Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616001258448
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/07/2016
Date registered
8/09/2016
Date last updated
31/10/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Randomised controlled trial comparing cutting seton vs ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for complex anal fistula
Query!
Scientific title
Randomised control trial comparing clinical outcome of adult patients with anal fistulae treated with cutting seton or LIFT procedure
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286947
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anal fistulae
295385
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
295648
295648
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
299756
299756
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention : Cutting seton
Cutting seton will be placed through the fistula track with the aid of Lockhart-Mummery. The anoderm overlying the sphincter complex will be scored with diathermy and the vessel loop secured snugly with suture ties. This duration of this procedure is approximately 45 minutes and will be performed by consultant colorectal surgeon. Patients will be reviewed every 6 weeks, and readmitted for tightening of the seton at a minimum of 6 weekly intervals until completion of treatment.
Completion of treatment is when the seton has cut through the sphincter . This decision is made by the treating Surgeon.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
292142
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Comparator treatment: LIFT procedure
An incision is performed in the intersphincteric groove. The primary fistula tract is dissected out and isolated. The track is ligated and where possible, a section excised for histopathology. Where possible, the external track lateral to the sphincter complex is either excised or curetted. The duration of this procedure is approximateley 45 minutes and will be performed by consultant colorectal surgeon.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
298924
0
Primary healing rate: defined as complete healing of the fistula track and external opening.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
298924
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
298924
0
12 weeks post surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
326517
0
Secondary healing rate: defined as healing after second line therapy.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
326517
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
326517
0
12 months post second line therapy
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
326518
0
Recurrence: defined as any new onset of symptoms and an external fistula opening after documented complete healing identified by consultant colorectal surgeon.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
326518
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
326518
0
6 months and 12 months post therapy
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
326519
0
Continence: this will be assessed using the St Mark’s continence severity score.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
326519
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
326519
0
6weeks, 12weeks, 18weeks, 6 months and 12 months post therapy
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
326520
0
Anorectal physiology measures: anal manometry measured by stationery water perfused catheter. Endoanal ultrasound using B&K 3000 3d rotating anal transducer.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
326520
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
326520
0
pre operatively and 12 weeks post healing
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
326523
0
Time to primary healing: defined as complete healing of the fistula track and external opening.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
326523
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
326523
0
6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 6 months, 12 months post operative
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
326524
0
Pain as measured on a visual analogue scale.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
326524
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
326524
0
6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks 6 months and 12 months postoperative
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
326526
0
Stoma requirement as a result of treatment failure. This will be assessed by review of medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
326526
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
326526
0
12 months post operative
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
326527
0
Patient satisfaction measured on a visual analogue scale
Query!
Assessment method [8]
326527
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
326527
0
6weeks, 12 weeks, 18weeks, 6 months and 12 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
326529
0
Patient quality of life measured by questionnaire SF -12
Query!
Assessment method [9]
326529
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
326529
0
Preoperatively and 12 months.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Adult patients aged 18-80 years with complex anal fistula. Complex fistulae are defined as high trans-sphincteric or supra-sphincteric fistulae, anteriorly situated fistulae in women, fistula disease in the presence of impaired continence, and any recurrent fistula.
Current loose seton in situ for drainage of sepsis
Able to give valid consent
Deemed suitable for either LIFT or cutting seton procedure by treating surgeon
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Current active inflammatory bowel disease or known history of inflammatory bowel disease.
Fistulae not of cryptoglandular aetiology (e.g. radiation, foreign body, iatrogenic)
Multiple medical co-morbidities
Deemed unsuitable by the treating surgeon for either cutting seton or LIFT procedure
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
There will be no allocation concealment.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomisation will be computer generated. Entrance into the randomisation will be preceded by stratification according to gender ( male or female) and previous anal fistula (yes or no).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Consecutive patients will be allocated to either LIFT or cutting seton by computer generated randomisation. Prior to randomisation, participants will be stratified according to gender and previous fistula procedures yes or no. Randomisation will be administered by an independent person.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Primary analysis will be at 3 months and longitudinal analysis will be 6 and 12 months and take into account secondary outcomes and correlated to patients. Repeated measures will be analysed using ANOVA with mixed modeling principles. Effects ( fixed and random) will be specified and estimated to identify which mechanisms and the degree to which they affected outcomes.
Descriptive analysis will be used to calculate mean, median and report 95% confidence intervals. Differences in continuous normally distributed data will be calculated using a t test. Differences in categorical variable will be calculated using Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxin sign ranks test. Multivariate and univariate analysis will be performed and significance will be set at 0.05.
From current literature, the median rate of primary healing is 71% and 98.5% for LIFT and cutting seton, respectively. Using Pocock’s formula comparing two proportions in a randomised clinical trial with a difference of 20%, significance of 0.05 and rate of 30%, the number of patients in each group is determined to be 93. Allowing for dropouts, the total number to be recruited into the study will be 200 patients.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/09/2016
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/12/2021
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
29/07/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
200
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
6155
0
St George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
6156
0
Prince of Wales Private Hospital - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
13595
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
13698
0
2031 - Randwick
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
294259
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
294259
0
St George Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
294259
0
Gray Street
KOGARAH NSW 2217
Query!
Country [1]
294259
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
St George Hospital Colorectal research fund
Query!
Address
Pelvic Floor Unit
Gray Street
Kogarah NSW 2217
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
293090
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
293090
0
None
Query!
Address [1]
293090
0
None
Query!
Country [1]
293090
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
295463
0
SESLHD Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
295463
0
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Prince of Wales Hospital G71 East Wing, Edmund Blacket Building Cnr High & Avoca Streets Randwick NSW 2031
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
295463
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
295463
0
29/09/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
295463
0
26/07/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
295463
0
15/2389HREC/15/POWH/446
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Anal fistula is a common condition. The aims of treatment are fistula healing, prevention of recurrence and maintenance of continence. Treatment options and their associated risks vary according to the fistula track. Simple fistulae (intersphincteric or low trans-sphincteric) may be treated successfully with fistulotomy. Complex fistulae pose a therapeutic challenge and carry a higher risk of treatment failure, altered continence and recurrence. (Joy and Williams 2002) (van okelen, Gosselink et al. 2013) To date, no single intervention simultaneously fulfils all three therapeutic aims. The cutting seton has been employed for centuries and involves the use of various materials (including suture, vessel loops etc) to slowly divide through the sphincter and induce fibrosis. The literature reports recurrence rates in the 3 – 5 % range (Vial, Pares et al. 2010) . Reported incontinence rates after cutting seton vary widely from 0 - 63 % (Vial, Pares et al. 2010) (Garcia-Aguilar, Belmonte et al. 1998) (Karri-Pekka, Hamalainen et al. 1997) (Charua-Guindic, Mendez-Moran et al. 2007) (Ritchie, Sackier et al. 2008) , which may be partially attributable to incomplete/inadequate scarring behind the seton when tightened rapidly. The ligation of the intersphincteric track (LIFT) procedure was described in 2007 as a sphincter preserving technique for high fistulae. (Rojanasakul, Pattanaarun et al. 2007) Early reports published fistula cure and continence rates in excess of 90% (ref). Subsequent series have reported success rates ranging from 57% to 82%. (Yassin, Hammond et al. 2013) The procedure involves identification, dissection and then ligation of the fistula track in the intersphincteric space, thereby eliminating the fistula source from its track and avoiding the need for sphincter division. Multiple interventions to manage fistulae have been described including sphincter preserving techniques such as fibrin plugs and tissue glue. (Ellis and Clark 2006) (Garg 2009) With the prospect of altered continence as a complication, heterogeneity of fistula anatomy, and the interplay with physiology, studies are limited in their ability to generalise findings and recommend treatments in the form of guidelines. Aim To prospectively assess the clinical outcomes of patients with complex fistulae treated by cutting seton and compare these to patients treated by LIFT.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
58226
0
Dr Kim Chi Phan Thien
Query!
Address
58226
0
Sydney Colorectal Assc
37 Gloucester Rd
Hurstville NSW 2220
Query!
Country
58226
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
58226
0
+61 2 85661000
Query!
Fax
58226
0
+61 2 91133546
Query!
Email
58226
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
58227
0
Vicki Patton
Query!
Address
58227
0
Pelvic Floor Unit
St George Hospital
Gray Street
KOGARAH NSW 2217
Query!
Country
58227
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
58227
0
+61 2 91132715
Query!
Fax
58227
0
+61 2 9113 3546
Query!
Email
58227
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
58228
0
Kim Chi Phan Thien
Query!
Address
58228
0
Sydney Colorectal Assc
37 Gloucester Rd
Hurstville NSW 2220
Query!
Country
58228
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
58228
0
+61285661000
Query!
Fax
58228
0
+61 2 9113 3546
Query!
Email
58228
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF