Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000837527
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
8/12/2014
Date registered
11/08/2015
Date last updated
17/03/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A comparative evaluation of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia combined with paravertebral block for renal surgeries
Query!
Scientific title
General anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia combined with paravertebral block for renal surgeries regarding haemodynamic parameters, surgical conditions
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
285800
0
no
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anaesthesia during renal surgeries
293693
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
293994
293994
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Renal and Urogenital
294389
294389
0
0
Query!
Kidney disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
All patients will receive ranitidine 150 mg as premedication a night before and on the morning of surgery with a sip of water. In the operation theatre, intravenous (IV) access will be secured with 18G cannula and all patients were pre-loaded with 10 ml/kg of Ringer lactate solution. Standard monitoring include electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ), non-invasive blood pressure, urinary output and respiratory rate (RR).
Group I: includes patients for whom paravertebral catheter will be inserted on the proposed side of operation, in sitting posture, under strict aseptic precautions and after infiltration with local anesthetic, 2.5 cm lateral to the tip of spinous process of T10 vertebra, Tuohy needle was advanced perpendicular to the skin in all planes to contact the transverse process of the vertebra, typically at a depth of 2 to 4 cm. After the transverse process was identified, the needle was redirected cephalad and gradually advanced until loss of resistance was felt 1 to 1.5 cm distal to its superior edge.
Through the needle a 18G epidural catheter was placed 3 cm inside T10–T11 paravertebral space. Then, spinal anesthesia was performed with spinal needle 25 gauge at the level of L3-L4 with 2 ml bupivacine 0.5%. Sensory levels were checked with bilateral pin -prick method while motor blockade was assessed with modified Bromage scale (0 = no block, 1 = inability to raise extended leg, 2 = inability to flex the knee and 3 = inability to flex ankle and foot). Paravertebral block was performed with 10 ml bupivacine 0.5%. Equipments for general anesthesia will be ready in case of failure of regional technique.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
290774
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Group II: Induction of anesthesia will be achieved with propofol 2 mg/kg, fentanyl 1microgram/kg will be given intravenously. and cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg as a muscle relaxant to facilitate endotracheal intubation with appropriate sized endotracheal tube. Maintenance of anesthesia will be achieved with isoflurane (1 MAC), oxygen and cis-atracurium as a muscle relaxant increments and fentanyl 0.5micro gram /kg when will be required. Isoflurane will be tapered before the anticipated end of surgery and stopped during the completion of skin closure. The patients will be extubated after adequate recovery.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
293776
0
Haemodynamic parameters is a composite primary outcome including; heart rate by ECG and mean arterial blood pressure by Non invasive monitor every 5 minutes for 15 minutes after induction of anesthesia and then every 15 minute till end of surgery.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
293776
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
293776
0
Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure every 5 minutes for 15 minutes after induction of anesthesia and then every 15 minute till end of surgery.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
293777
0
surgeon's satisfaction by 5 point scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
293777
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
293777
0
intra-operatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
311800
0
Opioid consumption during the follow up period by patient self-report in daily diary
Query!
Assessment method [1]
311800
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
311800
0
during follow up period (one year)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
311804
0
Side-effects such as nausea and vomiting, headache, respiratory depression, shivering and dry mouth will be noted during intra-operative period in awake patients
Query!
Assessment method [2]
311804
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
311804
0
intraoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
312700
0
Patient satisfaction t by 10-point scale
Query!
Assessment method [3]
312700
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
312700
0
during surgery for awake patients, the recovery period and first analgesic requirement in the immediate post-operative period in both groups up to 12 hours post-operative
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class-I and II adult patients of either gender in the age group of 18-60 years undergoing renal surgeries (pyelo-lithotomy, uretero-lithotomy, and nephrectomy) will be enrolled in the study. A written informed consent will be obtained from all the patients
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac rhythm disturbances, obesity, severe pulmonary disease, hepatic impairment, deranged coagulation profile, cerebrovascular disorder.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2015
Query!
Actual
1/09/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
6514
0
Egypt
Query!
State/province [1]
6514
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290363
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
290363
0
Ahmed A. Eldaba
Query!
Address [1]
290363
0
Assistant professor- Department of anesthesia & surgical intensive care Faculty of medicine- Tanta university-
Egypt- El-Geish street - Tanta city- 31527
Query!
Country [1]
290363
0
Egypt
Query!
Funding source category [2]
290364
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [2]
290364
0
Sabry M. Amin
Query!
Address [2]
290364
0
Assistant professor- Department of anesthesia & surgical intensive care
Faculty of medicine- Tanta university
Egypt- El-Geish street - Tanta city- 31527
Query!
Country [2]
290364
0
Egypt
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Ahmed A. Eldaba
Query!
Address
Assistant professor- Department of anesthesia & surgical intensive care
Faculty of medicine- Tanta university
Egypt- El-Geish street - Tanta city- 31527
Query!
Country
Egypt
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289087
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
289087
0
Sabry M. Amin
Query!
Address [1]
289087
0
Assistant professor- Department of anesthesia & surgical intensive care
Faculty of medicine- Tanta university
Egypt- El-Geish street - Tanta city- 31527
Query!
Country [1]
289087
0
Egypt
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292067
0
Faculty of medicine- Tanta university
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292067
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292067
0
Egypt
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292067
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
292067
0
01/12/2014
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292067
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
While choosing an anesthetic technique for renal surgeries, desirable characteristics include hemodynamic stability, lesser blood loss, early ambulation, better post-operative analgesia and lower incidence of side-effects such as nausea and vomiting, shivering, cough, headache, respiratory depression. General anesthesia has remained the most common technique for renal surgeries because of the discomfited body position duringprocedures. General anesthesia carries risks such as stress response and cardiac complications during induction of anesthesia, airway difficulties during intubation, awareness, analgesia in the post-operative period, difficult extubation, post-operative restlessness, over-sedation and agitation. Previous studies have compared combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia and general anesthesia for renal surgeries. These studies reported that, the only disadvantage with the combined approach is the hemodynamic instability and unpredictable sensory blockade levels. we plan our study to compare general anesthesia versus combined spinal and paravertebral block technique in patients undergoing renal surgeries. The study will compare the haemodynamic parameters, surgical conditions, surgeon's satisfaction intra-operatively and patient's satisfaction in the immediate post-operative period in the two groups. The secondary outcome includes the side-effects associated with the anesthesia techniques.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
53322
0
A/Prof Ahmed A. Eldaba
Query!
Address
53322
0
Assistant professor- Department of anesthesia & surgical intensive care
Faculty of medicine- Tanta university
Egypt- El-Geish street - Tanta city- 31527
Query!
Country
53322
0
Egypt
Query!
Phone
53322
0
+201223433573
Query!
Fax
53322
0
Query!
Email
53322
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
53323
0
Sabry M. Amin
Query!
Address
53323
0
Assistant professor- Department of anesthesia & surgical intensive care
Faculty of medicine- Tanta university
Egypt- El-Geish street - Tanta city- 31527
Query!
Country
53323
0
Egypt
Query!
Phone
53323
0
+2012221793439
Query!
Fax
53323
0
Query!
Email
53323
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
53324
0
Sabry M. Amin
Query!
Address
53324
0
Assistant professor- Department of anesthesia & surgical intensive care
Faculty of medicine- Tanta university
Egypt- El-Geish street - Tanta city- 31527
Query!
Country
53324
0
Egypt
Query!
Phone
53324
0
+2012221793439
Query!
Fax
53324
0
Query!
Email
53324
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF