Trial Review

The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12614001233617
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
12/11/2014
Date registered
25/11/2014
Date last updated
13/02/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Does the bubble­-positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device improve secretion clearance compared to the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) or no intervention (control) in people with non­-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis?
Scientific title
Does the bubble­-positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device improve secretion clearance compared to the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) or no intervention (control) in people with non­-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis?
Secondary ID [1] 285650 0
None
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis 293496 0
Condition category
Condition code
Respiratory 293775 293775 0 0
Other respiratory disorders / diseases

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Bubble-positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device:
Administered: Mouth-piece PEP device.
Pressure of 10-20cm H2O.
1 cycle = 3-4 deep breaths followed by 10 repetitions of blowing into the Bubble-PEP device and then 2 huffs and coughs. Repetitive cycles for a total intervention time of 30 minutes (with rest periods as needed).

Adherence will be monitored by the physiotherapist delivering the intervention.
Intervention code [1] 290593 0
Treatment: Devices
Comparator / control treatment
Comparators - ACBT or no intervention
Active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) is a self-administered breathing technique consisting of a cycle of controlled breathing, deep breathing, huffs and coughs.
Dose/intensity used: N/A.
Repetitive cycles of the ACBT for a a total intervention time of 30 minutes (with rest periods as needed).

Adherence will be monitored by the physiotherapist delivering the intervention.
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 293571 0
Weight of sputum as measured by calibrated scales.
Timepoint [1] 293571 0
During 30 minutes of intervention and 60 minutes post intervention.
Secondary outcome [1] 311391 0
To evaluate the acceptability and perceived benefits of the bubble­PEP device by participants immediately post intervention. This will be measured by a 5 point Likert scale.
Timepoint [1] 311391 0
Immediately Post intervention

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Confirmed diagnosis of bronchiectasis on CT
­- Reported daily sputum production
­- Ability to perform airway clearance techniques
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
- Primary diagnosis of CF, asthma, COPD
- Any contraindications to use of PEP e.g. severe haemoptysis, pneumothorax, recent AMI, exacerbation in the previous 4 weeks
- Inability to consent or understand English
- Cognitive impairment (MMSE<24)

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Other design features
Phase
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/01/2015
Actual
9/04/2015
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
9/12/2016
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
16/12/2016
Sample size
Target
39
Accrual to date
Final
35
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 290236 0
Hospital
Name [1] 290236 0
Prince of Wales Hospital
Country [1] 290236 0
Australia
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Name
Prince of Wales Hospital
Address
61 High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 288943 0
University
Name [1] 288943 0
University of Sydney
Address [1] 288943 0
Faculty of Health Sciences
Cumberland Campus C42
The University of Sydney
PO Box 170
Lidcombe NSW 1825
AUSTRALIA
Country [1] 288943 0
Australia

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 291939 0
SESLHD Human Research Ethics Committee
Ethics committee address [1] 291939 0
Ethics committee country [1] 291939 0
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 291939 0
Approval date [1] 291939 0
07/11/2014
Ethics approval number [1] 291939 0

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 52730 0
Ms Mary Santos
Address 52730 0
Prince of Wales Hospital, Physiotherapy Department, 61 High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031
Country 52730 0
Australia
Phone 52730 0
+610293822671
Fax 52730 0
Email 52730 0
[email protected]
Contact person for public queries
Name 52731 0
Mary Santos
Address 52731 0
Prince of Wales Hospital, Physiotherapy Department, 61 High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031
Country 52731 0
Australia
Phone 52731 0
+610293822671
Fax 52731 0
Email 52731 0
[email protected]
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 52732 0
Mary Santos
Address 52732 0
Prince of Wales Hospital, Physiotherapy Department, 61 High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031
Country 52732 0
Australia
Phone 52732 0
+610293822671
Fax 52732 0
Email 52732 0
[email protected]

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.