Trial Review

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12613001242718
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/11/2013
Date registered
12/11/2013
Date last updated
2/03/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
The clinical effectiveness of a simple new treatment for supine-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea
Scientific title
Does a supine-avoidance device achieve a similar reduction in sleepiness as usual CPAP treatment in patients with supine-predominant obstructive sleep apnoea?
Secondary ID [1] 283543 0
Nil
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Nil
Trial acronym
SUPA OSA Trial
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Supine-predominant obstructive sleep apnoea 290452 0
Condition category
Condition code
Respiratory 290843 290843 0 0
Sleep apnoea

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Supine Avoidance Device (BuzzPOD)
Patients will wear a BuzzPOD every night while they sleep for 8 weeks.
A BuzzPOD is a small (80mm x 40mm x 20mm) position monitoring device that is worn on the chest and discourages supine sleep by vibrating if the wearer remains on their back for longer than 5 seconds.
Adherence will be measured through a self-report sleep/wake diary and data downloaded from the BuzzPOD at 3 weeks and post-treatment (8 weeks).
There is a one week washout period between treatments; Treatment 2 will begin 7-14 days after completing Treatment 1.
Intervention code [1] 288234 0
Treatment: Devices
Comparator / control treatment
Standard treatment - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Machine
Patients will be asked to use a CPAP machine every night while they sleep for 8 weeks.
CPAP machine’s use a continuous level of positive airway pressure delivered through a mask to keep the airway open, thereby normalising breathing during sleep. The settings of each machine (including mask type etc.) will be individually adjusted to each patient.
Adherence measures will be downloaded from the machine at 3 weeks and post-treatment (8 weeks).
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 290841 0
Change in sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
Timepoint [1] 290841 0
Baseline, 3 weeks after the beginning of each treatment, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.
Secondary outcome [1] 305417 0
Reduction in Apnea-Hypopnea Index
Timepoint [1] 305417 0
Baseline, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.
Secondary outcome [2] 305418 0
Snoring (Snoring Scale Score)
Timepoint [2] 305418 0
Baseline, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.
Secondary outcome [3] 305419 0
Resting blood pressure assessed using an automatic sphygmomanometer
Timepoint [3] 305419 0
Baseline, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.
Secondary outcome [4] 305420 0
Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire)
Timepoint [4] 305420 0
Baseline, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.
Secondary outcome [5] 305421 0
Quality of life (Assessment of Quality of Life - 8D)
Timepoint [5] 305421 0
Baseline, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.
Secondary outcome [6] 305422 0
Treatment adherence - assessed by usage data downloaded from each device
Timepoint [6] 305422 0
Baseline, 3 weeks after the beginning of each treatment, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.
Secondary outcome [7] 305423 0
Patient and partner satisfaction with treatment - assessed using an investigator designed questionnaire containing eight Visual Analogue Scale questions
Timepoint [7] 305423 0
Baseline, 8 weeks after the beginning of each treatment.

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Age 18 to 75 years.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale score greater than or equal to 8.
No prior CPAP or BuzzPOD therapy.
Overnight diagnostic data indicating a diagnosis of supine-predominant obstructive sleep apnoea;
- Total AHI greater than 10 an hour
- Non-supine AHI less than 10 an hour
- Supine AHI greater than or equal to twice the non-supine AHI
- Total sleep greater than or equal to 4 hours
- Supine sleep time greater than or equal to 30 minutes
- Non-supine sleep time greater than or equal to 30 minutes
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
Potentially dangerous sleepiness requiring urgent treatment.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale score great than or equal to 16.
If participant is a commercial driver.
Co-morbidities that may preclude supine-avoidance treatment (e.g. arthritis, pacemaker).
Unwilling to cease current alternative OSA therapies for the duration of the trial.
Overnight diagnostic criteria indicating minimum blood oxygen saturation less than 80% for more than 10% of total sleep time.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
At each recruitment site (Repatriation General Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Flinders Medical Centre) a member of the sleep laboratory staff will review recent patient diagnostic sleep studies for patients who fit the study criteria for approach by their clinician at the patient’s next clinic appointment. The clinician will briefly describe the study and ask if the patient is willing to be contacted by research staff at the Adelaide Institute of Sleep Health for more information. If so, their contact details will be passed on to the Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health where the study researchers will provide more information on the study.
Patients who are still interested in study participation will attend an appointment with a study researcher at the Repatriation General Hospital. At this appointment the patients will be consented into the study and begin baseline measures following the successful completion of eligibility criteria.

Allocation to intervention will occur via a minimisation program, subsequent to consent and the collection of baseline measures, thereby ensuring allocation concealment.
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
A minimisation program (MinimPy), operated by the Repatriation General Hospital Pharmacy Department, will stratify treatment allocation (supine avoidance; CPAP) by ESS score, supine AHI, and gender.
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?


The people assessing the outcomes
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Other design features
Phase
Not Applicable
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis
All analyses will be conducted on an intention to treat basis, and the trial conducted according to CONSORT guidelines. Random effects modelling (using Stata’s xt commands) will be employed to analyse each outcome, clustering over individual within site to account for the possibility of a design effect. This approach uses all the available data, and is unaffected by data missing at random. For the primary outcome linear mixed effects models will be used to examine the change in sleepiness (ESS) over each treatment period.
Significance will be concluded if the confidence interval does not cross the non-inferiority margin. Diagnostic tests to examine homoscedasticity and normality of residuals will be carried out to ensure model validity. To assess treatment compliance between study arms, we will use multilevel mixed effects logistic regression. The change in snoring frequency will be assessed using multilevel mixed effect Poisson regression. Deviance residuals will be used to examine the goodness-of-fit of the logistic and Poisson models.
All calculations assume a type II error rate of 20%, that is, power of 80%. Available data suggest the change in ESS with CPAP treatment is around 4 (SD 4). We have powered to show non-inferiority. We consider expert clinicians in the field would agree that a difference <1.5 is unlikely to be of clinical importance, and we have used this non-inferiority margin previously. The null hypothesis is that the difference in mean ESS between supine-avoidance and CPAP treatment arms of the trial is >1.5 ESS units. Assuming the true difference between treatment arms is zero and a type I error rate of 2.5% (one-sided), a sample size of approximately 113 per group is required to reject the null hypothesis with a parallel groups design. Allowing for 20% attrition we originally selected 140 patients per group. The proportion of patients who use CPAP at least 4 h/night is ~50%. Assuming a type I error rate of 5% (two-sided) we have power to detect superior compliance if the proportion of those using the vibration device more than 4 h/night is = 67%.
However, given significantly lower than anticipated recruitment rates the original sample size of 280 patients has proven unachievable within remaining time and resources. To address this major problem we have redesigned the study as a cross-over trial. This should achieve equivalent study power with around half the original sample size (i.e. N=140 allowing for attrition), which we believe is achievable. Based on additional Statistician advice, we propose 2 additional strategies to maximise study power and potentially further reduce the sample size needed to address the main hypotheses. Firstly, replication of primary outcome measures (ESS) at 2 time points within each treatment arm will increase study power. Secondly, a blinded analysis at 12 months following cross-over trial commencement will be conducted to assess the within trial standard-deviation of the treatment change in ESS (without identifying treatment allocation). This will be used to re-power the study, anticipating that the sample size needed to address the primary hypothesis will be somewhat reduced. Simulations analyses suggest that replication of the primary outcome measures may reduce the sample size needed to address the primary outcome towards N=100.

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
25/11/2013
Actual
13/03/2014
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
28/02/2017
Actual
24/01/2017
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/07/2017
Actual
Sample size
Target
140
Accrual to date
Final
66
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Recruitment hospital [1] 1662 0
Repatriation Hospital - Daw Park
Recruitment hospital [2] 1664 0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woodville
Recruitment hospital [3] 1665 0
Flinders Medical Centre - Bedford Park
Recruitment hospital [4] 1666 0
The Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 7541 0
5041 - Daw Park
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 7542 0
5011 - Woodville
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 7543 0
5042 - Bedford Park
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 7544 0
5000 - Adelaide

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 288231 0
Government body
Name [1] 288231 0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Country [1] 288231 0
Australia
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Name
A/Prof Peter Catcheside
Address
Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health
Repatriation General Hospital
C-Block
Daws Road
Daws Park SA 5041
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 286950 0
Other
Name [1] 286950 0
Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health
Address [1] 286950 0
Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health
Repatriation General Hospital
C-Block
Daws Road
Daws Park SA 5041
Country [1] 286950 0
Australia

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 290136 0
Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee
Ethics committee address [1] 290136 0
Ethics committee country [1] 290136 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 290136 0
14/08/2013
Approval date [1] 290136 0
14/10/2013
Ethics approval number [1] 290136 0
431.13/HREC/13/SAC/274

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 44150 0
A/Prof Peter Catcheside
Address 44150 0
Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health
Repatriation General Hospital
C-Block
Daws Road
Daws Park SA 5041
Country 44150 0
Australia
Phone 44150 0
+61 8 8275 1309
Fax 44150 0
+61 8 82776890
Email 44150 0
[email protected]
Contact person for public queries
Name 44151 0
Amanda O'Grady
Address 44151 0
Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health
Repatriation General Hospital
C-Block
Daws Road
Daws Park SA 5041
Country 44151 0
Australia
Phone 44151 0
+61 8 8275 1301
Fax 44151 0
+61 8 82776890
Email 44151 0
amanda.o'[email protected]
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 44152 0
Peter Catcheside
Address 44152 0
Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health
Repatriation General Hospital
C-Block
Daws Road
Daws Park SA 5041
Country 44152 0
Australia
Phone 44152 0
+61 8 8275 1309
Fax 44152 0
+61 8 82776890
Email 44152 0
[email protected]

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
SourceTitleYear of PublicationDOI
EmbaseComparative Effectiveness of Supine Avoidance versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treating Supine-isolated Sleep Apnea: A Clinical Trial.2024https://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202309-753OC
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.