Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615001213538
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
30/08/2015
Date registered
6/11/2015
Date last updated
24/01/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
24/01/2020
Type of registration
N/A
Titles & IDs
Public title
Ultrasound in the second stage of labour for fetal position – a randomised controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
Evaluation of the clinical examination versus use of ultrasound with the clinical examination for assessing fetal head position on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women having a vacuum assisted birth.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287375
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
suction cup malposition
296061
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
296325
296325
0
0
Query!
Childbirth and postnatal care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Digital vaginal examination will be as per current care.
The ultrasound will be performed by a senior obstetrician using a hand held transducer on the maternal abdomen to assess fetal head position. The procedure would take no more than a couple of minutes. Adherence will be noted on the study sheet completed for all women having a vacuum birth.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
292720
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control group: current care that involves assessment by abdominal and digital vaginal examination prior to instrumental delivery. The clinician will notify the midwife of the fetal position prior to the vacuum and who will record the position on the chart provided as either direct OA or OP, left OA, right OA, left OP and right OP, left OT or right OT position. The rest of the information will be as is routinely collected on the instrumental delivery form currently used in the unit.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
295979
0
i) Position of the baby as assessed by the midwife ascribing the vacuum birth
Query!
Assessment method [1]
295979
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
295979
0
This will be assessed at time of birth
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
296033
0
ii). Position of the cup placement noted at birth – this will be noted from the instrument markings on the neonatal head by the paediatric Registrar who is always present at these births
Query!
Assessment method [2]
296033
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
296033
0
This will be assessed at time of birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
317087
0
i). a composite outcome:
a. Neonatal trauma (bruising, laceration, cephalohaematoma, su bgaleal haemorrhage, retinal haemorrhage) as assessed by the paediatric Registrar
b. fetal acidosis (arterial pH below 7.10 and base excess greater than-12.0 mmol)
c. admission to the neonatal unit.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
317087
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
317087
0
At time of birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
317293
0
ii). Maternal: compare the incidence of>3 pulls- each pull is recorded by the scriber during the procedure with time of application of each pull as well
Query!
Assessment method [2]
317293
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
317293
0
At time o fbirth
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
317294
0
iii). number of pop offs - as recorded by scriber present during procedure
Query!
Assessment method [3]
317294
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
317294
0
At time of birth-
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
317295
0
iv). Third and fourth degree perineal tears- a mandatory requirement when perineum is examined after procedure on the assisted birth template
Query!
Assessment method [4]
317295
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
317295
0
Immediately after birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
317296
0
v). Maternal satisfaction of the instrumental delivery process.- assessed using a simple survey form with Likert scale
Query!
Assessment method [5]
317296
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
317296
0
The day following the birth by a member of the Research team.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
318703
0
Sequential use of instruments - as recorded by the scriber present during the procedure
Query!
Assessment method [6]
318703
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
318703
0
At time of birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
318704
0
caesarean section for failed instrumental delivery - as recorded in teh birth Register
Query!
Assessment method [7]
318704
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
318704
0
Immediately after birth
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Gestational age 37 weeks or above, singleton, cephalic presentation and need for instrumental delivery.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Need for urgent delivery for fetal distress.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation: Allocation to intervention or the control group will be by opening a sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelope that will contain the allocation. Randomisation will be concealed in serially numbered sealed opaque envelopes kept locked in the ward and only opened immediately before a decision has been made to perform a vacuum birth and after recording the name and UR number of the participant in the research register. After randomisation the participant will remain in that group irrespective of the actual method used for of induction; intention-to-treat.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation will be done by using a computer generated list of random numbers with a variable block size.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
a. Sample size - If we assume the rate of inaccurate diagnosis (difference of more than 45 degrees) to be 20% in the control group based on previous studies, to demonstrate a rate of incorrect diagnosis of 5% in the intervention group, we would require 175 women in each group to have a power of 80% at an alpha value of 5%.
b. Data analysis and reporting will proceed according to CONSORT guidelines for randomised controlled trials, and will be conducted blinded to group status by the trial researcher. All analyses will use appropriate regression models, with results presented Relative risks with their respective 95% confidence intervals
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Withdrawn
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Lack of funding/staff/facilities
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
350
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
4276
0
Ipswich Hospital - Ipswich
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
291937
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
291937
0
Query!
Address [1]
291937
0
Query!
Country [1]
291937
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
kassam mahomed
Query!
Address
Ipswich Hospital
1 Chelmsford Avenue
Ipswich
Qld. 4305
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
290607
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
290607
0
Query!
Address [1]
290607
0
Query!
Country [1]
290607
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
293438
0
West Moreton District HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
293438
0
Human Research Ethics Committee EC00184 The Park – Centre for Mental Health Locked Bag 500 Sumner Park BC, QLD 4074
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
293438
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
293438
0
20/07/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
293438
0
21/08/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
293438
0
HREC/15/QMWS/16
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
A RCT to compare clinical examination alone versus clinical examination and ultrasound for accuracy of fetal head position prior to vacuum birth.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
59930
0
A/Prof Kassam mahomed
Query!
Address
59930
0
Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Ipswich Hospital
1 Chelmsford Avenue
Ipswich
Qld 4305.
Query!
Country
59930
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
59930
0
+61738101111
Query!
Fax
59930
0
Query!
Email
59930
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
59931
0
Kassam Mahomed
Query!
Address
59931
0
Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Ipswich Hospital
1 Chelmsford Avenue
Ipswich
Qld 4305.
Query!
Country
59931
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
59931
0
+61738101111
Query!
Fax
59931
0
Query!
Email
59931
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
59932
0
Kassam mahomed
Query!
Address
59932
0
Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Ipswich Hospital
1 Chelmsford Avenue
Ipswich
Qld 4305.
Query!
Country
59932
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
59932
0
+61738101111
Query!
Fax
59932
0
Query!
Email
59932
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF