Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612000718842
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
28/06/2012
Date registered
5/07/2012
Date last updated
18/05/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Feasibility of a computer training intervention for novice drivers with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or Autism Spectrum Disorder: pilot randomized controlled trial.
Query!
Scientific title
PC-based CD-ROM interactive training program entitled Drive Smart, to improve the Hazard Perception Skills of young drivers with either Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder or Autism Spectrum disorder. Pilot randomized controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280734
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1132-1182
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
286783
0
Query!
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
294540
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
287115
287115
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Mental Health
287148
287148
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Mental Health
294849
294849
0
0
Query!
Autistic spectrum disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Both the experimental group and the control will receive one module of a PC-based CD-ROM interactive training product entitled Drive Smart. This is made possible by introducing a second phase in which the control group will receive Drive Smart training as a delayed intervention immediately after receiving the control condition. Participants initially allocated to the control group will now receive Drive Smart training as a delayed intervention and will receive an additional assessment following training (4 assessment time points in total). Follow-up will be 6-weeks for all participants. All participants will be asked to complete one module of Drive Smart training (approximately 60 mins, completed on a single occasion). Drive Smart combines groups of exercises with scripted video sequences shot of every day driving scenes. The video sequences combine views through the front windscreen of a car, internal mirror and driver's side external door mirror. Multiple intervention concepts are embedded in the content of Drive Smart such as insight training (the process of increasing driver awareness of skill limitations) and commentary driving. Commentary driving is a technique used in police driver training where the driver gives a running verbal commentary. The commentary combines information about what the driver can see, is thinking and what they are planning to do.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
285179
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [2]
285204
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control group will view a documentary video about the history of the motor car. Running time approximately 60 minutes.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
287439
0
The primary outcome of this study will be improved hazard perception response time of participants as measured by a computer-based Hazard Perception Test (HPT) (Marrington, Horswill, & Wood, 2008; Smith, Horswill, Chambers, & Wetton, 2009; Wetton, Hill, & Horswill, 2011). The test involves participants watching a short instructional video followed by a selection of short authentic traffic video clips. The clips depict potential hazards such as pedestrians stepping out into the roadway and are filmed from a real car driver's perspective. Selected clips will be randomly assigned to each HPT. The back end of the test is coded to measure hazard response latency by recording the location and timing of mouse clicks and converting earliest responses to potential traffic conflicts into a reaction time score. The final score is the mean latency score across all test items. Evaluation of The HPT's psychometric properties demonstrates good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient reported of 0.93 (Wetton, et al., 2011).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
287439
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
287439
0
Experimental group (group A) time points: 0 (baseline), 1 (2 hours), 2 (6 weeks).
Control group (group B) time points: 0 (baseline), 1 (2 hours), 3 (3 hours), 4 (6 weeks).
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
298149
0
Risk perception will be assessed using a computer based test entitled Occupational Therapy Risk Perception Test (OT-RiPT). Participants will be assessed individually in a quiet room. Participants are asked to sit in front of a computer screen and watch a video recorded from a driver’s perspective of real driving. The view is of the road ahead. Participants will be asked to evaluate how risky they think the situation is using a visual analogue scale. The test takes approximately15 minutes to complete.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
298149
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
298149
0
Experimental group (group A) time points: 0 (baseline), 1 (2 hours), 2 (6 weeks).
Control group (group B) time points: 0 (baseline), 1 (2 hours), 3 (3 hours), 4 (6 weeks).
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
298150
0
Brake reaction time will be tested using the RT-2S Simple Reaction Time Tester (Advanced Therapy Products Inc, 2008). The RT-2S is comprised of a test light box, foot pedal module and operator control box. Subjects sit in front of the test light box and adjust their sitting position to achieve good access to the foot pedal module. Subjects are instructed to accelerate by pressing the accelerator pedal until the green light on the test light box is illuminated. The subject is instructed to press the brake pedal as soon as the red light comes on. The red light is randomly controlled from the operator control box. One practice test is given followed by 3 trials. The 3 trial scores are summed and the mean calculated.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
298150
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
298150
0
Experimental group (group A) time points: 0 (baseline), 1 (2 hours), 2 (6 weeks).
Control group (group B) time points: 0 (baseline), 1 (2 hours), 3 (3 hours), 4 (6 weeks).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Eligible participants will be English speaking and aged 16 to 25 years. Participants will be required to meet diagnostic criteria for ADHD or ASD and this will be confirmed by a doctor's letter. Participants will be required to have participated in some driver training. Participants are excluded if they have had previous experience using a computer based driver training program.
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
25
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Nil
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Randomization will be done using Excel at La Trobe University, Melbourne.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Participants will be randomised once consent has been obtained and all baseline measures have been collected. Randomisation is done in Excel. Allocations have been placed in sealed, opaque sequentially numbered envelopes.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/03/2014
Query!
Actual
20/08/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
11/11/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
25
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
5454
0
3086
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
5455
0
3085
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
5456
0
3088
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
5457
0
3094
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
5458
0
3095
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
5459
0
3072
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
5460
0
3073
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
5461
0
3071
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
5462
0
3075
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
9388
0
4558 - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
9389
0
2000 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
9390
0
3181 - Prahran
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
9391
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
285540
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
285540
0
La Trobe University
Query!
Address [1]
285540
0
Melbourne, Victoria 3086
Query!
Country [1]
285540
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Chris Bruce
Query!
Address
Occupational Therapy, Community & Clinical Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
284379
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
284379
0
Professor Leeanne Carey
Query!
Address [1]
284379
0
Occupational Therapy, Community & Clinical Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086
Query!
Country [1]
284379
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
287560
0
La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
287560
0
Research Services La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria 3086
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
287560
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
287560
0
09/07/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
287560
0
03/12/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
287560
0
12-092 mod 1
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
There is good quality evidence that a link exists between negative driving outcomes and ADHD, yet reducing crash and traffic infringement risk for this group of drivers remains problematic. The pilot study aims are to: 1) Determine the magnitude of the between-group and within-subject change in hazard perception skills, reaction time and risk-taking propensity in young drivers with ADHD or ASD exposed to Drive Smart training. 2) Determine if any between-group or within-subject change in hazard perception, risk-taking propensity or reaction time is maintained over time. 3) Estimate the variance of the primary outcome variable to enable sample size calculation. 4) Determine the rate of recruitment and retention of participants in order to establish if a full-scale evaluation of Drive Smart is feasible. Young drivers aged between 16 and 25 years will be randomised to an intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group will receive a computer training session using a PC-based CD-ROM interactive training program. A second phase is included, in which the control group will receive Drive Smart training as a delayed intervention. This is intended to maximise resources and data collection within the reduced number of participants recruited. This will facilitate investigation of the potential benefits of Drive Smart training beyond the current exposure with participants acting as their own control. An additional benefit of including a second phase is that all participants receive the intervention. This research will contribute to the evidence-base regarding the efficacy of interventions for improving the hazard perception skills of young novice drivers.
Query!
Trial website
https://drivingsafeblog.wordpress.com/
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34363
0
Prof Leeanne Carey
Query!
Address
34363
0
Occupational Therapy, Community & Clinical Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086
Query!
Country
34363
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
34363
0
61 3 94795600
Query!
Fax
34363
0
Query!
Email
34363
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
17610
0
Chris Bruce
Query!
Address
17610
0
Occupational Therapy, Community & Clinical Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086
Query!
Country
17610
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
17610
0
61 3 94795699
Query!
Fax
17610
0
61 3 94795737
Query!
Email
17610
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8538
0
Chris Bruce
Query!
Address
8538
0
Occupational Therapy, Community & Clinical Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086
Query!
Country
8538
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
8538
0
61 3 94795699
Query!
Fax
8538
0
61 3 94795737
Query!
Email
8538
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF