Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000113550
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/01/2015
Date registered
9/02/2015
Date last updated
7/06/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Gout Education: A Study of the Patient Experience
Query!
Scientific title
Gout Patients' Experiences with Patient Education Resources: A Qualitative, Focus Group Study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286040
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Gout
294017
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
294317
294317
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This research aims to identify the educational needs of New Zealanders suffering from gout, with particular attention paid to the unique needs of different social groups. We aim to determine ways that patient education can be encompassed in a package of care for gout patients. Focus groups with gout patients will be used to explore patients' experiences and perceptions of current care, and to explore new methods for encouraging patients to take their prescribed medications and make the lifestyle and dietary changes necessary for preventing gout attacks and reducing the risk of comorbidities. Patients who consent to participate will complete a questionnaire assessment of their gout history and treatment and will participate in a one-off focus group session lasting 2-3 hours. Health information for each patient will also be obtained through a brief GP questionnaire. Following study completion, this data will be used to develop educational resources within a package of care that is based upon health psychology models of behaviour to effectively encourage behaviour change. Particular focus will be given to the unique needs of different sociocultural groups, with the understanding that a “one size fits all” initiative may not be suitable for the diverse population of gout sufferers. Participants in the study will be Maori and non-Maori, as well as from urban and rural areas of New Zealand. It is anticipated that any resources developed for gout patients will need to be individually tailored for these diverse sociocultural groups. This research will provide the groundwork for improving health outcomes for people with gout, while also demonstrating the importance of taking a patient-centred approach and individualizing patient care initiatives based on social and cultural differences. The results of this research are expected to advance our understanding of the patient experience of gout as well as the strategies that will be most successful in improving their health outcomes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291026
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
None
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
294116
0
The primary outcome will be qualitative data describing the patient perspective on gout education and care. Patient perceptions will be assessed through the focus group sessions: all statements that participants write or verbalize (transcribed by the researcher) will be included in the analysis. The primary outcome will be the themes or common ideas that are present within the aggregate data. Too often resources and educational materials come from the health care provider perspective and we aim to contribute the gout patient perspective to shed light on how gout care can be improved. The results will provide the groundwork needed to later develop gout education materials and eventually a gout package of care.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294116
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294116
0
There will only be one study timepoint. Patients will participate in a one-off study session.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
312530
0
Our secondary outcome will be an understanding of the unique educational needs of gout patients from different sociocultural groups, such as Maori vs non-Maori and urban vs. rural. The demographic variables will be assessed through questionnaire measures and the importance of different themes related to gout education will be measured by participants' rankings of these ideas in the focus group sessions.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
312530
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
312530
0
There is only one study timepoint which is the one-off focus group session.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Diagnosis of gout; lives in Christchurch or Wairoa; NZ European or NZ Maori; able to attend a focus group session
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
The only exclusion criteria is patients who are unable to give consent.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Both
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Data saturation (no new themes identified) is achieved at relatively low sample size levels (minimum 15) and it is generally thought no more than 60 participants is required (Charmaz, 2006; Creswell, 1998). We will use 60 participants due to our use of 2 settings (30 participants per setting). All ideas generated at all stages of the focus groups (silent generation through group discussion) will be gathered. The data will thus consist of all written statements by patients (in silent generation) and by the researcher (during sharing of ideas and group discussion). The entire session will be audio-recorded and transcriptions of these sessions will be used if necessary (if the researcher is unable to record all ideas at the time of the session). Data analysis will be assisted by the NVivo software program. Inductive thematic analysis will be used to explore the research questions. This process involves extensive familiarization with the data, followed by the generation of initial codes and eventual grouping into overarching themes. Themes will be explored in relation to the 6 aspects of gout care: education, weight management, diet, footwear, co-morbidities, and medication. Additionally, patients will rank the ideas that come out of the discussion by identifying the 5 statements they agree with most. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) will then be used to identify any differences between subgroups in the importance of the issues raised. The subgroups we will explore are: Maori vs. non-Maori, urban vs. rural, young vs. old (based on mean split of sample), male vs. female, and short vs. long duration of illness (based on mean split of sample).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
16/02/2015
Query!
Actual
11/08/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/08/2016
Query!
Actual
4/05/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/05/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
70
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
6609
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
6609
0
Canterbury
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290626
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
290626
0
University of Otago
Query!
Address [1]
290626
0
Research & Enterprise
PO Box 56
Dunedin 9054
New Zealand
Query!
Country [1]
290626
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Prof Lisa Stamp
Query!
Address
PO Box 4345
Christchurch 8140
New Zealand
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289317
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
289317
0
Query!
Address [1]
289317
0
Query!
Country [1]
289317
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292258
0
Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292258
0
Ministry of Health Ethics Department Reception - Ground Floor 20 Aitken Street Thorndon WELLINGTON 6011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292258
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292258
0
26/01/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
292258
0
03/02/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292258
0
15/STH/9
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary goal of the present research is to identify the educational needs of New Zealanders suffering from gout, with particular attention paid to the unique needs of different social groups. We aim to determine ways that patient education can be encompassed in a package of care for gout patients. The present research will investigate three core questions: 1) What resources are gout patients currently lacking with regards to gout management? 2) Are there variations in the educational needs of patients with gout based on ethnicity (Maori versus non-Maori) or where they live (urban versus rural)? 3) How do gout patients want health information relayed to them, and does this depend on status as Maori/non-Maori or urban/rural? We hypothesize that Maori, non-Maori, rural, and urban New Zealanders will report some common and some unique barriers to gout management and will have differing levels of knowledge about self-management of gout. We also predict that these groups will differ in how they would prefer gout health information presented.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Treharne GJ, Richardson AC, Neha T, Fanning N, Janes R, Hudson B, Judd A, Pitama S, and Stamp LK. Education Preferences of People with Gout: Exploring Differences Between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Peoples from Rural and Urban Locations. Arthritis Care and Res 2017 doi: 10.1002/acr.23272
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
54366
0
Prof Lisa Stamp
Query!
Address
54366
0
University of Otago Christchurch
Department of Medicine
PO Box 4345
Christchurch 8140
Query!
Country
54366
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
54366
0
+64 03 3640253
Query!
Fax
54366
0
Query!
Email
54366
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
54367
0
Megan Johnston
Query!
Address
54367
0
Christchurch School of Medicine
Ground Floor, Parkside
Christchurch Hospital
Private Bag 4710
Christchurch 8140
Query!
Country
54367
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
54367
0
+64 03 3786487
Query!
Fax
54367
0
Query!
Email
54367
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
54368
0
Megan Johnston
Query!
Address
54368
0
Christchurch School of Medicine
Ground Floor, Parkside
Christchurch Hospital
Private Bag 4710
Christchurch 8140
Query!
Country
54368
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
54368
0
+64 03 3786487
Query!
Fax
54368
0
Query!
Email
54368
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF