Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612000677808
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
20/06/2012
Date registered
25/06/2012
Date last updated
9/08/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Interactive training methods for the assessment and management of neck pain
Query!
Scientific title
Interactive virtual reality training with sensorimotor and kinematic exercises versus sensorimotor and kinematic exercise only, in management of patients with chronic neck pain- Evaluation of the effect on pain, disability, psychological factors, sensorimotor performance and cervical kinematics.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280704
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1131-9736
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic neck pain
286742
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
287043
287043
0
0
Query!
Physiotherapy
Query!
Musculoskeletal
287044
287044
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The two intervention groups will receive different exercise regimes:
Group 1. Sensorimotor and kinematic exercise including balance, repositioning, movement sense and oculomotor (eye movement) exercises. Each participant in group 1 will receive 2x 30 min session per week for 4 weeks. These exercise sessions will be supervised one-on-one by a physiotherapist. In addition participants will be required to complete a daily home exercise program consisting of the exercises taught during the sessions. The participants will be requested to perform their home exercises for 30 minutes, at least 4 times a week. Progression of exercise difficulty level and dossage will be updated every week according to the patient's progress. For example, balance may be challenged with unstable surfaces, single leg stances, number of repetitions and combination of a few tasks may be used in order to increase level of difficulty.
Group 2. Sensorimotor and kinematic exercise plus interactive exercises using the virtual reality system (VR glasses equipped with a tracker). Patients will interact with visual targets in a customised video game displayed in the VR glasses. This game will be controlled by head movement. Each participant in group 2 will receive 2 x 30 minute sessions per week for 4 weeks using the VR device. The VR exercise sessions will be supervised, one-on-one, by a physiotherapist. Patients will also be prescribed and progressed with home sensorimotor and kinematic exercises. Similarly to group 1, the participants in group 2 will be requested to perform their home exercises for 30 minutes, at least 4 times a week. Progression of exercise difficulty level and dossage will be updated every week according to the patient's progress. For example, balance may be challenged with unstable surfaces, single leg stances, number of repeatitions and combination of a few tasks may be used in order to increase level of difficulty.
The difference between the two groups is the use of the VR interactive system which will be included in the intervention of group 2 alone.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
285122
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This study compares two intervention groups. There is no control group.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
287376
0
Disability as assessed by the Neck Disability Index
Query!
Assessment method [1]
287376
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
287376
0
Baseline, at week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
287378
0
Cervical range of motion as assessed by the virtual reality system. The VR glasses are equipped with a tracker, including accelometers, gyropscopes and compass based sensors. Head motion data is collected during the assessment and analysed in customised software, resulting range of motion measures. Cervical range of motion will be assessed using the motion tracking sensors of the VR device. This has previously demonstrated reliability and repeatability for this measure.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
287378
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
287378
0
Baseline, at week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
287379
0
Cervical motion velocity and smoothness as assessed by the virtual reality system. The VR glasses are equipped with a tracker, including accelometers, gyropscopes and compass based sensors. Head motion data is collected during the interactive session using VR. The motion data collected is analysed in a customisedcustomised software and produces a velocity profile including multiple kinematic parameters such as velocity and smoothness of neck motion. Cervical motion, velocity and smoothness will be assessed using the motion tracking sensors of the VR device. This has previously demonstrated reliability and repeatability for this measure.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
287379
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
287379
0
Baseline, at week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
298032
0
Pain intensity as assessed by the visual analogue scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
298032
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
298032
0
Baseline, at week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
298033
0
Kinesiophobia as assessed by the TAMPA kinesiophobia scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
298033
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
298033
0
Baseline, at week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
298034
0
Cervical spine joint repositioning:Cervical joint position sense will be measured using the three-space Fastrak system (Polhemus, Navagation Science Division, Kaiser Aerospace Vermont). The Fastrak is a non-invasive electromagnetic device which tracks the positions of sensors in relation to a source in three-dimensions and has also been shown to demonstrate a good reliability and validity. Two sensors: one sensor placed on the forehead via attachment of a light weight headband, the second over the spinous process of C7, will continually record the positions of the head relative to a transmitter source during the entire test sequence. A software program written to format and process the data for three-dimensional analysis of the starting position (zero) and the position to which the head returned will be used. The difference between the starting (zero) and position on return to the starting position will be calculated in degrees for the return from head rotation from the right and left. In this test, the subject is instructed to focus on the natural resting head position for a few seconds, actively rotate the head away, and then try to return to the starting position as accurately as possible while vision is occluded.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
298034
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
298034
0
Baseline, at week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
298035
0
Balance will be measured using a computerised, stable force platform (40 X 60 centimetres) The ground reaction forces are registered by force transducers located in each corner of the plate to measure force changes over time in both the ML and AP directions. The signals will be recorded on a computer and the raw traces produced both numerically and graphically (Kistler 9286AA, North America). A total of 4, 30-second tests will be performed. These will include standing in comfortable stance with eyes open and eyes closed and then repeated while the subject is standing on a 10cm high-density piece of foam placed on the platform. In all tests, subjects will be asked to stand as steadily and quietly as possible with their arms by their sides for 30 seconds. A custom made Matlab program will calculate the total energy and RMS for each test.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
298035
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
298035
0
Baseline, at week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
298036
0
Patient satisfaction will be measured using a 10 point likert scale for 2 questions. 1. The amount of change on their neck pain/ symptoms since the treatment and 2. The overall satisfaction with the treatment.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
298036
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
298036
0
At week 5 from randomization, and at 3 & 6 months follow up
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Age: 18 years or more
2. Neck pain for more than 6 weeks
3. Mild to severe symptom severity, greater than 10% in the VAS and NDI.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Evidence for active vestibular complaints such as acute dizziness, imbalance, nystagmus, diplopia.
2. Medical conditions that may affect the cervical spine including Rheumatic disorders, Arthritis stage 3-4, Diabetes Mellitus, neurological disorders, traumatic head injuries, lower limb pathologies that restrict sitting, or any painful condition other than neck pain, at the time of the assessment.
3. Inability to communicate and provide informed consent. .
4. Inability to participate in exercise / rehabilitation program.
5. Unstable fracture / dislocation.
6. Post orthopedic surgery in the upper body or spine.
7. Female participants who are pregnant.
8. Any reason repeated movements of the neck would be contra-indicated.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
delete the sentence "by pulling a note out of a box."
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Patients will initially be stratified according to whether or not they have at least one deficit in sensorimotor values (greater than 2 sd of the mean value for control subjects for either joint position sense or balance). Subjects will either be labeled sensorimotor + or –ve. Block randomisation using a randomisation table generated by a computerised sequence will then be used for each subject according to the stratified group they are allocated to.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/07/2012
Query!
Actual
4/07/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
10/08/2012
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/01/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
40
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
285473
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
285473
0
University of Haifa
Query!
Address [1]
285473
0
Department of Physical Therapy
University of Haifa
Mt. Carmel
Haifa 31905
ISRAEL
Query!
Country [1]
285473
0
Israel
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Queensland
Query!
Address
CCRE Spine SHRS
University OF Queensland
St Lucia
QLD
4067
Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
284326
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
284326
0
Query!
Address [1]
284326
0
Query!
Country [1]
284326
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
276869
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
276869
0
University of Haifa, Department of Physical Therapy
Query!
Address [1]
276869
0
Department of Physical Therapy
University of Haifa
Mt. Carmel
Haifa 31905
ISRAEL
Query!
Country [1]
276869
0
Israel
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
287487
0
Human Ethics, Research Management Office, UQ Research and Innovation
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
287487
0
Human Ethics, Research Management Office UQ Research and Innovation Cumbrae-Stewart Building (#72) BRISBANE QLD 4072
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
287487
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
287487
0
24/05/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
287487
0
12/06/2012
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
287487
0
AMENDMENT (#H246)
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Exercise has been identified as an important element in the management of neck pain but it is not known which type is the most optimal. Virtual reality training might be of benefit. Various sensorimotor and kinematic impairments have been identified in patients with neck pain, and should be addressed in treatment. This research aims to investigate the effect of two types of exercise regimes on neck impairments. One regime will include balance, repositioning, eye and kinematic exercises tailored to the patients. The other exercise regime will include this as well as interactive VR training fascilitating cervical motor control and quick mobility in patients with neck pain.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Our paper describing this trial was accepted for publication in Manual therapy: Cervical kinematic training with and without interactive VR training for chronic neck pain–a randomized clinical trial HS Bahat, H Takasaki, X Chen, Y Bet-Or, J Treleaven Manual therapy 20 (1), 68-78
Query!
Public notes
We ended up doing 3 months follow up and then completed the study. We did not continue to 6 months follow up as originally reported due to the drop out rate.
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34339
0
Dr Julia TReleaven
Query!
Address
34339
0
CCRE Spine SHRS University OF Queensland St Lucia QLD 4067 Australia
Query!
Country
34339
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
34339
0
W: +61 07 33654568, Mob: +61 04 11773790
Query!
Fax
34339
0
Query!
Email
34339
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
17586
0
Dr. Julia Treleaven
Query!
Address
17586
0
CCRE Spine SHRS
University OF Queensland
St Lucia
QLD 4067
Australia
Query!
Country
17586
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
17586
0
W: +61 07 33654568, Mob: +61 04 11773790
Query!
Fax
17586
0
+61 07 33651877
Query!
Email
17586
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8514
0
Dr. Julia Treleaven
Query!
Address
8514
0
CCRE Spine SHRS
University OF Queensland
St Lucia
QLD 4067
Australia
Query!
Country
8514
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
8514
0
W: +61 07 33654568, Mob: +61 04 11773790
Query!
Fax
8514
0
+61 07 33651877
Query!
Email
8514
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF