Trial Review

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12616001583437
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/10/2016
Date registered
16/11/2016
Date last updated
22/11/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Speech treatment in Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay
Scientific title
Speech rehabilitiation for dysarthria resulting from Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay
Secondary ID [1] 289939 0
None
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1189-0773
Trial acronym
SRARSACS
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay 299921 0
Dysarthria 299922 0
Ataxia 299923 0
Condition category
Condition code
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders 299815 299815 0 0
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Neurological 299816 299816 0 0
Neurodegenerative diseases
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation 300761 300761 0 0
Speech therapy

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment involved a behavioural intervention designed to improve speech intelligibility and quality.

Materials: Patients are provided with a laptop computer with treatment software installed, head mounted USB microphone, treatment manual.

Procedures: The program specifically targets prosody, vocal control and over-enunciation with the aim of improving overall speech intelligibility and confidence when communicating. It is based on principles of motor learning and neuroplasticity relating to practice conditions and bio-feedback.

Phase I: Teaching and Establishment of treatment components
The clinician introduces the goals and content of the therapy. Patients learn the skills needed to undertake the program and implementation of the exercises. Using the computer program will be reviewed and practiced together on the first visit. Phase II: Instatement and Rehabilitation

A: Visual feedback:
Visual feedback is provided through the real time loudness display.
Patients can monitor the stability or variability of their loudness while speaking. For example, if patients cannot see any colour in the visual display they need to increase the loudness of their speech. Similarly, a stable production is required for the long vowel task, meaning the visual display should remain at a constant level throughout the production.
The feedback given by the interface supports the patient by training self-awareness. Loudness is represented visually, providing an alternative mode of feedback other than listening. Demonstrate and encourage the use of these feedback options.

B: Aural (listening) feedback:
Patients are prompted to record parts of their speech each day. They are then required to listen to their recorded sample from the previous day. Listening feedback is designed to enhance self-monitoring and help the speaker identify aspects of their speech that need improvement.

Listening to speech can be upsetting for some patients but it is a vital component of therapy. Delayed aural feedback is important for the development of self-monitoring skills by providing an opportunity to hear their performance, identify what worked and what went wrong and set some goals for the day.

C: Outcome feedback:
Patients are provided with immediate and objective feedback of their performance. Three pieces of information are derived from the recorded samples and compared against the previous days’ scores:
1. Duration, which is important for the long vowel task; 2-3. Loudness and pitch variation, both of which are important for the vowel and connected speech tasks. This information is designed to enhance the patient’s understanding of their performance and to provide a benchmark on which to compare earlier productions.
Summary figures are provided at the end of each day after tasks are completed. The clinician will be able to plot your patients’ progress – highlighting the gains made during therapy.

Therapy is completed in the home by the patient over 20 sessions within one month. Each session consists of excercises aiming to improve vocal quality and control, articulation, prosody and intelligibility. Self-evaluation skills are refined by the use of visual, aural and performance feedback and personalised problem-solving strategies. Clinicians monitor patient progress and provide support during this stage through weekly skype or phone calls.

Who: Treatment is coordinated by the treating clinician and completed in the home or clinic by the patient. Treating clinicians are trained speech-language pathologists with a minimum of 5 years' experience;

Mode of delivery: The first treatment session is conducted face to face. Each subsequent treatment day is conducted using the computer software. Adherence and progress is monitored weekly by the treating clinician via skype or telephone. Treatment is provided individually.

Number of times: The intervention will be delivered 20 times over a 30-day period. Patients are required to complete therapy 5 days out of every 7 for the period of the study. Treatment sessions take approximately 45 minutes to complete. 20 x 45 minute sessions 5 times a week for 4 weeks.

Location: Treatment is completed in patients home.
Intervention code [1] 295621 0
Rehabilitation
Intervention code [2] 296392 0
Treatment: Other
Comparator / control treatment
A randomized, assessor blinded, delayed entry design. Participants will be randomly allocated to either one of two conditions: Group A - start after four weeks of monitoring or Group B - delayed start after 8 weeks of monitoring
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 299968 0
Intelligibility as examined by blinded raters using direct magnitude estimation
Timepoint [1] 299968 0
Baseline and at 4 weeks (and 8 weeks for group B) post baseline. Then at 4 weeks post completion of treatment for both groups
Primary outcome [2] 300180 0
Naturalness as examined by blinded raters using direct magnitude estimation
Timepoint [2] 300180 0
Baseline and at 4 weeks (and 8 weeks for group B) post baseline. Then at 4 weeks post completion of treatment for both groups
Secondary outcome [1] 328725 0
Speech-related quality of life using the Dysarthria Impact Profile
Timepoint [1] 328725 0
Baseline and immediately post completion of treatment for both groups
Secondary outcome [2] 328726 0
Overall disease severity using the Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA)
Timepoint [2] 328726 0
Baseline and at 4 weeks (and 8 weeks for group B) post baseline. Then at 4 weeks post completion of treatment for both groups
Secondary outcome [3] 329258 0
Acoustic analysis of speech: mean pause length
Timepoint [3] 329258 0
Baseline and at 4 weeks (and 8 weeks for group B) post baseline. Then at 4 weeks post completion of treatment for both groups
Secondary outcome [4] 329259 0
Acoustic analysis of voice: harmonics to noise ratio using praat
Timepoint [4] 329259 0
Baseline and at 4 weeks (and 8 weeks for group B) post baseline. Then at 4 weeks post completion of treatment for both groups
Secondary outcome [5] 329260 0
Acoustic analysis of speech: speech rate calculated by dividing syllables per second
Timepoint [5] 329260 0
Baseline and at 4 weeks (and 8 weeks for group B) post baseline. Then at 4 weeks post completion of treatment for both groups

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Diagnosis of Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS)
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
No diagnosis of Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS)

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?


The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Other
Other design features
The study is a randomised, assessor blinded, delayed entry design with two groups of participants, not a cross-over design
Phase
Not Applicable
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis
The use of the specific tools will depend on the collected data (ie. if data follow quasi-Gaussian distributions, ANOVA tests will be used; otherwise we will use non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney to compare groups). We will study the association strengths of objective characteristics of speech (eg. acoustic measures) with clinical and intelligibility measures using correlation coefficients and mutual information. We will compare densities computed using non-parametric approaches (eg. kernel density estimation) to identify differences between groups.

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
4/01/2016
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
31/03/2017
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
28/02/2017
Actual
30/06/2017
Sample size
Target
10
Accrual to date
Final
8
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 8349 0
Germany
State/province [1] 8349 0

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 294784 0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Name [1] 294784 0
FONDATION DE L'ATAXIE CHARLEVOIX-SAGUENAY
Country [1] 294784 0
Canada
Primary sponsor type
University
Name
The University of Melbourne
Address
550 Swanston Street, Parkville, 3010 Victoria
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 293630 0
Hospital
Name [1] 293630 0
Universitatsklinikum Tuebingen
Address [1] 293630 0
Geissweg 3, 72076 Tuebingen
Country [1] 293630 0
Germany

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 296191 0
Tuebingen University Medical Faculty Ethics Committee
Ethics committee address [1] 296191 0
Ethics committee country [1] 296191 0
Germany
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 296191 0
03/03/2015
Approval date [1] 296191 0
09/04/2015
Ethics approval number [1] 296191 0
003/2015B02

Summary
Brief summary
We have designed a home-based, intensive four week speech exercise program designed to improve speech in patients with ARSACS. The treatment protocol is based on principles of motor learning and neuroplasticity with a focus on improving intelligibility and vocal control. Exercises and feedback were created to enhance self-monitoring and include computer based aural, visual and results feedback and self-management.
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 48166 0
Dr Adam Vogel
Address 48166 0
The University of Melbourne
550 Swanston Street, Parkville, 3010 VIC
Country 48166 0
Australia
Phone 48166 0
+61390355334
Fax 48166 0
Email 48166 0
[email protected]
Contact person for public queries
Name 48167 0
Dr Adam Vogel
Address 48167 0
The University of Melbourne
550 Swanston Street, Parkville, 3010 VIC
Country 48167 0
Australia
Phone 48167 0
+61390355334
Fax 48167 0
Email 48167 0
[email protected]
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 48168 0
Dr Adam Vogel
Address 48168 0
The University of Melbourne
550 Swanston Street, Parkville, 3010 VIC
Country 48168 0
Australia
Phone 48168 0
+61390355334
Fax 48168 0
Email 48168 0
[email protected]

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
SourceTitleYear of PublicationDOI
EmbaseSpeech treatment improves dysarthria in multisystemic ataxia: a rater-blinded, controlled pilot-study in ARSACS.2019https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09258-4
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.