Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12614000819628
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
23/07/2014
Date registered
1/08/2014
Date last updated
17/03/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Visuospatial ability and brachial plexus sonography performance
Query!
Scientific title
In novices without prior ultrasonography experience, does the degree of innate visuospatial ability confer an advantage in successful performance of brachial plexus sonography
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
285047
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1159-6392
Query!
Trial acronym
not applicable
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
visuospatial ability
292565
0
Query!
ultrasound imaging of the brachial plexus
292566
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
292872
292872
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This is a prospective observational study of adult novices with no prior exposure to ultrasonography training or teaching. Baseline testing of novices' innate visuospatial ability will be performed using validated assessment tools of visuospatial performance, including components of the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, the Vanderberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test, and the Thurston and Jeffrey Flexibility of Closure Test. All of these tests are desktop paper and pencil, or manipulation of wooden blocks to construct shapes, and administered by a trained neuropsychologist.
After watching a short didactic instruction 15 minute video, novices are next taken to a human volunteer and asked to perform non-invasive ultrasonography of the brachial plexus from neck to axilla. Image quality, smoothness of ultrasound scanning, and ability to obtain standardised images will be assessed using an objective scoring form by Assessors, who are experts in sonography.
The assessment of visuospatial ability and scoring of performance will take a weekend.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
289883
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Experts in ultrasonography of the brachial plexus (those performing at least 50 cases per year) will also be administered the visuospatial assessment tools, and be asked to perform the same sonography task on the same human volunteer. Experts' performance on the task will be assessed using the same objective scoring form by the same Assessors.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
292742
0
Sonographic performance between novices and experts, based on objective assessment scores. This assessment form has been designed specifically for this study
Query!
Assessment method [1]
292742
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
292742
0
At end of brief training in sonography
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
292743
0
Sonographic performance between novices with low and high visuospatial ability, when stratified using tests of visuospatial skill on specific domains (Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, Vanderberg and Kuse Mental Rotations, and Thurston and Jeffrey Flexibility of Closure tests)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
292743
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
292743
0
at end of brief training in sonography
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
309588
0
nil
Query!
Assessment method [1]
309588
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
309588
0
nil
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
adult volunteers enrolled in health sciences degree in a tertiary educational institution (nursing, medicine, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, medical science)
Normal or corrected to normal visual acuity
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Prior experience, exposure to ultrasound teaching or training
Prior musculoskeletal ultrasound of the neck or shoulder, due to potential bias arising from viewing the technique
Radiology students, due to potential bias from learning from other imaging modalities
Previous cognitive or psychological testing in the past 12 months, due to potential contamination from performing similar psychometric tests of visuospatial ability
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Screening
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Endpoints are individual scores in the visuospatial tests of the different domains. Performance in the sonography task is recorded as a time taken to complete, individual item scores on the objective assessment tool, and a composite performance score. Linear mixed models will be used to model each sonographic outcome. Variables in these models include expertise and the visuospatial baseline measurements. Based on the mixed models, we will compare the sonographic performance between novices and experts , and between higher and lower visuospatial ability.
No previous study has been conducted in anaesthesia or radiology examining the visuospatial ability in ultrasound imaging. However, based on other studies in surgical laparoscopic skills and gastroenterlological endoscopy skills, novices were strongly discriminated in ability based on small sample sizes <30 participants. It is thought that in early uptake of new hand-eye coordination skills, visuospatial ability is dominant in learning. A sample size of 30 was chosen for this observational study for reasons of feasibility.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2015
Query!
Actual
28/03/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
28/03/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
35
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
34
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
2766
0
Liverpool Hospital - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
8464
0
2170 - Liverpool
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
289653
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
289653
0
Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
289653
0
c/ Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country [1]
289653
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Hospital
Query!
Address
Department of Anaesthesia
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
288380
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
288380
0
Query!
Address [1]
288380
0
Query!
Country [1]
288380
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
291389
0
South Western Sydney Local Health District HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
291389
0
Research and Ethics Office Locked Bag 7103 LIVERPOOL BC NSW 1871
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
291389
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
291389
0
20/08/2014
Query!
Approval date [1]
291389
0
16/10/2014
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
291389
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) is a complex procedural task that anaesthetists must learn. UGRA has been shown to have greater efficacy and safety than other nerve block localisation techniques and is thus the standard of care for performing peripheral nerve blockade. Task deconstruction reveals that bimanual dexterity, hand-eye coordination and sonographic interpretation are some of the skills necessary for performance of UGRA. There is likely to be a correlation with visuospatial aptitude (defined as the ability to generate, retain and manipulate abstract visual images) and superior performance in UGRA in novices. This study aims to evaluate the importance of visuospatial aptitude on the performance of UGRA in both novices and experts and which domains of visual perception are most closely linked to UGRA performance. We will recruit novices to UGRA and administer a series of psychometric tests on visuospatial ability, to identify individuals with higher and lower skills. All novices will be asked to perform non-invasive, ultrasound scanning of the neck and shoulder of healthy human volunteers and their performance on several metrics (image quality, time, stability, and ability to obtain standard images) will be recorded. Experts in UGRA will tested as well, and they provide a control group against whom the novices will be compared to.
Query!
Trial website
n/a
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
submitted to journal
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
50178
0
Dr Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
50178
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
50178
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
50178
0
+61 2 9828 3173
Query!
Fax
50178
0
Query!
Email
50178
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
50179
0
Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
50179
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
50179
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
50179
0
+61 2 9828 3173
Query!
Fax
50179
0
Query!
Email
50179
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
50180
0
Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
50180
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
50180
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
50180
0
+61 2 9828 3173
Query!
Fax
50180
0
Query!
Email
50180
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF