Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615001170516
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
3/10/2015
Date registered
2/11/2015
Date last updated
16/06/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Can Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles be implemented in an Australian healthcare setting to improve patient recovery after total hip replacement (THR)?
Query!
Scientific title
Prospective interventional trial using a ‘before-and-after’ design with historical controls to compare the recovery after THR of the standard care group of patients to the ERAS group of patients, as measured by Quality of Recovery-15 score.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287594
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
RECOVER
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
total hip replacement
296394
0
Query!
total hip arthroplasty
296395
0
Query!
anaesthesia
296396
0
Query!
recovery after anaesthesia
296397
0
Query!
perioperative medicine
296398
0
Query!
postoperative analgesia
296399
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
296666
296666
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Anaesthesiology
296667
296667
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Musculoskeletal
296668
296668
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The exposed group is the group of patients undergoing THR with ERAS principles of care (October 2015 to April 2016).
The ERAS 'bundle' consists of several measures to be implemented
1. Preoperative patient information regarding the ERAS bundle. A leaflet will be given to patients by the surgeon at the time of booking for surgery.
2. Reduced fasting from clear fluids preoperatively (from midnight of the day of surgery, to 2 hours preoperative)
3. Reduced fasting from clear fluids postoperatively (from 4 hours after surgery, to 'as soon as awake and tolerating oral fluids').
4. Anaesthetic technique to reduce postoperative drowsiness (spinal and propofol sedation or general anaesthesia)
5. Intraoperative antiemetics (dexamethasone 4mg intravenously and granisetron 1mg intravenously)
6. Use of forced air warmer ('Cocoon' forced air warming blanket over nonoperative part of patient) and fluid warmer ('Hotline' fluid warmer to warm intravenous fluids) intraoperatively.
7. Cefazolin 2g intravenously at least 15 minutes preincision
8. Regular postoperative multimodal oral analgesia (Panadol Osteo 2 tablets 8 hourly, meloxicam 15mg daily, Targin 10/5 or 20/10 twice daily) until no longer required for postoperative pain relief. Other oral analgesics as required.
9. Regular postoperative antiemetics for 24 hours (5HT-antagonist of choice - either granisetron 1mg intravenously twice daily or ondansetron 4mg intravenously twice daily).
10. Regular postoperative aperients (coloxyl with senna 2 tablets orally twice daily) until no longer required.
11. Clexane 40mg subcutaneously daily, for 21 days postoperatively.
12. Standardised mobilisation physiotherapy plan:
Day 0 – mobilise on frame with physiotherapist
Day 1 – mobilise on elbow crutches with physiotherapist, sit out of bed, shower with/without assistance
Day 2 – independently mobilise with elbow crutches >50m, independent self-care activities
Day 3 – independently transfer and mobilise with elbow crutches >100m, have a clear understanding of post-discharge progression of ambulation/exercise program and hip precautions. If applicable, independent with stairs and car transfers.
* duration of each session is approximately 20 minutes, however will vary according to patient's ability to mobilise (varies with pain, nausea, dizziness). Data regarding factors that inhibit mobilisation will be collected.
We will measure the implementation of the ERAS bundle (data collection as a process outcome on the Case Report Form) and whether implementation has improved patient recovery (Quality of Recovery-15 score).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
292994
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
293082
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [3]
293083
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The comparator group is the group of patients undergoing THR with standard care (January to September 2015).
Standard care received:
1. Inconsistent preoperative patient information
2. Fasting from oral fluids from 6-18 hours preoperatively.
3. Postoperative oral intake commencing from 4-6 hours postoperatively.
4. Occasional use of intraoperative antiemetics
5. A wide range of prescribed postoperative analgesia, e.g. paracetamol and antiinflammatories only as required, intramuscular or intravenous morphine
6. Postoperative antiemetics given as required, but infrequently.
7. Postoperative laxatives given too late e.g. postoperative day 5.
Query!
Control group
Historical
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
296275
0
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR15) score - a commonly used and validated score to assess global domains of early postoperative quality of recovery. It consists of 15 questions on the patient’s health status in the past 24 hours, each answered by patient self-report on a scale of 0-10 to give a total score out of 150. The questions are ‘able to breath easily’, ‘been able to enjoy food’, ‘feeling rested’, ‘have had a good sleep’, ‘able to look after personal toilet and hygiene unaided’, ‘able to communicate with family or friends’, ‘getting support from hospital doctors and nurses’, able to return to work or usual home activities’, ‘feeling comfortable and in control’, ‘having a feeling of general well-being’, ‘moderate pain’, ‘severe pain’, ‘nausea or vomiting’, ‘feeling worried or anxious’, and ‘feeling sad or depressed’.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
296275
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
296275
0
6 weeks postoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
318025
0
Numerical Rating Score (NRS) assessing the NRS as 0 = worst pain at rest and on movement to 10 = no pain at rest and on movement.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
318025
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
318025
0
Postoperative day 1, postoperative day 2, postoperative week 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
318026
0
Analgesia and morphine equivalent consumption - assessed by review of drug chart
Query!
Assessment method [2]
318026
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
318026
0
Postoperative day 1 and 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
318027
0
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR15) score - a commonly used and validated score to assess global domains of early postoperative quality of recovery. It consists of 15 questions on the patient’s health status in the past 24 hours, each answered by patient self-report on a scale of 0-10 to give a total score out of 150. The questions are ‘able to breath easily’, ‘been able to enjoy food’, ‘feeling rested’, ‘have had a good sleep’, ‘able to look after personal toilet and hygiene unaided’, ‘able to communicate with family or friends’, ‘getting support from hospital doctors and nurses’, able to return to work or usual home activities’, ‘feeling comfortable and in control’, ‘having a feeling of general well-being’, ‘moderate pain’, ‘severe pain’, ‘nausea or vomiting’, ‘feeling worried or anxious’, and ‘feeling sad or depressed’.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
318027
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
318027
0
postoperative day 1 and 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
318028
0
Mobility as assessed by the 10 Metre Walk Test - time taken to complete the 10 metre walk test measured in minutes and seconds by the treating physiotherapist
Query!
Assessment method [4]
318028
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
318028
0
postoperative day 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
318029
0
hospital length of stay - from hospital's inpatient electronic database.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
318029
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
318029
0
day of discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
318030
0
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 12 item version 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
318030
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
318030
0
6 weeks postoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
318031
0
Major complications up to 6 weeks that cause the patient to seek treatment from health care providers. They are wound infection, prosthesis infection, joint dislocation, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, acute myocardial infarct, transient ischaemia attack, stroke, acute kidney injury, acute pulmonary oedema, exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease.
Measured by patient self-report at 6 week telephone call. All reports of the above complications will be confirmed with the treating doctor or hospital.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
318031
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
318031
0
Week 6 postoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
318032
0
Hospital readmission - measured by patient self-report at 6 week telephone call. All reports of readmissions will be confirmed with the treating hospital.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
318032
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
318032
0
up to 6 weeks postoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
318033
0
Adherence to the ERAS bundle, measured for each patient in the ERAS (exposed) group. This is preoperative patient information, reduced fasting from oral intake preoperatively and postoperatively, standardised anaesthetic technique (spinal and propofol sedation or general anaesthesia), intraoperative forced air and fluid warmers, regular postoperative multimodal oral analgesia, regular intraoperative and postoperative antiemetics, antibiotic prophylaxis, thromboprophylaxis, regular postoperative aperients, standardised physiotherapy mobilisation plan.
This information is collected on the patient's Case Report Form, from patient self-report, contemporaneous intraoperative data and review of drug charts and hospital medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
318033
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
318033
0
Day of discharge
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patients over the age of 18 years at time of THR.
2. Patients undergoing unilateral THR.
3. Patients who can independently complete the study questionnaires.
4. Patients who have provided written informed consent.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patients who have previously been enrolled in the study at any time.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
None
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
None
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
This is a prospective interventional study using a before-and-after design, with two groups of patients. The first group of patients receiving the existing standard of care (pre-intervention group) will act as a historical control group for the second ‘post-intervention’ group of patients.
Data was collected from the preintervention (comparator) group from January to September 2015. Data from the post intervention group will commence in October 2015.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Data will be analysed using contemporary regression methods intended for longitudinal data, allowing for potential confounders such as age, gender and possible differences between the groups. Logistic regression will be employed for binary outcomes such as whether or not day 0 mobilization was possible, robust or median regression for variables with skewed distributions such as length of stay. Tests of statistical significance will be 2 tailed, and employ a criteria of p <= 0.05. 95% confidence intervals will be reported throughout.
No interim analysis is planned.
The sample size of each group is estimated to be 100 per group, assuming 80% statistical power, 0.05 level of statistical significance and a standardized difference between the pre and post-ERAS groups on mean QoR-15 at 6 week follow-up (where maximum change would be expected) of 0.40 of a standard deviation, slightly under the effect size conventionally regarded as ‘medium’.. Calculations were performed using SAS Power and Sample Size 13.1. The expected effect size is a conservative one, suggested by examination of the literature and discussion with the developer of the QoR-15. A 6 point difference in QoR-15 at 6 weeks postoperatively is a clinically significant difference, with an estimated standard deviation of 15 (data from the first phase will be used to calculate SD). Allowing for 10% attrition 111 patients, conservatively rounded to 115, per group would be required.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
8/01/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/04/2016
Query!
Actual
22/06/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
3/08/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
230
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
230
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
4421
0
Epworth Richmond - Richmond
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
10634
0
3121 - Richmond
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
292159
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
292159
0
Epworth Richmond
Query!
Address [1]
292159
0
89 Bridge Rd
Richmond
Vic 3121
Query!
Country [1]
292159
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
292160
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
292160
0
Medacta
Query!
Address [2]
292160
0
Unit F37, 16 Mars Road
Lane Cove West
Sydney NSW 2066
Query!
Country [2]
292160
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Nicole Tan
Query!
Address
Anaesthetic Services
Suite 3.4, The Epworth Centre
32 Erin St
Richmond
Vic 3121
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
290835
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
290835
0
None
Query!
Address [1]
290835
0
None
Query!
Country [1]
290835
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
293635
0
Epworth HealthCare
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
293635
0
Ground Floor, Pelaco Building Two 21-31 Goodwood Street Richmond Vic 3121
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
293635
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
293635
0
10/11/2014
Query!
Approval date [1]
293635
0
20/11/2014
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
293635
0
LR146-14
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Patients who undergo total hip replacement surgery traditionally have long surgical incisions, routine urinary catheters and wound drain tubes. Anesthesia involves 12 hours of oral restriction before and after surgery, a combination of local anesthetic blocks, spinal anaesthesia and sedation or general anesthesia. After surgery, patients have varying degrees of immobilization to avoid the risk of early hip dislocation and opioid pain relief which results in slow recovery and hospital discharge at day 4-6. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles for joint replacement surgery involve patient education, less invasive surgery, reduced fasting, regular oral analgesia and early ambulation. These principles are packaged together in a ‘bundle’ individualised for a particular hospital unit to account for local practices and preferences. Most ERAS programs have shown a remarkable improvement in patient recovery after joint replacement as measured by decreased hospital length of stay, improved mobilisation and patient satisfaction, with no increase in complications. This study aims to implement and evaluate a tailored ERAS program at Epworth HealthCare, a large private hospital with patients undergoing one-sided THR surgery by a single surgeon. Patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated from the time they are seen in the hospital preoperatively to discharge and followed up by a telephone call at 6 weeks. WHODAS 2.0 and QoR-15 questionnaires will assess patients’ return to health. The recovery of this group of patients will be compared to the recovery of a group of patients who underwent THR before the ERAS program was implemented.
Query!
Trial website
None
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
60790
0
Dr Nicole Tan
Query!
Address
60790
0
Anaesthetic Services
Suite 3.4, The Epworth Centre
32 Erin St
Richmond
Vic 3121
Query!
Country
60790
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
60790
0
+61394277899
Query!
Fax
60790
0
Query!
Email
60790
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
60791
0
Donna McCallum
Query!
Address
60791
0
Ground Floor
Smorgon Institute for Education and Research at Epworth
185-187 Hoddle Street
Richmond VIC 3121
Query!
Country
60791
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
60791
0
+61399368067
Query!
Fax
60791
0
Query!
Email
60791
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
60792
0
Nicole Tan
Query!
Address
60792
0
Anaesthetic Services
Suite 3.4, The Epworth Centre
32 Erin St
Richmond
Vic 3121
Query!
Country
60792
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
60792
0
+61394277899
Query!
Fax
60792
0
Query!
Email
60792
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Does implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for hip replacement improve quality of recovery in an Australian private hospital: A quality improvement study.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0525-5
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF