Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613001295730
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
30/10/2012
Date registered
21/11/2013
Date last updated
25/11/2013
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The importance of technique of reperfusion in liver transplantation
Query!
Scientific title
The importance of the technique of reperfusion in liver transplantation: regulation of hepatic microcirculation and the pathophysiological role of endothelin-1 and stress inducible vasoactive mediators
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
281473
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1136-5219
Query!
Trial acronym
MERP-TRANSPLANT
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Patient undergoing liver Transplant
287731
0
Query!
Reperfusion technique in liver transplantation
287829
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
288073
288073
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
288176
288176
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The patients are randomised in two groups, simultaneous arterial and portal revascularization (SR group) and Initial
portal reperfusion (IPR).
In the IPR group the graft is revascularized through the portal vein, and the hepatic artery is subsequently performed. In the SR group the graft is
revascularized simultaneously through the portal vein, and hepatic artery. Both techniques are used in the clinical practice, it is based on the personal
preference of the surgeon. There is no evidence that one technique of reperfusion is superior to another or harmful. However, there is a theoretical advantage
to the simultaneous technique.
A non-invasive device (called Sidestream Dark Field imaging), that allow for clinical observation of the microcirculation will be used 30 minutes after reperfusion.
It is hand-held probe with a sterile extension for direct contact with target tissue. The objective of the device can be sterilized with a sterile cover and drape.
Sidestream Dark Field imaging uses the absorption of hemoglobin to visualize the microcirculation using a polarized light technique, as consequence it is
completely safe. Sidestream Dark Field imaging is used at the end of reperfusion for 5 minutes
Blood sample for the serum assessment of ET-1 and other markers will be taken at indiction of anaesthesia amd post operative day 1-3-5-7.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
285976
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The patients are randomised in two groups, simultaneous arterial and portal revascularization (SR group) and Initial
portal reperfusion (IPR) which will be deemed as the control group.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288277
0
To verify the optimal technique of reperfusion in liver transplantation.
Liver functional test, endothelia-1
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288277
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288277
0
liver functional test at Post operative day-1,3,-5,7.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
299742
0
Mortality, prospectve data collection using custom made forms,
Query!
Assessment method [1]
299742
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
299742
0
90 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
300000
0
graft failure (defined as need for re-transplantation or patient death secondary to liver failure).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
300000
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
300000
0
7 days
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
patient candidate to Liver transplant at Royal prince alfred hospital older than 18 years
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Split liver
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The patients are randomised in two groups, simultaneous arterial and portal revascularization (SR group) and Initial
portal reperfusion (IPR). Central randomization by computer software will be used.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation by using a randomisation table created by computer software. Patients stratified according the kind of donor used, Donor afer cardiac death versus brain dead donor
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/12/2013
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286237
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
286237
0
Australian national liver transplantation unit, Royal prince alfred hospital
Query!
Address [1]
286237
0
missenden road
Camperdown NSW, 2050
Query!
Country [1]
286237
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Australian national liver transplantation unit Royal prince alfred hospital
Query!
Address
missenden road
Camperdown NSW, 2050
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
285044
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
285044
0
Query!
Address [1]
285044
0
Query!
Country [1]
285044
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288317
0
Ethic review committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288317
0
Royal prince alfred Hospital Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288317
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288317
0
31/10/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
288317
0
20/03/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288317
0
hrec/12/rpah/528
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Fifty patients undergoing liver transplant will be included in the study. The participants will be randomized in two groups using a software application. In SR group, simultaneous portal vein and hepatic artery reperfusion, while in IPR group an initial portal reperfusion and the hepatic artery reperfusion is subsequently performed. Both techniques are used in the clinical practice, it is based on the personal preference of the surgeon the type of perfusion technique used. There is no evidence that one technique of reperfusion is superior to another or harmful.Data regarding preoperative variables, intraoperative and postoperative variables are prospectively collected. A non-invasive device (called Sidestream Dark Field imaging), that allow for clinical observation of the microcirculation will be used. It is hand-held probe with a sterile extension for direct contact with liver parenchyma. Liver biopsies are performed to assess Immunohystochemical intensity of ET-1 and other markers. The tissue to be acquired in this study will be obtained from surgical specimens taken from consented participants having routine hepatic surgery or liver transplantation. The study additionally requires the provision of a blood sample for the serum assessment of ET-1 and other markers. This blood sample will be taken at the time of clinically indicated vensection. The risks involved in drawing blood from the arm include discomfort at the site of insertion of the needle and possible bruising/swelling around the injection site. There is a very rare risk of infection. There is also a remote possibility of fainting while blood is being drawn.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34895
0
Dr Carlo Pulitano
Query!
Address
34895
0
Royal prince alfred hospital
Missenden road
transplant unit
Camperdown 2050, NSW
Query!
Country
34895
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
34895
0
0458003482
Query!
Fax
34895
0
Query!
Email
34895
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
18142
0
Carlo Pulitano
Query!
Address
18142
0
royal prince alfred hospital
Missenden road
transplant unit
Camperdown 2050, NSW
Query!
Country
18142
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
18142
0
+61 458 003 482
Query!
Fax
18142
0
Query!
Email
18142
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
9070
0
Carlo Pulitano
Query!
Address
9070
0
royal prince alfred hospital
Missenden road
transplant unit
Camperdown 2050, NSW
Query!
Country
9070
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
9070
0
+61 458 003 482
Query!
Fax
9070
0
Query!
Email
9070
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF