Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615001004550
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
4/06/2015
Date registered
25/09/2015
Date last updated
19/01/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Effects of sugar-sweetened drinks on psychological and metabolic outcomes.
Query!
Scientific title
Possible effects on healthy young adults of sugar- and artificially-sweetened drinks in terms of psychological and metabolic outcomes
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286782
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1170-4543
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Posible metabolic and psychological effects of sugar drink consumption
295159
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Diet and Nutrition
295395
295395
0
0
Query!
Other diet and nutrition disorders
Query!
Metabolic and Endocrine
295396
295396
0
0
Query!
Diabetes
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants are randomly assigned to 3 arms: (1) Sugar group: 4.5L of sugar-sweetened drink per week; (2) Diet group: 4.5L of artificially-sweetened drink per week; (3) Water group: 4.5L of bottled water. Intervention is for 12 weeks. During this period all participants are required to abstain from consuming sweetened drinks other than those given to them.
Notes:
1. a) The sugar-sweetened drinks will be commercially available carbonated beverages with sucrose content in the range 9% - 11%. Participants in this arm will be offered a choice between CocaCola, PepsiCola, Sprite and Fanta.
Participants in the Diet arm will be offered a choice between the equivalent sugar-free commercial beverages; e.g. Diet Coke, Coke Zero, Diet Pepsi, Sprite Light, which contain artificial sweeteners that can include aspartame, sucralose or stevia, or some combination.
b) Participants will be asked to consume no more than 3 of the 375-ml cans per day; otherwise it is up to them to decide when to consume their drink.
c) Monitoring of adherence to drinking all 12 cans each week consists of: 1.requiring that participants return the empty cans when they come to collect the next week's supply; and 2. reporting each week what beverages they have consumed in the previous week by completing the Brief 15-item Beverage Questionnaire (BEVQ-15) on each visit to the laboratory.
2. Participants are not asked to change their normal diet other than comply with the instructions on beverages; i.e. there are no further dietary restrictions.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291937
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Intervention code [2]
292453
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
As indicated above, the Control treatment is to provide these participants with bottled water (Water group).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
295138
0
Change in cognitive function as measured by neuropsychological tests: the Logical Memory test and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
295138
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
295138
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) at the start of the intervention to the Midway test 6 weeks later, to the Completion test 12 weeks after the start of the intervention, with a Follow up test approximately 12 weeks after the Completion test.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
295139
0
Waist circumference
Query!
Assessment method [2]
295139
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
295139
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) at the start of the intervention to the Midway test 6 weeks later, to the Completion test 12 weeks after the start of the intervention, with a Follow up test approximately 12 weeks after the Completion test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
314838
0
Body mass index (BMI).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
314838
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
314838
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) at the start of the intervention to the Midway test 6 weeks later, to the Completion test 12 weeks after the start of the intervention, with a Follow up test approximately 12 weeks after the Completion test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
314839
0
Go/No go test for response inhibition (GNG).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
314839
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
314839
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) at the start of the intervention to the Midway test 6 weeks later, to the Completion test 12 weeks after the start of the intervention, with a Follow up test approximately 12 weeks after the Completion test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
316414
0
Change in metabolic function as measured by an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) in which blood sugar levels are measured at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after consumption of 50g of glucose (dissolved in tap water) within 5 min.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
316414
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
316414
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) at start of intervention to the Completion test 12 weeks later. NB The OGTT will not be administered in the Midway test or the Follow up test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
316415
0
Total body fat, as measured by Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
316415
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
316415
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) at the start of the intervention to the Midway test 6 weeks later, to the Completion test 12 weeks after the start of the intervention, with a Follow up test approximately 12 weeks after the Completion test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
316416
0
Sweetness preference test
Query!
Assessment method [5]
316416
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
316416
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) to Completion test 12 weeks later.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
316461
0
Blood pressure
Query!
Assessment method [6]
316461
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
316461
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) at the start of the intervention to the Midway test 6 weeks later, to the Completion test 12 weeks after the start of the intervention, with a Follow test approximately 12 weeks after the Completion test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
316462
0
Biochemical assays of fasting blood sample, including blood glucose, triglyceride, cholesterol and uric acid levels.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
316462
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
316462
0
Change from baseline (Initial test) to Completion test 12 weeks later.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Healthy volunteers in the age range 18-35 years and with BMI in range 17.5-30 who regularly drink at least 2L of sugar-sweetened drinks per week.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
35
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Previous or current eating-related disorder; current mental health diagnosis; diabetic; food allergies or other disorder affecting either diet or memory
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
If an initial phone call indicates that a potential participant meets the above criteria, s/he is invited to a screening session that includes measurement of BMI and blood pressure. If these and a further health questionnaire fail to reveal any health risk, then s/he is booked for Test session 1 (Baseline). Neither participants nor researchers will know which arm a potential participant will be allocated to until after a decision about eligibility has been made.
Provisional allocation of a participant to an arm will be made on arrival for Test session 1. Block randomisation will use a random number generator for each blocks of 6 participants (2 for each group).
This process will be constrained by attempting to match the groups in terms of 4 participant characteristics; in order of priority these are : 1. BMI; 2. Initial report of sugar-sweetened beverage intake, as measured by the Hedricks BEVQ-15; 3. Proportion of sweet energy-rich foods in their normal diet, as measured by the DFS short questionnaire; 4. Gender. It may well turn out to be impossible to stratify for more than the first two factors.
Allocation is not concealed.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Provisional allocation of a participant to an arm will be made on arrival for Test session 1. Participants will be randomised in blocks of 6 (2 for each group), with the order within each block determined by a random number generator.
This process will be constrained by attempting to match the groups in terms of 4 participant characteristics; in order of priority these are:
1) BMI;
2) Initial report of sugar-sweetened beverage intake, as measured by the Hedricks BEVQ-15;
3) Proportion of sweet energy-rich foods in their normal diet, as measured by the DFS short questionnaire;
4. Gender.
It may well turn out to be impossible to stratify for more than the first two factors.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
In a convenience sample, Francis and Stevenson (2011) found that a self-reported HFHS diet reduced performance on the Logical Memory test relative to a self-reported LFS diet with an effect size of d=0.81. In order for us to have 80% power to detect a significant effect of our dietary intervention of a slightly more conservative effect size of d=.70 and with a=.05 (two-tailed), a sample size of 34 per group is required. Based on Maersk et al’s (2012) dietary intervention, we anticipate an attrition rate of 33%. Therefore, we will aim to recruit and randomise a total of 153 participants to achieve a final sample of 34 per group.
Analyses will be conducted per protocol on those participants who complete the first three tests. (Since a high drop out rate is expected for the final, 'follow up' test, data from this test will be treated separately.) If a particular participant has less than 5% missing data, then s/he will be considered a 'completer' and the missing data will be imputed via multiple imputation. Per protocol analysis is chosen because the study aims to assess the effects of the consumption of the three drinks and this requires that the participants actually consume the drinks that have been allocated to them.
The primary outcome, Logical Memory, will be analysed at Test 2, Test 3 and Test 4, separately via ANCOVAs, controlling for baseline Logical Memory scores (at Test 1).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2016
Query!
Actual
11/04/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/09/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/03/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
153
Query!
Accrual to date
100
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
9760
0
2006 - The University Of Sydney
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
291410
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
291410
0
Australian Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
291410
0
GPO Box 2702
CANBERRA
ACT 2601
AUSTRALIA
Query!
Country [1]
291410
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Professor Robert Boakes
Query!
Address
School of Psychology (A18),
University of Sydney,
NSW 2006,
Australia.
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
290086
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
290086
0
University of Sydney
Query!
Address [1]
290086
0
University of Sydney,
Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country [1]
290086
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292958
0
University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292958
0
Research Office, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292958
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292958
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
292958
0
17/04/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292958
0
2015/074
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
292959
0
Sydney Local Health District Clinical Trials Subcommittee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
292959
0
Research Development Office, Level 8, Building 14, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
292959
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
292959
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
292959
0
16/02/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
292959
0
X14-0366
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Background. Various lines of evidence indicate that negative metabolic consequences follow when a person regularly drinks a large quantity of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). What is not known is whether SSBs also produce negative psychological effects, such as impairments in short-term memory and increased impulsiveness. Switching from SSBs to ‘diet’ beverages (non-nutritive sweetened beverages; NSBs) would seem to offer a relatively easy dietary change. However, it has been claimed that this can be counter-productive in at least some circumstances. Aims. 1. To test whether SSB consumption produces impairment on psychological tests, relative to NSB consumption and a water control condition; 2. To test whether the effects of NSB consumption depends on other aspects of a person’s diet (e.g. consumption of sweet energy-rich foods). Design. In a non-blinded 3-group parallel design over a 12-week period the Sugar group is given SSBs, the Diet group is given NSBs and the Water group is given water. Metabolic and cognitive/behavioural measures are taken at the outset of the intervention (Initial test), after 6 weeks (Midway test), at the end of the intervention (Completion test) and approximately 12 weeks later (Follow up test). Main predictions: 1. In the Completion test the primary psychological outcome measure, scores on the Logical Memory test, will be lower in the Sugar group than in the other two groups. 2. In the Completion test the primary metabolic outcome, waist:hip ratio will be larger in the Sugar group than in the other two groups.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
546
546
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/368612-1506BoakesSugarDrinkProtocolRevsn5.docx
(Protocol)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [2]
1410
1410
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/368612-1701SugarDrinkProtocolRevsn3plusFooter.docx
(Protocol)
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
57506
0
Prof Robert A. Boakes
Query!
Address
57506
0
School of Psychology (A18),
University of Sydney,
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
57506
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
57506
0
(612) 9351 3347
Query!
Fax
57506
0
Query!
Email
57506
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
57507
0
Robert A. Boakes
Query!
Address
57507
0
School of Psychology (A18),
University of Sydney,
Sydney
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
57507
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
57507
0
(612) 9351 3347
Query!
Fax
57507
0
Query!
Email
57507
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
57508
0
Robert A. Boakes
Query!
Address
57508
0
School of Psychology (A18),
University of Sydney,
Sydney
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
57508
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
57508
0
(612) 9351 3347
Query!
Fax
57508
0
(612) 9351 2603
Query!
Email
57508
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
Type
Is Peer Reviewed?
DOI
Citations or Other Details
Attachment
Plain language summary
No
The results are currently being prepared for publi...
[
More Details
]
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Switching from Sugar- to Artificially-Sweetened Beverages: A 12-Week Trial.
2023
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15092191
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF