Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000279729
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
6/03/2013
Date registered
8/03/2013
Date last updated
26/02/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
TROG 12.01 A Randomised Trial of Weekly Cetuximab and Radiation versus Weekly Cisplatin and Radiation in Good Prognosis Locoregionally Advanced HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Query!
Scientific title
TROG 12.01 A Randomised Trial of Weekly Cetuximab and Radiation versus Weekly Cisplatin and Radiation in Good Prognosis Locoregionally Advanced HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
281562
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
HPV Oropharynx
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
HPV positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OPSCC)
287845
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
288193
288193
0
0
Query!
Head and neck
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Radiation Treatment: 70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks.
Systemic Treatment: Weekly Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose IV prior to radiation, followed by weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2 for the duration of the radiotherapy)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
286083
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
286305
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Radiation Treatment: 70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks.
Systemic Treatment: Weekly Cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV for the duration of the radiotherapy)
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288392
0
To compare the area under curve of symptom severity between weekly cisplatin and RT versus weekly cetuximab and RT from baseline to week 20 (13 weeks post-completion of radiotherapy) as measured by M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288392
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288392
0
MDASI-HN; baseline, treatment weeks 1-7, 1, 3, 5, 9 and 13 weeks post treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
300022
0
To compare other MDASI-HN endpoints: Symptom Interference Score, Modified MDASI-HN Symptom Score, MDASI-HN Symptom Clusters and individual item scores at individual time points.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300022
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300022
0
baseline, treatment weeks 1-7, post radiation weeks 1, 3, 5, 9 and 13 as well as 6mths, 12mths and 24mths post treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
300023
0
To compare health-related quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Head and Neck (FACT-HN)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
300023
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
300023
0
Baseline, post RT 9wks, 6mths, 12mths, 24mths and 36mths.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
300024
0
To compare speech and dietary function as measured by the Performance Status Scale for Head & Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-HN)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
300024
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
300024
0
baseline, post RT 13wks, 6mths, 12mths, 24mths and 36mths.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
300025
0
To compare clinician-assessed acute and late toxicity using toxicity grading (CTCAE v4.0) reported as worst toxicity and as overall acute toxicity burden (T-score).
Query!
Assessment method [4]
300025
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
300025
0
Each visit (baseline to 60 months post radiation)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
300026
0
To compare unacceptable locoregional treatment outcome (ULTO) defined as either locoregional failure or specific severe late treatment-related locoregional toxicities.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
300026
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
300026
0
Clinical Examinations; each visit baseline to 60 months post treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
300027
0
To compare rate of enteral feeding at 12months from end of RT.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
300027
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
300027
0
12mnths post RT.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
300028
0
To compare functional swallowing outcome measured by swallowing video fluoroscopy.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
300028
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
300028
0
Baseline, 12mths and 24mths post RT.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
300029
0
To compare hearing impairment as measured by audiometry
Query!
Assessment method [8]
300029
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
300029
0
baseline and 12months post RT.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
300030
0
To compare hearing impact on health related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by total score of Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adult Screenign version (HHIA-S)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
300030
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
300030
0
baseline, treatment wk7 and post RT 1 wk, 13 wks, 6mths, 12mths and 24mths.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
300031
0
To compare depression and anxiety, as measured by depression and anxiety scales of HADS.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
300031
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
300031
0
Baseline, treatment wk 7 and post RT 1wk, 5wks, 13wks, 6mths, 12mths and 24mths.
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
300032
0
To compare overall survival, defined as time from randomisation to death.
Query!
Assessment method [11]
300032
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
300032
0
Clinical Examinations; each visit baseline to 60 months post treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
300033
0
To compare failure-free survival, defined as time from randomisation to failure (locoregional or distant) or death.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
300033
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
300033
0
Clinical Examinations; each visit baseline to 60 months post treatment.
Radiological examinations; baseline and post RT 13 wks, 6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths, 36mths and any time of clinically indicated.
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
300034
0
To compare time to locoregional failure defined as time from randomisation to locoregional failure.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
300034
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
300034
0
Clinical Examinations; each visit baseline to 60 months post treatment.
Radiological examinations; baseline and post RT 13 wks, 6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths, 36mths and any time of clinically indicated.
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
300035
0
To compare FDG-PET or FDG-PET-CT complete response rate at 13 weeks post RT.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
300035
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
300035
0
Baseline and 13 weeks post-completion Raditaiton therapy
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
300036
0
To compare the pattern of disease failure (locoregional [recurrence at primary tumour site and/or regional nodes], distant, both).
Query!
Assessment method [15]
300036
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
300036
0
Radiological examinations; baseline and post RT 13 wks, 6mths, 12mths, 24mths, 36mths and any time of clinically indicated.
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
300037
0
To compare quality adjusted life years (QALYS) using the EQ-5D-5L.
Query!
Assessment method [16]
300037
0
Query!
Timepoint [16]
300037
0
Baseline and post treatment (13 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24months and 36 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
300102
0
To compare work status and time to return to work questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [17]
300102
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
300102
0
Baseline, treatment wk7 and post RT 1wk, 13wks, 6mths, 12mths, 24mths and 36mnths.
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
301470
0
To compare cost of health resource utilisation by
comparing the cost of administrating each arm in addtion to the treatment of toxcicites (e.g. need for feed tube insertion, hopsitalisations, salvage surgery, supportive care medicines)
Query!
Assessment method [18]
301470
0
Query!
Timepoint [18]
301470
0
End of Study
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Aged 18 years or older
2. Has provided written Informed Consent for participation in this trial
3. Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx with p16 positive status confirmed locally by immunohistochemistry
4. Stage III (excluding T1-2N1) or stage IV (excluding T4, N3, and distant metastasis) if smoking history of < /=10 pack years. If > 10 pack years nodal disease must be N0 – N2a.
5. If an excisional biopsy has been performed, patients remain eligible for the study provided there is clinically measurable disease prior to commencing RT. The residual disease should still meet the stage criteria required for the trial e.g. excisional biopsy of a node with residual T3 primary, or tonsillectomy for T1 primary with residual > N2a nodes.
6. No prior treatment for oropharyngeal cancer
7. Adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function as defined by,
a) Absolute neutrophil count (ANC, segs + bands) > /= 1.5 x 109/L
b) Platelet count > /= 100 x 109/L
c) Total bilirubin < /= 1.5 x upper normal limit
d) ALT < /= 2.5 x upper normal limit
e) Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) or isotopic GFR > 55ml/min
8. ECOG performance status score of 0-1
9. Participants capable of childbearing are using adequate contraception and intend to continue use of contraception for at least 6 months following completion of treatment
10. Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to randomisation of women who are of childbearing potential
11. Suitable for follow-up for at least 24 months as per trial protocol.
12. Sufficient proficiency in English, cognitive capacity and willingness to complete questionnaires
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. History of unknown primary of the head and neck
2. T4, N3 or distant metastases
3. Smoking history >10 pack years with N2b or c nodal status
4. Women who are pregnant or lactating.
5. Previous radiotherapy to the area to be treated (excluding superficial radiotherapy for a cutaneous malignancy)
6. Previous cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy
7. Prior EGFR targeted therapy of any kind
8. Primary surgery to the affected area (excisional biopsy allowed)
9. Peripheral neuropathy > /= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0)
10. Sensori-neural hearing impairment >= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0, hearing impaired, not enrolled on a monitoring program) which may be exacerbated by cisplatin (Audiometric abnormalities without corresponding clinical deafness will not be grounds for exclusion)
11. Tinnitus > /= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0)
12. History of interstitial lung disease or evidence of interstitial lung disease on pre-registration CT
13. History of myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to study entry, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, unstable angina, active cardiomyopathy, unstable arrhythmia, uncontrolled psychotic disorders, active serious infections, active peptic ulcer disease, immunosuppression due to post-organ transplantation or use of immunosuppressants for autoimmune disorders
14. Patients known to be HIV positive
15. Other cancer that was diagnosed:
a) more than 5 years prior to current diagnosis with (i) subsequent evidence of disease recurrence or (ii) clinical expectation of recurrence is greater than 10% or
b) within 5 years of the current diagnosis, with the exception of successfully treated basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma, in situ melanoma, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/05/2013
Query!
Actual
17/06/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/06/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
200
Query!
Accrual to date
169
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,SA,WA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
697
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
698
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
699
0
Calvary Mater Newcastle - Waratah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
700
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
2770
0
The Canberra Hospital - Garran
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
2771
0
Liverpool Hospital - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
2772
0
Riverina Cancer Care Centre - Wagga Wagga
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
2773
0
The Chris O’Brien Lifehouse - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
2774
0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
2775
0
The Townsville Hospital - Douglas
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
3469
0
St George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [12]
3470
0
Flinders Medical Centre - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [13]
3471
0
Austin Health - Austin Hospital - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [14]
3472
0
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment hospital [15]
5116
0
Gold Coast Hospital - Southport
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
4687
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
4687
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [2]
7078
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [2]
7078
0
Palmerston North
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286369
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
286369
0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Query!
Address [1]
286369
0
Level 1
16 Marcus Clarke Street
Canberra
ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
286369
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
286860
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
286860
0
Merck Serono Australia
Query!
Address [2]
286860
0
Units 3-4, 25 Frenchs Forest Road East, Frenchs Forest, NSW, 2086
Query!
Country [2]
286860
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name
Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
Query!
Address
TROG Central Office
PO Box 88
Waratah NSW 2298
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
285148
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
285148
0
Query!
Address [1]
285148
0
Query!
Country [1]
285148
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288444
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288444
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Ethics Committee Peter MacCullum Cancer Centre Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett Street MELBOURNE VIC 8006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288444
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288444
0
08/02/2013
Query!
Approval date [1]
288444
0
28/03/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288444
0
HREC/13/PMCC/6
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study aims to compare radiation treatment combined with either cetuximab or cisplatin in patients with locoregionally advanced HPV positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) (located at the base of tongue or tonsil) Who is it for? You may be eligible to join this study if you are aged 18 years or more, and have been diagnosed with locoregionally advanced HPV positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). You should not have received any prior treatment for this cancer. Trial details; Participants in this trial will be randomly (by chance) allocated to one of two groups. Participants in one group will receive radiation treatment 5 days a week over 7 weeks, in conjunction with weekly doses of a drug called cetuximab. This drug is administered intravenously, i.e. directly into the vein. Participants in the other group will receive radiation treatment 5 days a week over 7 weeks in combination with the chemotherapy drug cisplatin, which is also administered intravenously. Participants will be assessed weekly during treatment, then at 1, 3, 5, 9, 13 weeks post-treatment and at months 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32, 36, 42, 48, 54, and 60 post-completion of treatment. Assessments will involve blood tests, questionnaires, clinical examination, hearing tests, swallowing tests, and radiological examination. The main research question being answered is whether those treated with weekly cetuximab and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy will experience less acute symptom severity than patients receiving weekly cisplatin and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.
Query!
Trial website
www.trog.com.au
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
nil
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34968
0
A/Prof Danny Rischin
Query!
Address
34968
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Locked Bag No 1,
A’Beckett St,
Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia.
Query!
Country
34968
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
34968
0
+61 3 9656 1408
Query!
Fax
34968
0
Query!
Email
34968
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
18215
0
Anetta Matera
Query!
Address
18215
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Locked Bag No 1,
A’Beckett St,
Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia.
Query!
Country
18215
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
18215
0
+61 3 9656 3661
Query!
Fax
18215
0
Query!
Email
18215
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
9143
0
Anetta Matera
Query!
Address
9143
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Locked Bag No 1,
A’Beckett St,
Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia.
Query!
Country
9143
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
9143
0
+61 3 9656 3661
Query!
Fax
9143
0
Query!
Email
9143
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
Current Study Results
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Update to Study Results
Doc. No.
Type
Is Peer Reviewed?
DOI
Citations or Other Details
Attachment
4388
Study results article
Yes
Young RJ, Solomon B, Corry J, Angel C, Kenny L, Po...
[
More Details
]
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF