Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12614000459628
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
20/04/2014
Date registered
2/05/2014
Date last updated
2/05/2014
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Distraction using an iPad during pulpotomy in children
Query!
Scientific title
Comparative efficacy of active distraction and passive distraction during pulpotomy in children: Audiovisual eyeglasses versus an iPad—A randomized controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
284468
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1155-9482
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Pain during dental treatment in children.
291700
0
Query!
Fear and anxiety from dental treatment.
291701
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Alternative and Complementary Medicine
292079
292079
0
0
Query!
Other alternative and complementary medicine
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
292132
292132
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The clinical investigation will involve a randomized, controlled, split-mouth study of young children receiving local anesthesia for restorative treatment including vital pulp therapy (i.e., pulpotomy). The study will compare pain, behavior, and heart rate measurements from an exposure group (treatment completed with the aid of an iPad) and control group (treatment completed with the aid of AV eyeglasses). We will assigne each of these two treatments to either left or right halves of the primary dentition.
The duration for the iPad session and the eyeglasses session will be the time required to complete pulpotomy (about 30 minutes). The interval between the iPad session and eyeglasses session will be 1 week.
we will offer children the option to choose one game or movie from a pool of 6 games/movies (AV eyeglasses movies: Sponge Bob Square Pants (Viacom International Inc.), Tom and Jerry (Cartoon Network), and Shaun the Sheep (Asrdman Animations Ltd.); iPad VGs: Air Hockey Gold (Acceleroto), Paper Toss (Backflip Studios, Inc.), and Ninja Jump (Ninja Jump, Inc.).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
289223
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Active control (audiovisual eyeglasses). It will be applied during the time required to complete pulpotomy (about 30 minutes).
we will offer children the option to choose one movie from a pool of 3 movies (AV eyeglasses movies: Sponge Bob Square Pants (Viacom International Inc.), Tom and Jerry (Cartoon Network), and Shaun the Sheep (Asrdman Animations Ltd.).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
291952
0
Effectiveness of an iPad versus audiovisual glasses in controlling pain (pain perceived by a patient as measured by Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale) and reducing disruptive behavior (as measured by North Carolina Behavior Rating Scale) during dental treatments in children.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
291952
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
291952
0
Pain and behavior will rated during treatment. The ratings will be made at 7 separate intervals: (1) 5 minutes before treatment (BT), (2) during administration of local anesthesia (LA), (3) after rubber dam clamp placement (RD), (4) during caries removal (CR), (5) during pulp amputation (PA), (6) during insertion of the restorative material (RM), and (7) 5 minutes postoperatively (PO).
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
307909
0
Effect of an iPad versus audiovisual glasses on heart rates of children during dental treatment. Child’s heart rates will be recorded during those intervals using a fingertip pulse oximetry
Query!
Assessment method [1]
307909
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
307909
0
The heart rate recording will be made at 7 separate intervals: (1) 5 minutes before treatment (BT), (2) during administration of local anesthesia (LA), (3) after rubber dam clamp placement (RD), (4) during caries removal (CR), (5) during pulp amputation (PA), (6) during insertion of the restorative material (RM), and (7) 5 minutes postoperatively (PO).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
children should be 4 to 9 years old, with no medically or developmentally compromising conditions, and in need of vital pulp therapy treatment in the posterior region of the mouth. Each child patient should have at least two primary antimere molars with lesions of similar size requiring restorative treatment including pulpotomy.
Query!
Minimum age
4
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
9
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Children with mental or cognitive problems that could compromise their basic comprehension of the trial and its conduct, those who were or are undergoing medical or dental treatment that might affect their behavior during the study, and those with heartbeat disorders. We will exclude children from the final analysis if they or their parents abandoned the study by their choice or any other reasons.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
We will randomly assigne child patients to receive the treatment using an iPad (Group A) at one visit, while the AV eyeglasses will be used at the second visit. Each of those in Group B will receive the same two treatments, but in reverse order. For each child patient, random selection will determine which tooth would be treated by which method of distraction. Both types of distraction techniques will be given to all child participants along with local anesthesia.
The person who determined if a subject will be eligible for inclusion in the trial was unaware, when this decision was made, to which group the subject would be allocated. Allocation will involve contacting the holder of the allocation schedule who is not part of the study's investigators.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Coin toss.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Split-mouth design.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The 2 distraction techniques will be compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test for pain and behavior scores and paired t-test for heart rate scores.
A sample size calculation was performed based on Wilcoxon Paired Signed Rank test, assuming the standard deviation of 1.53 (based on a 4-point scale for pain from none to severe) and a paired difference of 1 (effect size ES 0.65). When alpha 0.05 and ES 0.65, the sample size required for a power of 0.84 would be 23 participants (pairs). The sample size was increased to 50 to increase the study's power and to compensate for participants' drop-out.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2013
Query!
Actual
10/09/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/08/2014
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
6016
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [1]
6016
0
Riyadh
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
289114
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
289114
0
Reem Attar
Query!
Address [1]
289114
0
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy
P.O. Box 84891 Riyadh 11681, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Query!
Country [1]
289114
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
289115
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [2]
289115
0
Ziad Baghdadi
Query!
Address [2]
289115
0
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy
P.O. Box 84891 Riyadh 11681, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Query!
Country [2]
289115
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Funding source category [3]
289116
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [3]
289116
0
Riyadh Colleges Dental Teaching Hospital
Query!
Address [3]
289116
0
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy
P.O. Box 84891 Riyadh 11681, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Query!
Country [3]
289116
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Reem Attar
Query!
Address
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy
P.O. Box 84891 Riyadh 11681, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Query!
Country
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
287777
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
287777
0
Query!
Address [1]
287777
0
Query!
Country [1]
287777
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
290897
0
Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Phramacy Postgraduate Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
290897
0
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy P.O. Box 84891 Riyadh 11681, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
290897
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
290897
0
31/12/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
290897
0
01/02/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
290897
0
PGRP/43235002/34
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study will compare the effects of an iPad versus eyeglasses in pain and anxiety management during dental treatment in children aged 4 to 9 years. The hypothesis is that an iPad would be more effective than eyeglasses.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
47866
0
Dr Ziad D. Baghdadi
Query!
Address
47866
0
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy
P.O. Box 67126
Riyadh 11596
Query!
Country
47866
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Phone
47866
0
+966564181589
Query!
Fax
47866
0
Query!
Email
47866
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
47867
0
Ziad D. Baghdadi
Query!
Address
47867
0
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy
P.O. Box 67126
Riyadh 11596
Query!
Country
47867
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Phone
47867
0
+966564181589
Query!
Fax
47867
0
Query!
Email
47867
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
47868
0
Ziad D. Baghdadi
Query!
Address
47868
0
Riyadh Colleges Dentistry & Pharmacy
P.O. Box 67126
Riyadh 11596
Query!
Country
47868
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
Phone
47868
0
+966564181589
Query!
Fax
47868
0
Query!
Email
47868
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF