Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612000776808
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
20/07/2012
Date registered
23/07/2012
Date last updated
21/06/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Bisphosphonate Therapy with Zoledronic acid or Tenofovir Switching to Improve Low Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Adults: a Strategic, Randomised Trial
Query!
Scientific title
Bisphosphonate Therapy with Zoledronic acid or Tenofovir Switching to Improve Low Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Adults: a Strategic, Randomised Trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280883
0
N/A
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-11328470
Query!
Trial acronym
ZeST
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
HIV
286952
0
Query!
osteopenia
286953
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
287290
287290
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Musculoskeletal
287291
287291
0
0
Query!
Osteoporosis
Query!
Infection
287296
287296
0
0
Query!
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS / HIV)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants currently taking tenofovir as part of their stable HIV therapy, have no detectable HIV in the blood, have thin bones, and who could safely use either zoledronic acid or switch their tenofovir to another anti-HIV drug will be randmolmly assigned to either:
1. zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenous (IV) yearly (2 doses) OR
2. switch from tenofovir to another potent anti-HIV drug (without commencing zoledronic acid) selected by the study doctor at the first study visit.
Switch ARV: Dose amounts and frequency will depend on switch ARV selected by the study doctor, however at least daily. Mode of administration is oral for duration of the study (2 years).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
285315
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
switch from tenofovir to another potent antiretroviral (ARV)drug (without commencing a bisphosphonate)
Dose amounts and frequency will depend on switch ARV selected by the study doctor, mode of administration is oral.
The switch options include abacavir, raltegravir or a boosted protease inhibitor. A switch option will be chosen based on previous treatment exposure and side effects.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
287565
0
the effects of zoledronic acid 5 mg IV yearly to switching from tenofovir to another antiretroviral drug on lumbar spine BMD measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DEXA] scanning
Query!
Assessment method [1]
287565
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
287565
0
2 years
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
287566
0
the effects of zoledronic acid 5 mg IV yearly to switching from tenofovir to another antiretroviral drug on hip BMD measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DEXA] scanning
Query!
Assessment method [2]
287566
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
287566
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
298411
0
To compare the randomised groups for mean percent change in hip BMD measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DEXA] scanning
Query!
Assessment method [1]
298411
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
298411
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
298412
0
To compare the randomised groups for incidence of osteoporosis (T-score <-2.5 at hip or spine) and of normal BMD (T-score >-1 at hip and spine) measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DEXA] scanning
Query!
Assessment method [2]
298412
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
298412
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
298413
0
To compare the randomised groups for fracture risk estimated with the Australian version of the FRAX equation
Query!
Assessment method [3]
298413
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
298413
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
298414
0
To compare the randomised groups for blood serum levels of C-Terminal telopeptide (CTx) and Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
298414
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
298414
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
298415
0
To compare the randomised groups for fractures (except of the skull, and of the small bones of the hands and feet) by clinical assessment
Query!
Assessment method [5]
298415
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
298415
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
298416
0
To compare the randomised groups for clinical adverse events; all serious adverse events; AIDS; death; use of concomitant medications for toxicity; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, by MDRD equation; laboratory adverse events; virological failure by pathology tests and clinical assessment
Query!
Assessment method [6]
298416
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
298416
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
298417
0
To compare the randomised groups for modifications to ART (after baseline) by clinical assessment
Query!
Assessment method [7]
298417
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
298417
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
342387
0
Changes in BMD over 36 months
Query!
Assessment method [8]
342387
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
342387
0
36 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. provision of written, informed consent
2. HIV infected adult equal to or greater than 18 years of age
3. stable and well-tolerated ART including tenofovir for the preceding 6 months
4. plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/ml for at least the preceding 3 months
5. eGFR >60ml/min (patients at higher risk of zoledronic acid/tenofovir nephrotoxicity)
6. spine or neck of femur T score = -1.0 measured by DXA (i.e. osteopenia)
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. prior bisphosphonate therapy
2. use of tenofovir for previously active chronic hepatitis B co-infection
3. requiring therapy for low BMD (e.g. prior fragility fracture; other metabolic bone disease)
4. other secondary causes of osteoporosis: hypogonadism (low total testosterone/oestrogen and luteinizing hormone >25% above upper normal limit); hypothyroidism (low T4 and elevated TSH); hyperparathyroidism (elevated parathyroid hormone); inhaled fluticasone in a patient receiving ritonavir; prednisolone equal to or greater than 7.5mg/d or equivalent
5. contra-indications to zoledronic acid (known hypersensitivity to bisphosphonates, hypocalcaemia, prior or current uveitis, eGFR<35 mL/min)
6. recent (within the last 2 months) or planned dental surgery (at investigators discretion)
7. previous virological failure, genotypic resistance, intolerance or contraindication to proposed switch antiretroviral drug
8. HLA-B*5701 positive (abacavir contra-indicated) or prior ischaemic cardiovascular disease if planning to switch from tenofovir to abacavir
9. concurrent use of any nephrotoxic drug
10. breast-feeding or pregnancy
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Eligible patients are allocated to intervention by central randomisation. A randomisation CRF and the screening DXA report is faxed to the central randomisation officer who has a medical doctor review the DXA to determine stratification.
Patients are stratified according to DXA site and severity of osteopenia. The randomisation officer will refer to the appropriate electronic stratum worksheet (1 worksheet per stratum) as instructed by the medical doctor and assign, in sequential order (from top to bottom) the next available randomised intervention.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Within each stratum, randomisation blocks were created.
An on-line number generator (http://graphpad.com/quickcalcs/RandMenu.cfm) was used to assign participants to one of two interventions (A or B) by a random order. This was repeated for each stratum.
Intervention A was designated as the ‘commence zoledronic acid treatment and continue tenofovir-containing ART’ arm, and B designated as the ‘switch from tenofovir to another potent antiretroviral drug’ arm.
The blocks will allow for even distribution of participants in each of the two arms within the 6 strata as the proportions within each stratum is unknown.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
24/07/2012
Query!
Actual
24/07/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/01/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
6/04/2018
Query!
Actual
26/03/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
84
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
85
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
9521
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [1]
9521
0
Barcelona
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
285675
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
285675
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
285675
0
Level 1
16 Marcus Clarke Street
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
285675
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
St Vincents Hospital
Query!
Address
390 Victoria St
Darlinghurst
NSW 2010
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
284504
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
284504
0
Query!
Address [1]
284504
0
Query!
Country [1]
284504
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
276955
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
276955
0
Professor Jennifer Hoy
Query!
Address [1]
276955
0
Infectious Diseases Unit
Level 2, Burnet Institute
The Alfred Hospital
85 Commercial Road
Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country [1]
276955
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
276956
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
276956
0
Professor Peter Ebeling
Query!
Address [2]
276956
0
Department of Medicine/ School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health
Monash University
Level 5 / Block E,
Monash Medical Centre,
246 Clayton Road,
Clayton, VIC 3168
Australia
Query!
Country [2]
276956
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
276957
0
Individual
Query!
Name [3]
276957
0
Professor Nicholas Pocock
Query!
Address [3]
276957
0
St Vincent's Clinic Nuclear Medicine, Level 5
438 Victoria St
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Country [3]
276957
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
287662
0
St Vincents Hospital Sydney
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
287662
0
St Vincent's Hospital Delacy 15 Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
287662
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
287662
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
287662
0
31/01/2012
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
287662
0
HREC/11/SVH/201
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to find out whether treatment with zoledronic acid or switching from tenofovir to another anti-HIV drug is more effective for improving low bone density over 24 months. These two options can improve low BMD in patients receiving tenofovir, but it is not yet known which one is the best as both strategies have their own advantages and disadvantages. Current evidence suggests that zoledronic acid may be better in terms of increasing bone density but it is not known for sure, hence the purpose of this study.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34463
0
Prof Andrew Carr
Query!
Address
34463
0
St Vincents Hospital
Xavier, Level 4
390 Victoria St
Darlinghurst
NSW 2010
Query!
Country
34463
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
34463
0
+61 2 83823359
Query!
Fax
34463
0
Query!
Email
34463
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
17710
0
Robyn Richardson
Query!
Address
17710
0
Clinical Research Program
C/- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Unit (IBAC)
Level 4, Xavier Building
St Vincent’s Hospital
390 Victoria Street
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Country
17710
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
17710
0
+61 2 8382 3872
Query!
Fax
17710
0
+61 2 8382 3869
Query!
Email
17710
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8638
0
Professor Andrew Carr
Query!
Address
8638
0
Clinical Research Program
C/- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Unit (IBAC)
Level 4, Xavier Building
St Vincent’s Hospital
390 Victoria Street
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Country
8638
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
8638
0
+61 2 8382 3359
Query!
Fax
8638
0
+61 2 8382 3893
Query!
Email
8638
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Zoledronic acid is superior to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-switching for low bone mineral density in adults with HIV.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001911
Embase
Prolonged Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Mineral Density and Turnover in HIV-Infected Adults on Tenofovir: A Randomized, Open-Label Study.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3834
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF