Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000783527
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/07/2015
Date registered
28/07/2015
Date last updated
1/07/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A comparison of the new laryngeal mask airway (LMA), LMA-Protector with the LMA-Supreme in surgical patients requiring airway management with an LMA.
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of the LMA-Protector versus the LMA-Supreme on correct fit and positioning in surgical patients requiring LMA airway management.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287059
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1172-0054
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Airway management
295551
0
Query!
Oropharyngeal leak pressure
295552
0
Query!
Downfolding of epiglottis
295553
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
295823
295823
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Surgery
295951
295951
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Public Health
295952
295952
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The LMA-Protector is a new single-use, silicone, TGA- approved device that has similar features to other LMAs made of PVC. The silicone composition of the LMA-Protector makes it very flexible and the device allows access to and functional separation of the ventilation and digestive tracts with 2 drainage channels. Its use involves insertion under anaesthesia and inflation of the cuff once correct position in the hypopharynx is achieved. Duration of use is from the start of general anaesthesia to the end of the surgical procedure, and total time is dependent on the surgical procedure. The anaesthetist will administer the intervention and record a log of use time.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
292291
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Standard treatment is the single-use LMA device, the LMA-Supreme made of PVC with a drain tube to separate the ventilation and digestive tracts and a strong inner cuff to prevent airway obstruction. Use of both the LMA- Protector and the control LMA-Supreme involves insertion under anaesthesia and inflation of the cuff once correct position in the hypopharynx is achieved. Duration of use for each device is from the start of general anaesthesia to the end of the surgical procedure, with total time dependent on the surgical procedure. The anaesthetist will administer the intervention or the control treatment and record a log of use time.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
295516
0
Oropharyngeal leak pressure assessed by detection of audible noise by neck stethoscopy.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
295516
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
295516
0
On device insertion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
315742
0
Anatomical position of the device in the hypopharynx is assessed by the anaesthetist.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
315742
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
315742
0
On device insertion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
315743
0
Whether the correct size of the device is used as assessed by the anaesthetist.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
315743
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
315743
0
On device insertion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
315744
0
Whether the epiglottis is downfolded, as assessed by the anaesthetist.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
315744
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
315744
0
On device insertion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
315745
0
Manoeuvers needed to adjust malplacement as assessed by the anaesthetist.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
315745
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
315745
0
On device insertion.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
American Society of Anesthesiology physical status grade 1-3 and scheduled elective surgery under general anaesthesia.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients who are pregnant, at risk of aspiration of gastric contents, requiring surgery in a position other than supine, undergoing head and neck surgery, or need endotracheal intubation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Randomised controlled single-blinded trial. Allocation concealment performed by contacting the holder of the allocation schedule on computer at central administration site.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomisation schedule was created using Stata software for the 2-treatment study, and saved as a Microsoft Excel file. Using 2 block sizes, the block identity number (blockid), number of patients in each block (blocksize) and each recruited patient’s sequence within their block (SeqInBlk) are recorded. Two treatment arms are labelled “protector” or “supreme”. Patients are allocated in the ratio 1:1 to these two treatments.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Statistical power of the oropharyngeal leak test was evaluated on a continuous scale at which each patient’s oropharyngeal leak was detected, as modelled from a meta-analysis in this subject area published by Maitra et al in 2014. This study provided data to allow assumption that the oropharyngeal leak pressure within each subject group would be normally distributed with standard deviation 5 cm H2O. Based on this data, the participant number of 100 was selected. With 50 interventional participants and 50 controls, this provides comparison with a probability (power) of 80% to detect this difference, with a 2-tailed type I error of 0.05. Analysis of the difference between the means and descriptive analyses of demographic data and risk factors will be performed. Risk difference and risk ratio of the two groups will be calculated. Intention to treat methodology will be followed.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2015
Query!
Actual
1/08/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
23/06/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
23/06/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
100
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
4022
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
9944
0
4029 - Royal Brisbane Hospital
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
291619
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
291619
0
Query!
Address [1]
291619
0
Query!
Country [1]
291619
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Query!
Address
Butterfield Street, Herston QLD 4029
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
290292
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
290292
0
University of Queensland
Query!
Address [1]
290292
0
St Lucia Qld 4072
Query!
Country [1]
290292
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
293151
0
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Human Reseaerch Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
293151
0
Butterfield Street, Herston. QLD 4029
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
293151
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
293151
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
293151
0
15/06/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
293151
0
HREC/15/QRBW/248
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In this study we are comparing two laryngeal mask airways (LMAs), a current model which is commonly used with the latest model of the device for flexibility, traumatic effect and ease of optimal positioning. We are performing a randomised controlled study to find out which device performs better in clinical practice. We are randomly selecting people to the groups and giving each a different device. The results will be compared to see if one is better. There is a 50:50 chance of being in one group or the other.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
58674
0
Prof Andre van Zundert
Query!
Address
58674
0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Butterfield Street, Herston. QLD 4029
Query!
Country
58674
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
58674
0
+617 36465673
Query!
Fax
58674
0
+617 36461308
Query!
Email
58674
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
58675
0
Heather Reynolds
Query!
Address
58675
0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Butterfield Street, Herston. QLD 4029
Query!
Country
58675
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
58675
0
+617 36465453
Query!
Fax
58675
0
+617 36461308
Query!
Email
58675
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
58676
0
Andre van Zundert
Query!
Address
58676
0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Butterfield Street, Herston. QLD 4029
Query!
Country
58676
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
58676
0
+617 36465673
Query!
Fax
58676
0
+617 36461308
Query!
Email
58676
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme and LMA-Protector.
2020
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00301-3
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF