Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613001336774
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
4/12/2013
Date registered
6/12/2013
Date last updated
6/12/2013
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Foot Orthoses (FOs) on Pain, Quality of Life and Gait with Children Diagnosed with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA).
Query!
Scientific title
A single blinded randomised controlled trial, to investigate the clinical effectiveness of preformed semi-rigid foot orthoses, on pain, quality of life and the dynamics of gait of patients diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
283691
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
290656
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
291035
291035
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Children affected by JIA were diagnosed according to the 'International League of Associations for Rheumatology' (ILAR) criteria. Intervention was blinded to the patients. The trial group received pre-formed semi- rigid (Slimflex-plus) FOs, with the addition of customised chair side
corrections at the rear-foot, midfoot and/or forefoot; the control FOs supplied were instead made with leather board (1mm thick) only, without corrections and completely flat. Both FOs had the same black EVA top cover which clearly showed the dynamic impression patterns and allowed to monitor how compliant the children were. in addition, the parent/carer were asked to monitor that the child was wearing the FOs daily for a period of 6 months. Primary outcomes were investigated using validated questionnaires (VAS, CHAQ and PedsQL). Tekscan equipment (F-Scan -Trademark) and (HR Walkway - Registered Trademark) measured secondary outcomes in-shoe pressure and force data with and without FOs intervention. Multiple foot strikes and repetitive gait patterns were compared pre and post-treatment. Primary and secondary outcome measures were recorded at baseline, 3rd and 6th month’s period; each data collection took no more than 1 hour in total.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
288391
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control FOs, or placebo FOs was supplied to patients who were randomly included in the control group. The control FOs was made of leather board (1mm), grey Poron (1mm), and black EVA (0.75mm) as covering. This thin inner sole did not have any sort of biomechanical support, nor had it any effect on the distribution of pressure, as it was completely flat. In addition, the placebo FOs did not present with any intrinsic or extrinsic correction underneath the sub-talar-joint (STJ). The use of black EVA as the covering material and the leather-board as a base, allowed for gathering of a dynamic impression over the 6 months of the trial.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
291020
0
effects of pre-formed semi-rigid FOs on Pain in Paediatric Rheumatology using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
291020
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
291020
0
6 months
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
291021
0
effects of pre-formed semi-rigid FOs on Quality of Life in Paediatric Rheumatology using the questionnaires PedsQL.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
291021
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
291021
0
6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
305854
0
JIA gait parameters when barefoot such as plantar pressure analysis, stance time and velocity, utilising the HR Walkway system.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
305854
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
305854
0
6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
305855
0
JIA gait parameters with shoes (without FOs) such as plantar pressure analysis utilizing the F-Scan system
Query!
Assessment method [2]
305855
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
305855
0
6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
305856
0
JIA gait parameters with shoes and with FOs, such as plantar pressure analysis utilizing the F-Scan system.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
305856
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
305856
0
6 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Diagnosed with JIA according to ILAR criteria.
- All subjects with lower extremity joint involvement with disease onset ranging from 5 to 18 years old.
- Previous failure of orthotic management, where the patient has not worn any FOs for a period of at least 3 months.
- Ability to walk a minimum of 15 metres without assistive devices.
- Six months after start of DMARD therapy.
Query!
Minimum age
5
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Inability to walk barefoot or shod.
- Concomitant musculoskeletal disease, central or peripheral nerve disease and endocrine disorders, especially Diabetes Mellitus.
- Previous foot surgery.
- Currently using foot orthosis.
- Where supply of orthotics are contraindicated: (Less than 12 degrees at subtler joint; Fully compensated ankle equinus; Osseous anomaly noted in the lower limbs and/or vertebrae during the physical evaluation; Inappropriate footwear for fitting orthoses).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The participants were recruited from the Paediatric Rheumatology Department of the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh; and from the Paediatric Rheumatology Clinic in Ninewells Hospital, Dundee in 2011 and 2012. The Paediatric Rheumatologists identified the patients who were eligible and met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After obtaining informed consent, children were randomised in blocks by online computer random number generator (www.randomization.com) to wear fitted FOs or control FOs.
Verbal and written consent was sought both from the child and parent (carer). Each participant was able to withdraw from the study at any time without providing any explanation.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
children were randomised by online computer random number generator to wear fitted FOs or control FOs. Given uncertainty around the potential for recruiting to the trial, block randomisation was used to limit the risk of biased allocation in the light of either poor recrutiment or the study finishing early.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Statistical differences between the control and trial groups were compared at 3 time points (baseline, 3 and 6 months). All data showed a non-parametric distribution hence a Mann-Whitney U test was used for the pairwise comparisons.
For a 5% 2-sided t-test with a=0.05 and power 80% for a RCT design with baseline and 2 post-intervention observations, and a moderate effect size, it was estimated that a total of 46 JIA children would be required (23 controls and 23 trial).
The study was overpowered to an estimated 30 participants per group to allow for potential dropouts during the 6 months data collection period.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/10/2009
Query!
Actual
30/10/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
29/10/2010
Query!
Actual
29/10/2010
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
5664
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [1]
5664
0
Scotland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
288378
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
288378
0
University of Newcastle - NSW, Australia
Query!
Address [1]
288378
0
Dr Andrea Coda
Lecturer Podiatry
School of Health & Science
PO Box 127 - Ourimbah
NSW 2258 - Australia
Query!
Country [1]
288378
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Newcastle (NSW)
Query!
Address
Dr Andrea Coda
Lecturer Podiatry
School of Health & Science
PO Box 127 - Ourimbah
NSW 2258 - Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
287082
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
287082
0
Dr Andrea Coda
Query!
Address [1]
287082
0
Dr Andrea Coda
Lecturer Podiatry
School of Health & Science
PO Box 127 - Ourimbah
NSW 2258 - Australia
Query!
Country [1]
287082
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
290261
0
NHS Lothian (Scotland)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
290261
0
Mrs Sandra Wyllie Committee Co-ordinator NHS Lothian Waverley Gate 2-4 Waterloo Place Edinburgh EH1 3EG
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
290261
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
290261
0
08/05/2009
Query!
Approval date [1]
290261
0
12/05/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
290261
0
REC no: 09/S1101/21
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Currently there is limited evidence supporting podiatric treatment of children with JIA. The foot orthoses (FOs) prescribed to JIA children so far appeared to be very expensive and required long time to manufacture before the fitting. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to determine whether pre-formed FOs that can be prescribed at chair side, impacted on pain, quality of life (primary outcomes) and/or gait-parameters (secondary outcomes) in children affected by JIA
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
1. Ravelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet 2007;369(9563):767-778. 2. Brostrom E, Ortqvist M, Haglund-Akerlind Y, et al. Trunk and center of mass movements during gait in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Hum Mov Sci 2007;26(2):296-305. 3. Takken T, Van BM, Engelber, RH, et al Exercise therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a Cochrane Review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2008;44(3):287-297. 4. Evans AM. Relationship Between “Growing Pains” and Foot Posture in Children: Single-Case Experimental Designs in Clinical Practice. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003;93(2):111-117. 5. Hendry G, Gardner-Medwin J, Watt GF, et al. A survey of foot problems in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Musculoskeletal Care 2008;6(4):221-32. 6. Cakmak A, Bolukbas N. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: physical therapy and rehabilitation. South Med J 2005;98(2):212-216. 7. Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, et al. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data information point: Visual Analogue Scale. J Clin Nurs 2001;10(5):697-706. 8. Dhanani S, Quenneville J, Perron M, et al. Minimal difference in pain associated with change in quality of life in children with rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum 2002;47(5):501-505. 9. Varni JW, Seid M, Smith KT, Burwinkle T, Brown J. Szer IS. The PedsQL in pediatric rheumatology: reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales and Rheumatology Module. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46(3):714-725. 10. Noordzij, M; Tripepi, G; Dekker, F.W; Zoccali, C; Tanck, M.W; Jager, K.J. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. NephrolDialTransplant 2010;25(5):1388-93. 11. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, N.J, L. Erlbaum Associates. Second Edition. ISBN: 0-8058-0283-5. (3) pp:75-105. 12. Powell M, Seid M, Szer IS. Efficacy of custom foot orthotics in improving pain and functional status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomized trial. J Rheumatol 2005;32(5):943-50.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
44730
0
Dr Andrea Coda
Query!
Address
44730
0
Lecturer Podiatry
School of Health & Science
University of Newcastle
PO Box 127 - Ourimbah
NSW 2258 - Australia
Query!
Country
44730
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
44730
0
+61456444842
Query!
Fax
44730
0
Query!
Email
44730
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
44731
0
Andrea Coda
Query!
Address
44731
0
Lecturer Podiatry
School of Health & Science
University of Newcastle
PO Box 127 - Ourimbah
NSW 2258 - Australia
Query!
Country
44731
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
44731
0
+61456444842
Query!
Fax
44731
0
Query!
Email
44731
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
44732
0
Andrea Coda
Query!
Address
44732
0
Lecturer Podiatry
School of Health & Science
University of Newcastle
PO Box 127 - Ourimbah
NSW 2258 - Australia
Query!
Country
44732
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
44732
0
+61456444842
Query!
Fax
44732
0
Query!
Email
44732
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF