Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612000260820
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/03/2012
Date registered
2/03/2012
Date last updated
5/03/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Utility of ultrasound when using shock wave therapy to treat painful calcification in shoulder tendons, achilles tendons and plantar fasciitis with heel spur.
Query!
Scientific title
Randomised controlled trial comparing ultrasound-guided to patient-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for calcific soft tissue pathologies (including tendinopathy) when assessing patient outcomes of decreased pain, improved function and reduced calcification size.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280023
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1128-8348
Query!
Trial acronym
Nil
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Painful calcific soft tissue pathologies including tendinopathy.
285934
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
286124
286124
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
All patients will receive active treatment i.e. shockwave therapy, with the SHOCK WAVE THERAPY PROTOCOL described as below:
1. NUMBER & FREQUENCY OF TREATMENT SESSIONS:
3-5 treatment sessions.
Treatment sessions will be spaced at 1 week intervals.
(NB.Number of sessions of treatment are based on patient's response to treatment. All patients will receive 3 treatment sessions. Patients who feel they have not had a decrease in their pain or improvement in function can have an additional 2 treatment sessions).
2. DURATION OF TREATMENT SESSIONS:
Each treatment session will take between 20-30mins depending on the arm of the study.
Arm 1 (patient-guided shockwave treatment) will take about 20 mins. Arm 2 ( ultrasound-guided shockwave treatment) will take about 30 mins with the additional 10 mins needed to locate the calcification on ultrasound prior to treatment. All session times also include filling out questionnaire prior to treatment, setting up the patient for treatment and arranging the follow up appointment or answering any questions. The shockwave treatment itself takes less than 5 mins.
3.SHOCKWAVE MACHINE SETTINGS:
2000 Impulses, 20 Hz , over a range of 1.4-2 bar.
4. THE TWO STUDY ARMS OF PARTICIPANTS:
Arm 1: Patient-guided shock wave therapy to the area where the most pain is felt in relation to the area of calcification.
Arm 2: Ultrasound-guided shock wave therapy to the exact site of calcification.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
284389
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Shockwave therapy protocol: 3-5 sessions, at 1 week intervals. Shock wave settings at: 2000 Impulses, 20 Hz , over a range of 1.4-2 bar.
Active control: (Arm 1 as above) patient-guided shockwave therapy to the area where the most pain is felt in relation to the area of calcification.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
286599
0
Patient pain - using a 10 cm visual analogue scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
286599
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
286599
0
At baseline; during treatment ( prior to each weekly shock wave therapy); following the final shock wave therapy at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
286600
0
Function - using patient-filled questionnaires relevant to the site of calcification: Constant & Murley Score for shoulder function in calcific shoulder tendinopathy; Victorian Institute of Sport Achillles ( VISA-A) for insertional achilles tendinopathy and; Maryland Foot Score for plantar fasciitis with heel spur.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
286600
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
286600
0
At baseline; during treatment ( prior to each weekly shock wave therapy); following the final shock wave therapy at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
296239
0
Calcification size- measured using the investigators ultrasound machine
Query!
Assessment method [1]
296239
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
296239
0
Measured following the final shock wave therapy at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Pain in one of 3 areas - either shoulder rotator cuff tendon, achilles tendon or plantar fascia; Proven calcification visible on previous imaging;Calcification visible on our ( the investigator's) ultrasound machine; Males and non-pregnant females; fluent in english; able to give informed consent; seeking to try shockwave treatment as a method to resolve the pain; willing and able to follow the research protocol
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Calcification unable to be seen on our ( the investigator's) ultrasound machine; unable to follow the protocol; unable to tolerate the shock wave treatment according to the protocol because it is too painful; corticosteriod injection to the area inthe last 3 months ( as this may affect treatment efficacy); pregnancy or suspected pregnancy during the study; cancer; local lesions or non-intact skin; osteoarthritis at treatment site; Polyneuropathy; bleeding or clotting conditions; anticoagulation medications; allergy to ultrasound gel.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Letters of recruitement for study will be sent to health care professionals (eg. orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, sports medicine doctors, podiatrists). Patients fitting inclusion criteria will be referred to our clinic. Referred, voluntary patients eligible for the study will be randomly allocated to either the "patient-guided" or "ultrasound guided " . Allocation will be by concealment in opaque envelopes. The person giving the shock wave therapy and the patient will not be aware as to which group the patient is in until the envelope is opened prior to the first shock wave treatment.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Stratified randomisation. Randomisation done by generating three random number lists (based on site of calcification either shoulder, achilles or plantar fascia) using an excel computer programme. Numbers in each list allocated to either arm 1 ( patient-guided shock wave therapy) or arm 2 ( ultrasound-guided shock wave therapy). Treatment arm put in an opaque envelope. Envelopes numbered sequentially on the outside according to participant number at presentation for treatment.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/03/2012
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
120
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
284780
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
284780
0
DJO international
Query!
Address [1]
284780
0
P.O Box 2057
Normanhurst, NSW 2076
Query!
Country [1]
284780
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr John Orchard
Query!
Address
The Sports Clinic at Sydney University
University of Sydney
Cnr Western Ave & Physics Road
Camperdown
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
283667
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
283667
0
Dr Masiiwa Njawaya
Query!
Address [1]
283667
0
The Sports Clinic at Sydney University
University of Sydney
Cnr Western Ave & Physics Road
Camperdown
NSW 2006
Query!
Country [1]
283667
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
260571
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
260571
0
Dr Tim Driscoll
Query!
Address [1]
260571
0
A27 Edward Ford Building
University of Sydney,
Camperdown
NSW 2006
Query!
Country [1]
260571
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
260572
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
260572
0
Jessica Orchard
Query!
Address [2]
260572
0
NSW Cancer Council
153 Dowling St
Woolloomooloo
NSW 2011
Query!
Country [2]
260572
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
286772
0
Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
286772
0
Level6 Jane Foss Russell Building G02 University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
286772
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
286772
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
286772
0
22/02/2012
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
286772
0
14497
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the best shock wave therapy protocol for a widely used treatment for calcific soft tissue conditions in musculoskeletal medicine. We would like to see whether the addition of ultrasound to shock wave therapy in treatment of calcific soft tissue pathologies improves patient outcome as determined by decrease in pain, improvement of function and decrease in size of the calcification. We believe that treatment outcome may be similar between groups. However it is possible that for superficial conditions patient guided protocols may be slightly superior. In deep structures such as the shoulder tendon the addition of ultrasound to target the exact area of calcification may be slightly superior . This study will hopefully help answer these questions.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
33830
0
Query!
Address
33830
0
Query!
Country
33830
0
Query!
Phone
33830
0
Query!
Fax
33830
0
Query!
Email
33830
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
17077
0
Dr Masi Njawaya
Query!
Address
17077
0
The Sports Clinic at Sydney University
University of Sydney
Camperdown
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
17077
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
17077
0
+ 61 2 93518118
Query!
Fax
17077
0
+ 61 2 93518123
Query!
Email
17077
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8005
0
Dr Masi Njawaya
Query!
Address
8005
0
The Sports Clinic at Sydney University
Cnr University of Sydney
Camperdown
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
8005
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
8005
0
+61 2 93518118
Query!
Fax
8005
0
+61 2 93518123
Query!
Email
8005
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Ultrasound guidance does not improve the results of shock wave for plantar fasciitis or calcific achilles tendinopathy: A randomized control trial.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000430
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF