Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612001109897
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/10/2012
Date registered
17/10/2012
Date last updated
17/10/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A clinical trial to compare the outcome of two different repair techniques in patients with flexor tendon injuries in their hand
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of outcome of 1- and 2-knot, 4-strand, double-modified Kessler flexor tendon repair with early active mobilization protocol in patients with flexor tendon lacerations of hand
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
281381
0
NIL
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1135-7623
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Flexor tendon injuries of the hand.
287610
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents
287942
287942
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Musculoskeletal
287956
287956
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Surgery
287957
287957
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
It is comparison of two different surgical techniques for flexor tendon repair. 1knot technique(Group A) or 2 knot technique(Group B) with approximate duration of 60-120 min in both techniques. Early active mobilization of affected digits will be started from 1st postoperative day in both groups.Patients will follow this rehabilitation protocol for 8 weeks ,with change of exercises will be told to patients on followups.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
285854
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Group A patients will have 1 knot for flexor tendon repair while group B patients will have 2 knots.Group A can be described as control treatment.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288150
0
1-knot flexor tendon repair is stronger than 2-knot repair in term of total active motion
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288150
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288150
0
Total active motion 3, 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and a final assessment performed at 12 weeks postoperatively.Total active motion will assessed with by goniometry.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
299511
0
Tendon rupture
Query!
Assessment method [1]
299511
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
299511
0
At 3, 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and a final assessment performed at 12 weeks postoperatively by clinical examination .In suspicious cases Ultrasonic exam will be done.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Age 5 to 70 years
Gender both males and females
Flexor tendon lacerations of hand (on clinical examination)
Query!
Minimum age
5
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Associated extensor tendon lacerations of hand (on clinical examination)
Associated fractures of hand (on X rays of affected hand)
Replantation and revascularization cases of hands (on clinical examination)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
allocation involved contacting the holder of the allocation schedule who was "off-site"
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomization using lottery method
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/10/2012
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
4595
0
Pakistan
Query!
State/province [1]
4595
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286133
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
286133
0
Query!
Address [1]
286133
0
Query!
Country [1]
286133
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Muhammad Saleem
Query!
Address
Department of Plastic Surgery, Allama Iqbal Medical College,
Allama Shabbir Ahmed Usmani Road,
Lahore 54550
Query!
Country
Pakistan
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
284944
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
284944
0
Query!
Address [1]
284944
0
Query!
Country [1]
284944
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288180
0
Ethical Review Board, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Jinnah Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288180
0
Prof. Arif M. Siddiqui Chairman Ethical Review Board, Medica Unit 3 Allama Iqbal Medical College, Jinnah Hospital Allama Shabbir Ahmed Usmani Road, Lahore 54550
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288180
0
Pakistan
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288180
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
288180
0
30/12/2011
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288180
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The objective of the study is to compare the outcome of flexor tendon repair techniques in term of total active motion between two groups. Flexor tendon repair will be done by consultant using 4 strands of double modified Kessler grasping core suture 4-0 polypropylene suture material with 1 knot(Group A) or 2 knot (Group B) placed between tendon ends. Both groups will undergo early active mobilization protocol starting from first post operative day. All patients will be clinically assessed in term of total active motion 3, 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and a final assessment performed at 12 weeks postoperatively by the researcher and data will be entered in the proforma.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34819
0
Query!
Address
34819
0
Query!
Country
34819
0
Query!
Phone
34819
0
Query!
Fax
34819
0
Query!
Email
34819
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
18066
0
Muhammad Saleem
Query!
Address
18066
0
Department of Plastic Surgery
Allama Iqbal Medical College/ Jinnah Hospital
Allama Shabbir Ahmed Usmani Road,
Lahore 54550
Query!
Country
18066
0
Pakistan
Query!
Phone
18066
0
+923445203650
Query!
Fax
18066
0
Query!
Email
18066
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8994
0
Muhammad Saleem
Query!
Address
8994
0
Department of Plastic Surgery
Allama Iqbal Medical College/ Jinnah Hospital
Allama Shabbir Ahmed Usmani Road,
Lahore 54550
Query!
Country
8994
0
Pakistan
Query!
Phone
8994
0
+923445203650
Query!
Fax
8994
0
Query!
Email
8994
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF