Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000384550
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/04/2015
Date registered
27/04/2015
Date last updated
27/04/2015
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The benefit of targeted pharmacist education in reducing prescribing errors by junior doctors – a controlled trial.
Query!
Scientific title
The benefit of targeted pharmacist education in reducing prescribing errors by junior doctors – a controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286501
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
REPREP
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Prescribing errors
294715
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Other
295003
295003
0
0
Query!
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention (1): Regular prescribing feedback and targeted education of junior doctors by a clinical pharmacist, through three ten minute sessions per week for four weeks.
- These sessions were face-to-face with a clinical pharmacist, in a convenient ward space (eg meeting rooms), and were conducted as a group (3 interns, 1 registrar and the clinical pharmacist)
- One of the principle investigators collected data from the medication charts of the general medical wards, pertaining to the type and frequency of prescribing errors. This was discussed with the clinical pharmacist and the feedback/teaching sessions focussed on common prescribing errors seen on the wards, as well as dangerous prescribing errors recently identified.
Intervention (2): e-learning intervention whereby junior doctors completed the Australian National Prescribing Service’s (NPS) National Inpatient Medication Chart Training e-learning course.
- This e-learning course comprises 7 modules covering aspects of safe prescribing.
- The modules are estimated to take between 80-95 minutes to complete all together.
- E-learning intervention doctors were asked to complete the course between the end of the baseline data collection period and the start of the intervention data collection (over the weekend) and to show the investigators the certificate of completion.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291594
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No educational intervention.
2 General medical units in which the junior doctors received no intervention.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
294758
0
Prescribing error rate, calculated by dividing the total number of prescribing errors identified by the total number of medication orders written. We compared pre-intervention error rates to post-intervention error rates.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294758
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294758
0
3 weeks baseline data collected, 4 weeks of intervention data.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
313998
0
nil
Query!
Assessment method [1]
313998
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
313998
0
nil
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All junior doctors who were rotated onto general medicine at the time of the study participated, consisting of 12 interns and four registrars. All units were made aware of the study before it began, and doctors were informed that they were expected to participate as part of an ongoing quality assurance process.
There was no particular age limit for doctors to participate.
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
nil.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
All junior doctors who were rotated onto general medicine at the time of the study participated, consisting of 12 interns and four registrars. The unit each doctor was assigned to was pre-determined by the hospital as part of the usual junior doctor rotations.
All units were made aware of the study before it began, and doctors were informed that they were expected to participate as part of an ongoing quality assurance process. Consultants were not involved in the study. Each unit was randomised to an intervention, as described below.
Allocation was not concealed.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The four general medical units were randomised to two intervention groups (one unit each) and control groups (two units) using a random number generator and a pre-defined sequence of allocation. Each medical unit was known by its number (medical unit 1, medical unit 2, medical unit 3 and medical unit 4). We pre-defined a sequence of allocation of unit to intervention group as (in order) Intervention one, intervention two, control unit 1 and control unit 2. Using a random number generator to provide numbers between 1 and 4, we allocated the first intervention to the unit corresponding to the first number produced, the second unit to the second number produced, etc.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Statistical analysis was undertaken by chi-squared comparison of prescribing error rate for each group prior to, and following the intervention.
Our study objectives related to number of medication errors recorded rather than participant numbers. Based on a two-sided alpha value of 0.05 and 80% power to detect a 20% difference in error rate between the two periods (pre-intervention vs post-intervention: 40% vs 32%), we estimated that 589 medication orders were required per study group (a total of 1767). It was elected to collect data for longer than this number required due to the continuous nature of the pharmacist educational intervention.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
4/02/2014
Query!
Actual
4/02/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
21/03/2014
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
16
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
3686
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital - City campus - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
9511
0
3050 - Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
291068
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
291068
0
University of Melbourne - Provided funding for access to a statistical analysis program for the principle investigator, but provided no further funding for the project. There were no further funding sources.
Query!
Address [1]
291068
0
Parkville VIC 3010
Query!
Country [1]
291068
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Melbourne Hosptial
Query!
Address
300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289748
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
289748
0
Query!
Address [1]
289748
0
Query!
Country [1]
289748
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292651
0
Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292651
0
300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292651
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292651
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
292651
0
28/11/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292651
0
QA2013185
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Prescribing errors are a known cause of adverse patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of (1) targeted pharmacist feedback and education and (2) an e-learning prescribing module, on prescribing error rates by junior doctors in the inpatient general medical setting.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
nil to date.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
56406
0
Dr Jared Gursanscky
Query!
Address
56406
0
Via Melbourne health: 300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Country
56406
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
56406
0
+61450504674
Query!
Fax
56406
0
Query!
Email
56406
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
56407
0
Jared Gursanscky
Query!
Address
56407
0
Via Melbourne health: 300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Country
56407
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
56407
0
+61 (03) 9342 7000
Query!
Fax
56407
0
Query!
Email
56407
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
56408
0
Jared Gursanscky
Query!
Address
56408
0
Via Melbourne health: 300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Country
56408
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
56408
0
+61 (03) 9342 7000
Query!
Fax
56408
0
Query!
Email
56408
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF