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 12, 24 and 36 and at end of treatment (median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group).
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Pulmonary artery pressure was measured using transthoracic echocardiogram.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 12, 24 and 36 and at end of treatment (median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Multiple myeloma with relapsing or progressing disease at study entry.
2. Patients must have evaluable multiple myeloma with, at least one of the following (assessed within 21 days prior to randomization):
* Serum M-protein = 0.5 g/dL, or
* Urine M-protein = 200 mg/24 hour, or
* In patients without detectable serum or urine M-protein, serum free light chain (SFLC) > 100 mg/L (involved light chain) and an abnormal serum kappa/lamda ratio, or
* For immunoglobulin (Ig) A patients whose disease can only be reliably measured by serum quantitative immunoglobulin (qIgA) = 750 mg/dL (0.75 g/dL).
3. Patients must have documented at least partial response (PR) to at least 1 line of prior therapy. PR documentation can be based on Investigator assessment.
4. Received 1, but no more than 3 prior treatment regimens or lines of therapy for multiple myeloma. (Induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant and consolidation/maintenance therapy will be considered as one line of therapy).
5. Prior therapy with Velcade is allowed as long as the patient had at least a PR to prior Velcade therapy, was not removed from Velcade therapy due to toxicity, and will have at least a 6 month Velcade treatment-free interval from last dose received until first study treatment. (Patients may receive maintenance therapy with drugs that are not in the proteasome inhibitor class during this 6 month Velcade treatment-free interval).
6. Prior therapy with carfilzomib is allowed as long as the patient had at least a PR to prior carfilzomib therapy, was not removed from carfilzomib therapy due to toxicity, and had at least a 6-month carfilzomib treatment-free interval from last dose received until first study treatment. (Patients may receive maintenance therapy with drugs that are not in the proteasome inhibitor class during this 6 month carfilzomib treatment-free interval). The exception to this is patients randomized or previously randomized in any other Onyx-Sponsored Phase 3 trial.
7. Males and females = 18 years of age.
8. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 to 2.
9. Adequate hepatic function within 21 days prior to randomization, with bilirubin < 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 3 times the ULN.
10. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = 40%.
11. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1000/mm³ within 21 days prior to randomization. Screening ANC should be independent of growth factor support for = 1 week.
12. Hemoglobin = 8.0 g/dL within 21 days prior to randomization. Use of erythropoietic stimulating factors and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions per institutional guidelines is allowed, however most recent RBC transfusion may not have been done within 7 days prior to obtaining screening hemoglobin.
13. Platelet count = 50,000/mm³ (= 30,000/mm³ if myeloma involvement in the bone marrow is > 50%) within 21 days prior to randomization. Patients should not have received platelet transfusions for at least 1 week prior to obtaining the screening platelet count.
14. Calculated or measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) of = 15 mL/min within 21 days prior to randomization. Calculation should be based on standard formula such as the Cockcroft and Gault:
[(140 - Age) x Mass (kg) / (72 x Creatinine mg/dL)]; multiply result by 0.85 if female.
15. Written informed consent in accordance with federal, local, and institutional guidelines.
16. Female patients of child-bearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 21 days prior to randomization and agree to use an effective method of contraception during and for 3 months following last dose of drug (more frequent pregnancy tests may be conducted if required per local regulations). FCBP is defined as a sexually mature woman who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months).
17. Male patients must use an effective barrier method of contraception during study and for 3 months following the last dose if sexually active with a FCBP.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Multiple Myeloma of IgM subtype.
2. Glucocorticoid therapy (prednisone > 30 mg/day or equivalent) within 14 days prior to randomization.
3. POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes).
4. Plasma cell leukemia or circulating plasma cells = 2 × 10^9/L.
5. Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.
6. Patients with known amyloidosis.
7. Chemotherapy with approved or investigational anticancer therapeutics within 21 days prior to randomization.
8. Patients randomized or previously randomized in any other Onyx-Sponsored Phase 3 trial.
9. Focal radiation therapy within 7 days prior to randomization. Radiation therapy to an extended field involving a significant volume of bone marrow within 21 days prior to randomization (i.e., prior radiation must have been to less than 30% of the bone marrow).
10. Immunotherapy within 21 days prior to randomization.
11. Major surgery (excluding kyphoplasty) within 28 days prior to randomization.
12. Active congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III to IV), symptomatic ischemia, or conduction abnormalities uncontrolled by conventional intervention. Myocardial infarction within four months prior to randomization.
13. Acute active infection requiring systemic antibiotics, antiviral (except antiviral therapy directed at hepatitis B) or antifungal agents within 14 days prior to randomization.
14. Known human immunodeficiency (HIV) seropositive, hepatitis C infection, and/or hepatitis B (except for patients with hepatitis B surface antigen [SAg] or core antibody receiving and responding to antiviral therapy directed at hepatitis B: these patients are allowed).
15. Patients with known cirrhosis.
16. Second malignancy within the past 3 years except:
* adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer
* carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* prostate cancer < Gleason score 6 with stable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) over 12 months
* breast carcinoma in situ with full surgical resection
* treated medullary or papillary thyroid cancer
17. Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
18. Significant neuropathy (Grades 3 to 4, or Grade 2 with pain) within 14 days prior to randomization.
19. Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
20. Known history of allergy to Captisol(a cyclodextrin derivative used to solubilize carfilzomib).
21. Patients with hypersensitivity to carfilzomib, Velcade, boron, or mannitol.
22. Patients with contraindication to dexamethasone.
23. Contraindication to any of the required concomitant drugs or supportive treatments, including hypersensitivity to antiviral drugs, or intolerance to hydration due to preexisting pulmonary or cardiac impairment.
24. Ongoing graft-vs-host disease.
25. Patients with pleural effusions requiring thoracentesis or ascites requiring paracentesis within 14 days prior to randomization.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
20/06/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/02/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
929
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
St. Vincent's Public Hospital Sydney - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Saint George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Liverpool Hospital - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Royal North Shore Hospital - Saint Leonards
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Calvary Mater Newcastle - Waratah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Haematology & Oncology Clinics of Australia - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Haematology and Oncology Clinics of Australia at Chermside - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
0
0
Haematology and Oncology Clinics of Australia at Wesley - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [12]
0
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [13]
0
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woodville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [14]
0
0
Box Hill Hospital - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [15]
0
0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [16]
0
0
Saint Vincent's Hospital - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [17]
0
0
Western Hospital - Footscray
Query!
Recruitment hospital [18]
0
0
The Alfred Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [19]
0
0
Sunshine Hospital - St. Albans
Query!
Recruitment hospital [20]
0
0
Fremantle Hospital - Fremantle
Query!
Recruitment hospital [21]
0
0
Royal Perth Hospital - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Saint Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
- Waratah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
- Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
- Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
- South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
0
0
- Woodville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
0
0
- Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
0
0
- Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [14]
0
0
- East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [15]
0
0
- Footscray
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [16]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [17]
0
0
- St. Albans
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [18]
0
0
- Fremantle
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [19]
0
0
- Perth
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Tyrol
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Upper Austria
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Flemish Brabant
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Namur
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Oost-vlaanderen
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Antwerp
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
RIO Grande DO Norte
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
RIO Grande DO SUL
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
SAO Paulo
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Rio de Janeiro
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Sofiya
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
New Brunswick
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Severomoravsky KRAJ
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Vychodocesky KRAJ
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Aquitaine
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Bretagne
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Cedex 1
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Haute-normandie
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Ile-de-france
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
NORD Pas-de-calais
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
PAYS DE LA Loire
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Provence Alpes COTE D'azur
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Rhone-alpes
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Baden-wuerttemberg
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Nordrhein-westfalen
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Rheinland-pfalz
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Saarland
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Sachsen
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Thuringen
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Attica
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Bacs-kiskun
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Baranya
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Csongrad
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Hajdu-bihar
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Kaposvár
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Kfar Saba
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Tel Aviv
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Tel Hashomer
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Potenza
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Torino
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Ancona
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Brescia
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Genova
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Novara
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Piacenza
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Pisa
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Siena
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Gifu
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Gunma
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Niigata
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Saitama
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Tochigi
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Kyoto
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Tokushima
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Gyeonggi-Do
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Gyeongsangnam-Do
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Aukland
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Dunedin
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Kujawsko-Pomorskie
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Lubelskie
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Malopolskie
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Mazowieckie
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Pomorskie
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Slaskie
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Wielkopolskie
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Bucuresti
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Brasov
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Iasi
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Izhevsk
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
Ryazan
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Samara
Query!
Country [125]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [125]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [126]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [126]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [127]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [127]
0
0
Baleares
Query!
Country [128]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [128]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [129]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [129]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [130]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [130]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [131]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [131]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [132]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [132]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [133]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [133]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [134]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [134]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [135]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [135]
0
0
Tainan
Query!
Country [136]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [136]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [137]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [137]
0
0
Tao-Yuan
Query!
Country [138]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [138]
0
0
Bangkok Metropolis
Query!
Country [139]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [139]
0
0
Khon Kaen
Query!
Country [140]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [140]
0
0
Dnipropretrovsk
Query!
Country [141]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [141]
0
0
Kharkiv
Query!
Country [142]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [142]
0
0
Cherkassy
Query!
Country [143]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [143]
0
0
Dnipropetrovsk
Query!
Country [144]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [144]
0
0
Donetsk
Query!
Country [145]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [145]
0
0
Khmelnytsky
Query!
Country [146]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [146]
0
0
Kiev
Query!
Country [147]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [147]
0
0
Kyiv
Query!
Country [148]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [148]
0
0
Lviv
Query!
Country [149]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [149]
0
0
Mykolayiv
Query!
Country [150]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [150]
0
0
England
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Amgen
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study was to compare progression-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma who relapsed after 1 to 3 prior therapies treated with carfilzomib plus dexamethasone or bortezomib plus dexamethasone.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01568866
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Moreau P, Joshua D, Chng WJ, Palumbo A, Goldschmidt H, Hajek R, Facon T, Ludwig H, Pour L, Niesvizky R, Oriol A, Rosinol L, Suvorov A, Gaidano G, Pika T, Weisel K, Goranova-Marinova V, Gillenwater HH, Mohamed N, Aggarwal S, Feng S, Dimopoulos MA. Impact of prior treatment on patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study. Leukemia. 2017 Jan;31(1):115-122. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.186. Epub 2016 Jul 4. Chng WJ, Goldschmidt H, Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Joshua D, Palumbo A, Facon T, Ludwig H, Pour L, Niesvizky R, Oriol A, Rosinol L, Suvorov A, Gaidano G, Pika T, Weisel K, Goranova-Marinova V, Gillenwater HH, Mohamed N, Feng S, Aggarwal S, Hajek R. Carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR. Leukemia. 2017 Jun;31(6):1368-1374. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.390. Epub 2016 Dec 27. Dimopoulos MA, Goldschmidt H, Niesvizky R, Joshua D, Chng WJ, Oriol A, Orlowski RZ, Ludwig H, Facon T, Hajek R, Weisel K, Hungria V, Minuk L, Feng S, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Kimball AS, Moreau P. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1327-1337. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8. Epub 2017 Aug 23. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):e562. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30721-0. Ludwig H, Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Chng WJ, Goldschmidt H, Hajek R, Facon T, Pour L, Niesvizky R, Oriol A, Rosinol L, Suvorov A, Gaidano G, Pika T, Weisel K, Goranova-Marinova V, Palumbo A, Gillenwater HH, Mohamed N, Aggarwal S, Feng S, Joshua D. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: results of the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR (NCT01568866) according to age subgroup. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Oct;58(10):2501-2504. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1298755. Epub 2017 Mar 17. No abstract available. Chari A, Stewart AK, Russell SD, Moreau P, Herrmann J, Banchs J, Hajek R, Groarke J, Lyon AR, Batty GN, Ro S, Huang M, Iskander KS, Lenihan D. Analysis of carfilzomib cardiovascular safety profile across relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma clinical trials. Blood Adv. 2018 Jul 10;2(13):1633-1644. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017015545. Dimopoulos M, Siegel D, White DJ, Boccia R, Iskander KS, Yang Z, Kimball AS, Mezzi K, Ludwig H, Niesvizky R. Carfilzomib vs bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma and renal failure: a subgroup analysis of ENDEAVOR. Blood. 2019 Jan 10;133(2):147-155. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-860015. Epub 2018 Nov 26. Facon T, Niesvizky R, Mateos MV, Siegel D, Rosenbaum C, Bringhen S, Weisel K, Ho PJ, Ludwig H, Kumar S, Wang K, Obreja M, Yang Z, Klippel Z, Mezzi K, Goldrick A, Tekle C, Dimopoulos MA. Efficacy and safety of carfilzomib-based regimens in frail patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5449-5459. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001965. Hari P, Mateos MV, Abonour R, Knop S, Bensinger W, Ludwig H, Song K, Hajek R, Moreau P, Siegel DS, Feng S, Obreja M, Aggarwal SK, Iskander K, Goldschmidt H. Efficacy and safety of carfilzomib regimens in multiple myeloma patients relapsing after autologous stem cell transplant: ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR outcomes. Leukemia. 2017 Dec;31(12):2630-2641. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.122. Epub 2017 Apr 25. Leleu X, Martin TG, Einsele H, Lyons RM, Durie BGM, Iskander KS, Ailawadhi S. Role of Proteasome Inhibitors in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Jan;19(1):9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Sep 5. Ludwig H, Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Mateos MV, Kaiser M, Hajek R, Feng S, Cocks K, Buchanan J, Weisel K. Health-related quality of life in the ENDEAVOR study: carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2019 Feb 22;9(3):23. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0181-0. Mateos MV, Goldschmidt H, San-Miguel J, Mikhael J, DeCosta L, Zhou L, Obreja M, Blaedel J, Szabo Z, Leleu X. Carfilzomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients with early or late relapse following prior therapy: A subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR trials. Hematol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(2):463-470. doi: 10.1002/hon.2499. Epub 2018 Feb 15. Moreau P, Stewart KA, Dimopoulos M, Siegel D, Facon T, Berenson J, Raje N, Berdeja JG, Orlowski RZ, Yang H, Ma H, Klippel Z, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Mezzi K, Iskander K, Mateos MV. Once-weekly (70 mg/m2 ) vs twice-weekly (56 mg/m2 ) dosing of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A post hoc analysis of the ENDEAVOR, A.R.R.O.W., and CHAMPION-1 trials. Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):2989-2996. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2945. Epub 2020 Feb 28. Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Iida S, Huang SY, Takezako N, Chng WJ, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Sersch MA, Li J, Huang M, Lee JH. Outcomes for Asian patients with multiple myeloma receiving once- or twice-weekly carfilzomib-based therapy: a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 ENDEAVOR and A.R.R.O.W. Trials. Int J Hematol. 2019 Oct;110(4):466-473. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02704-z. Epub 2019 Aug 6. Goldschmidt H, Moreau P, Ludwig H, Niesvizky R, Chng WJ, Joshua D, Weisel K, Spencer A, Orlowski RZ, Feng S, Iskander KS, Dimopoulos MA. Carfilzomib-dexamethasone versus subcutaneous or intravenous bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: secondary analysis of the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Jun;59(6):1364-1374. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1376743. Epub 2017 Sep 22. Jakubowiak AJ, Houisse I, Majer I, Benedict A, Campioni M, Panjabi S, Ailawadhi S. Cost-effectiveness of carfilzomib plus dexamethasone compared with bortezomib plus dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States. Expert Rev Hematol. 2017 Dec;10(12):1107-1119. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1391088. Weisel K, Mateos MV, Gay F, Delforge M, Cook G, Szabo Z, Desgraz R, DeCosta L, Moreau P. Efficacy and safety profile of deep responders to carfilzomib-based therapy: a subgroup analysis from ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR. Leukemia. 2021 Jun;35(6):1732-1744. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01049-5. Epub 2020 Oct 16. Weisel K, Majer I, DeCosta L, Oriol A, Goldschmidt H, Ludwig H, Campioni M, Szabo Z, Dimopoulos M. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus eight cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an indirect comparison using data from the phase 3 ENDEAVOR and CASTOR trials. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jan;61(1):37-46. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1648806. Epub 2019 Oct 22. Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Niesvizky R, Ludwig H, Oriol A, Chng WJ, Goldschmidt H, Yang Z, Kimball AS, Dimopoulos M. Carfilzomib-Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Overall Survival, Safety, and Subgroups. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Aug;19(8):522-530.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 May 2. Majer IM, Castaigne JG, Palmer S, DeCosta L, Campioni M. Modeling Covariate-Adjusted Survival for Economic Evaluations in Oncology. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 May;37(5):727-737. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0759-6. Rosenthal A, Luthi J, Belohlavek M, Kortum KM, Mookadam F, Mayo A, Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Reeder CB, Mikhael JR, Stewart AK. Carfilzomib and the cardiorenal system in myeloma: an endothelial effect? Blood Cancer J. 2016 Jan 15;6(1):e384. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.112. Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Joshua D, Pour L, Hajek R, Facon T, Ludwig H, Oriol A, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, Straub J, Suvorov A, Araujo C, Rimashevskaya E, Pika T, Gaidano G, Weisel K, Goranova-Marinova V, Schwarer A, Minuk L, Masszi T, Karamanesht I, Offidani M, Hungria V, Spencer A, Orlowski RZ, Gillenwater HH, Mohamed N, Feng S, Chng WJ; ENDEAVOR Investigators. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Amgen
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01568866
Download to PDF