Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000064505
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/11/2014
Date registered
23/01/2015
Date last updated
7/07/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Stop Cancer PAIN Trial: A guideline implementation study
Query!
Scientific title
A pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of guidelines and screening with implementation strategies versus guidelines and screening alone for cancer pain in adult outpatients attending oncology and palliative care services
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
285472
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1164-4649
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cancer pain
293249
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
293519
293519
0
0
Query!
Any cancer
Query!
Public Health
294094
294094
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
A system for screening for cancer pain and feeding back results to the medical team to inform treatment + strategies to implement evidence-based guidelines for screening, assessment and management of cancer pain as follows:
1. An audit tool will be administered twice over a 3 month period to enable centres to monitor how well they are implementing core standards of cancer pain assessment and management.
2. A toolkit for identifying barriers and facilitators to practice change and implementing strategies to overcome these;
3. QStream online health professional education to test and consolidate knowledge of cancer pain assessment and management as recommended in the 'Cancer pain management in adults' guidelines available from the Cancer Council Australia Cancer Guideline Wiki;
4. Patient-held resources to ensure management remains centred on individual patient needs, support patient-health professional communication and coordination and help patients advocate for evidence-based, person-centred care. Patients and caregivers will be offered brief training in how to use the resources by a staff member at the centre.
Centres will be asked to implement the above strategies for a 4 month period and will be at liberty to continue them for as long as they wish afterwards.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
290408
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
A system for screening for cancer pain and feeding back results to the medical team to inform care for cancer pain according to local practice. The system will allow patients to report their pain and quality of life via touchscreen computer at each visit to the service whilst waiting to see their medical team. Results will be fed back to the medical team via print-out and/or email prior to the consultation.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
293335
0
Probability that patients screened as having moderate-severe worst pain (5+ on a 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) will experience a clinically important improvement of 30%+ on the NRS.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
293335
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
293335
0
1 week after screening positive for moderate-severe worst pain
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
310814
0
Patient mean pain as measured on a 0-10 NRS
Query!
Assessment method [1]
310814
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
310814
0
1, 2 and 4 weeks after screening positive for having clinically significant worst pain (2+ on 0-10 NRS)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
310815
0
Patient quality of life (QOL) as measured by the EORTC QLQ C15-PAL
Query!
Assessment method [2]
310815
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
310815
0
1, 2 and 4 weeks after screening positive for having clinically significant worst pain
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
310816
0
Carer experience, measured by the Carer Experience Scale (CES)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
310816
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
310816
0
2 and 4 weeks after participating recipient of care screened positive for having moderate-severe worst pain
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
311589
0
Patient empowerment, measured by the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
311589
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
311589
0
1, 2 and 4 weeks after screening positive for having clinically significant worst pain
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
311590
0
Cost effectiveness, as measured by incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
311590
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
311590
0
Period of 4 weeks since patient screened positive for clinically significant worst pain
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria for patients to be included in the primary endpoint will be: 1) attending a participating cancer or palliative care service as an outpatient during the study period; 2) having a diagnosis of cancer; 3) being able to self-complete a 0-10 NRS for severity of worst and average pain in English, Chinese, Italian, Greek, Vietnamese or Arabic; 4) choosing not to opt-out of being contacted 1 week later to complete the NRS over the telephone and giving verbal consent to do so when telephoned; 5) a score of moderate-severe (5+) on the NRS for worst pain.
Inclusion criteria for patients contributing to secondary outcomes will be meeting inclusion criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 above and also: 5) a score 2+ on the NRS for worst pain; 6) providing written informed consent in English; 7) having spoken and written English proficiency sufficient to complete study measures.
Inclusion criteria for carers will be: 1) being identified by a patient who has given written informed consent to participate in the study as providing them with substantial emotional and practical support in an unpaid capacity; 2) providing written informed consent; 3) having spoken and written English proficiency sufficient to complete a brief survey and/or interview.
Inclusion criteria for centre staff will be: 1) being employed on a permanent basis either full- or part-time at a participating oncology or palliative care service in a role that provides clinical care to patients with cancer pain or front desk, client-focused administrative support; 2) providing written informed consent.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients
- Participation at another centre taking part in the trial or at the same centre at a previous time when it was in the control arm
- Documented as having cognitive impairment that would preclude capacity to give informed consent
Unpaid carers
- Patient for whom they provide care is not participating in any secondary outcome components
Centre Staff
- Casual or agency staff
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
This trial uses a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled design, which means that the unit of randomisation is at the outpatient service rather than patient. All centres will start in the control arm and then transition to intervention; it is the order in which they transition that will be randomised. Patients will be automatically assigned to the arm which the service is in at the time that they present.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2015
Query!
Actual
10/08/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
800
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
3181
0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
3209
0
St George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
4048
0
Concord Repatriation Hospital - Concord
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
8224
0
Flinders Medical Centre - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
8225
0
Wollongong Hospital - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
8501
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
8502
0
Royal North Shore Hospital - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
16594
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
16595
0
2065 - St Leonards
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290284
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
290284
0
National Breast Cancer Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
290284
0
Level 9
50 Pitt St
Sydney
NSW 2000
Query!
Country [1]
290284
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Room 205
Edward Ford Building A27
Camperdown NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
288996
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
288996
0
Query!
Address [1]
288996
0
Query!
Country [1]
288996
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
278250
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
278250
0
Improving Palliative Care through Clinical Trials (ImPaCCT)
Query!
Address [1]
278250
0
UTS Faculty of Health,
Building 10 Level 7,
235 Jones St,
Ultimo
NSW 2007
Query!
Country [1]
278250
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
291781
0
South Western Sydney Local Health District
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
291781
0
Locked Bag 7103 Liverpool BC NSW 1871
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
291781
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
291781
0
27/10/2014
Query!
Approval date [1]
291781
0
10/12/2014
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
291781
0
HREC/14/LPOOL/479
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study will evaluate strategies to implement evidence-based guidelines for screening, assessment and management of cancer pain in adult outpatients presenting at oncology and palliative care services. Who is it for? You may be eligible to join this study if you are aged 18 years or above, have been diagnosed with any cancer and are attending a participating cancer centre as an outpatient. Study details All centres will start in the control arm and transition to intervention arm, but the order in which they transition will be allocated randomly (i.e. by chance). The control arm will receive screening for cancer pain with feedback to medical team to inform treatment and care according to local practice. The intervention includes the addition of strategies to implement evidence-based guidelines for screening, assessment and management of cancer pain. Strategies will include: An audit tool to enable centres to monitor how well they are implementing core standards of cancer pain assessment and management; a toolkit for identifying barriers and facilitators to practice change and implementing strategies to overcome these; QStream online health professional education to test and consolidate knowledge of cancer pain assessment and management; patient-held resources to ensure management remains centred on individual patient needs, support patient-health professional communication and coordination and help patients advocate for evidence-based, person-centred care. The study will compare a time before the strategies are introduced with the time when they are being used to see if there is a difference in the probability of a clinically important reduction in pain for patients with moderate-severe pain. It will also test the effects of the strategies on patient quality of life and empowerment, carer experience, and cost-effectiveness of care.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
52002
0
Prof Melanie Lovell
Query!
Address
52002
0
Greenwich Hospital
Pallister House
97-115 River Road
GREENWICH
NSW 2065
Query!
Country
52002
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
52002
0
+612 9903 8333
Query!
Fax
52002
0
Query!
Email
52002
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
52003
0
Alison Read
Query!
Address
52003
0
University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Faculty of Health, Building 10, Level 7, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007
Query!
Country
52003
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
52003
0
+612 9514 4858
Query!
Fax
52003
0
+61 2 9514 4474
Query!
Email
52003
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
52004
0
Alison Read
Query!
Address
52004
0
University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Faculty of Health, Building 10, Level 7, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007
Query!
Country
52004
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
52004
0
+612 9514 4858
Query!
Fax
52004
0
+61 2 9514 4474
Query!
Email
52004
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Improving the system for managing cancer pain.
2015
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.12677
Embase
Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3318-0
Embase
Treatment patterns and out-of-hospital healthcare resource utilisation by patients with advanced cancer living with pain: An analysis from the Stop Cancer PAIN trial.
2023
https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282465
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF