Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000595718
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
21/05/2013
Date registered
27/05/2013
Date last updated
27/05/2013
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Query!
Scientific title
ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
282537
0
NIL
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1143-3140
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Pain following appendectomy in children
289204
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
289533
289533
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This study is a prospective,randomized comparison of 2 patient groups. One group of patients will receive an ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block at the end of the surgery using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with 1:200 000 epinephrine The total dose of bupivacaine will not exceed 2 mg/kg and the total volume will not be more than 20 ml.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
287203
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The second group will receive local anesthetic infiltration using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% by the surgeon at the end of surgery for a laparoscopic appendectomy.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
289629
0
Requirement for morphine post-surgery
Query!
Assessment method [1]
289629
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
289629
0
24 hours
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
302890
0
Assessment of pain scores post-surgery using Visual analogue scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
302890
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
302890
0
24 hours
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score 1-2
- Age :4 year to14years
-Weight less than or equal to 60 kg
-Presenting for laparoscopic appendectomy
Query!
Minimum age
4
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
14
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- ASA physical status > II
- Patients < 4 years of age
- Weight greater than 60 kg
- Co-morbid diseases (cardiac, pulmonary (not including asthma), neurological disease.
- children undergoing an additional surgical procedure at an anatomical location not covered by a unilateral TAP block during the same anesthetic
- children in whom a TAP block is contraindicated, i.e. surgical scar or distorted anatomy at the site of injection
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Children aged between 4and 14 years, ASA grade I to II, scheduled for appendectomy, in a randomized, blind,
controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated into 2 groups:
One group of patients will receive an ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with 1:200 000 epinephrine The total dose of bupivacaine will not exceed 2 mg/kg and the total volume will not be more than 20 ml.
. The second group will receive local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon at the end of surgery
. The allocation sequence will be generated by a random number table, and group allocation will be concealed in sealed, opaque envelopes, which will not opened until patient consent obtained.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
randomization will be done using a randomisation table created by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size was determined After post-hoc power analysis of the time to first analgesic, with power 0.95, effect size 2.3, and alpha equal to 0.05, 18 participants per group were required. This was rounded upwards to 20.
Data will be statistically described in terms of mean +-standard deviation , or frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. Data will be tested for normality using Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Comparison between the two study groups will bedone using Student t test for independent samples. p values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations will be done using computer programs SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 15 for Microsoft Windows
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2013
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/07/2013
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
5095
0
Egypt
Query!
State/province [1]
5095
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
287319
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
287319
0
Ahmad Ramzy Shaaban
Query!
Address [1]
287319
0
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and research center,Anesthesia department,MBC J22
Rawda street, pobox 40047.Jeddah 21499, Saudi Arabia
Query!
Country [1]
287319
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Ahmad Ramzy
Query!
Address
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and research center,Anesthesia department,MBC J22
Rawda street, pobox 40047.Jeddah 21499, Saudi Arabia
Query!
Country
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
286067
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
286067
0
Query!
Address [1]
286067
0
Query!
Country [1]
286067
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
289291
0
Ain Shams university, Faculty of medicine
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
289291
0
pobox 11566, Abbasya Square 11566, Cairo, Egypt
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
289291
0
Egypt
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
289291
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
289291
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
289291
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed
surgical procedures in children and is associated
with significant postoperative discomfort and
pain.Multimodal approaches to the provision of postoperative
analgesia often incorporate blockade of the abdominal
wall, such as ilioinguinal blockade or wound infiltration. However,
the efficacy of these approaches is unclear.
This study is a prospective,randomized comparison of 2 patient groups. One group of patients will receive an ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with 1:200 000 epinephrine The total dose of bupivacaine will not exceed 2 mg/kg and the total volume will not be more than 20 ml.
. The second group will receive local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon at the end of surgery for a laparoscopic appendectomy.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
40210
0
Dr AHMAD RAMZY SHAABAN
Query!
Address
40210
0
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and research center,Anesthesia department,MBC J22 Rawda street, pobox 40047.Jeddah 21499, Saudi Arabia.
Query!
Country
40210
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Phone
40210
0
+966534409797
Query!
Fax
40210
0
Query!
Email
40210
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
40211
0
Dr AHMAD RAMZY
Query!
Address
40211
0
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and research center,Anesthesia department,MBC J22 Rawda street, pobox 40047.Jeddah 21499, Saudi Arabia.
Query!
Country
40211
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Phone
40211
0
+966534409797
Query!
Fax
40211
0
Query!
Email
40211
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
40212
0
Dr Ahmad Ramzy
Query!
Address
40212
0
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and research center,Anesthesia department,MBC J22 Rawda street, pobox 40047.Jeddah 21499, Saudi Arabia.
Query!
Country
40212
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Phone
40212
0
+966534409797
Query!
Fax
40212
0
Query!
Email
40212
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
2014
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2014.06.005
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF