Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000097448
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/11/2015
Date registered
29/01/2016
Date last updated
29/01/2016
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing the efficacy and safety between Propofol And Dexmedetomidine for sedation in claustrophobic Adults undergoing Magnetic resonance imaging (PADAM)
Query!
Scientific title
A randomized controlled trial comparing target controlled infusion (TCI) propofol versus dexmedetomidine infusion for the treatment of anxiety in claustrophobic adults undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287784
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1176-1680
Query!
Trial acronym
PADAM
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Claustrophobia in adults
296669
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
296895
296895
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Mental Health
297055
297055
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Recruitment steps:
1. Patients were recruited from the MRI room or registry.
2. Recruited patients were slotted into a designated time for research studies under the bio-imaging department or following their original date and time of appointment depending on which one would be earlier or convenient to the patients.
4. Patients were explained the risks and purpose of study and written informed consent was taken prior to procedure.
5. Following the trial number, patients were randomized to either:
Group A: The attending anaesthetist would administer Propofol (10mg/ml) infusion, using Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) with Schnider’s pharmacokinetic model for target effect site. Drug boluses and infusions are administered according to ideal bodyweight. TCI infusion was started at a rate of 1.5 mcg/kg until the steady state was achieved then titrated with increment of 0.1mcg/kg to achieve Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) of 3.
OR
Group B: The attending anaesthetist would administer Dexmedetomidine (4mcg/ml) infusion and administered according to ideal bodyweight. Loading dose of 1mcg/kg/min was given within 10 minutes and infusion was started at the rate of 0.2mcg/kg/hr and titrated by increment of 0.1mcg/kg/hr and above to achieve RSS of 3. Dosing was instituted according to the dexmedetomidine (Precedex) guidelines.
It was a double-blinded study whereby both patients and the attending radiographer (the same person who would perform the Spielberg Anxiety and Visual Anxiety Scores).
On the day of the re-scheduled MRI scan:
1. Patient was fasted for at least 6 hours before the scheduled scan.
2. No premed was given.
3. An Intravenous cannula (20-22G) was inserted to start 500mls of crystalloid as fluid maintenance.
4. Patient entered the scanning room for 5 minutes before being asked to answer the Spielberger Straits Traits Anxiety Score and Visual Anxiety Score to determine their anxiety levels pre-examination by the attending radiolographer.
5. Standard monitoring with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), heart rate, Pulse Oxymetry and electrocardiogram (ECG) was applied, monitored and recorded throughout the scan.
6. Oxygen 3L/min via nasal prong was given to the subjects.
7. A fully equipped emergency trolley and airway management was on standby in the MRI room vicinity at all times.
8. The sedative agent according to the randomized group was given intravenously and titrated until patient achieved RSS of 3.
9. Time when the drug infusion started and the time taken to achieve RSS score of 3 were recorded.
10. Once RSS of 3 was achieved, patient entered the MRI tunnel.
11. Any failed scans were recorded and reasons documented.
12. Adverse events during the scan such as
i) Drop in blood pressure > 20% from baseline or requires vasopressors
ii) Bradycardia <50 beats per min
iii) Desaturation < 95% requiring airway and ventilation support
iv) Over sedation
were recorded and managed appropriately by the attending anaesthetist.
After the scan:
1. Patient was monitored in the recovery bay.
2. After 5 minutes in recovery, patient was asked again to answer the Spielberger Straits Traits Anxiety Score and Visual Anxiety Score to determine their anxiety levels post examination by the same attending radiographer.
3. Vital signs and sedation scores were recorded for every half an hour until ready for discharge.
4. Any side effects or complications including hypotension, bradycardia or respiratory instability were managed accordingly.
5. The patient will be allowed home by the anaesthetist once all discharge criteria were fulfilled:
v) Fully conscious
vi) Hemodynamically stable
vii) Able to perform physical activity without support or with minimal support.
viii) No nausea or vomiting
6. Before going home, patient was asked to fill in a Patient Satisfaction Score form.
7. All data collected was analyzed statistically using SPSS.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
293175
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
dexmedetomidine
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
296502
0
Anxiety assessed using the Visual Anxiety Score and Speilberger Straits Test Anxiety Inventory score taken in the MRI scanner and after completing the MRI scan
Query!
Assessment method [1]
296502
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
296502
0
Before the start of the sedation and after completion of procedure.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
296503
0
The number of patients who were unable to complete the MRI
Query!
Assessment method [2]
296503
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
296503
0
anytime from start until completion of MRI
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
318627
0
i) To compare patient’s satisfaction using Visual Satisfaction Score chart.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
318627
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
318627
0
Time just before discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
318628
0
To document number of adverse events in both groups during the scans such as
i) Drop in blood pressure > 20% from baseline or requires vasopressors
ii) Bradycardia <50 beats per min
iii) Desaturation < 95% requiring airway and ventilation support
iv) Over sedation
Query!
Assessment method [2]
318628
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
318628
0
start of sedation until discharge
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. ASA I - II according to American Society of Anaesthesiologist guidelines.
2. Patients age 18 - 70 years old.
3. Known case of claustrophobia or history of anxiety/panic attack during an MRI study
4. Patients who were scheduled to undergo an MRI scan for a medical or surgical problem
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patient related - Patient refusal
BMI >30
Hypotension due to any reasons. (Systolic less than 90 mmHg)
Bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 bpm)
Concurrent medication which increase vagal tone or delay AV conduction (e.g.. digoxin / beta blocker)
Chronic lung disease with saturation on room air <91%
Obstructive sleep apnoea
Requires general anaesthesia
2. Drug related - Allergic history to propofol or dexmedetomidine or related compound
3. MRI related - Any contraindications to MRI
Emergency MRI
Interventional procedures
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
A research assistant will organize the randomization for 30 subjects using an online randomization table, label the group numbers 1 or 2 and seal the numbers in opaque envelopes.
An anaesthetist will screen for suitable subjects and once consent was obtained, the sealed envelopes will be opened prior to starting the MRI procedure.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample Size:
A total of 30 patients as subjects with n=15 in each arm were recruited. Calculation of sample size was done using G Power Software by UCLA University. The effect size difference was estimated at 0.6 using a dependent t-test based on objective 1. To achieve a=0.05 and power (1-ß) >80%, total sample size calculated was 24. An estimation of 20% drop out rate made the total sample size to be a final 30.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/10/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/09/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
30
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
7291
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [1]
7291
0
Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
292317
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
292317
0
Postgraduate Research Fund University of Malaya
Query!
Address [1]
292317
0
Institute of Postgraduate Studies
University of Malaya
50603 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
Query!
Country [1]
292317
0
Malaysia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Pui-San Loh
Query!
Address
Department of Anaesthesiology,
Faculty of Medicine
University Malaya
Lembah Pantai
50603 Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country
Malaysia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
290995
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
290995
0
Query!
Address [1]
290995
0
Query!
Country [1]
290995
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
293789
0
MEDICAL ETHICS COMMITTEE UNIVERSITY MALAYA MEDICAL CENTER
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
293789
0
UNIVERSITY MALAYA MEDICAL CENTER JALAN LEMBAH PANTAI 59100, KUALA LUMPUR
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
293789
0
Malaysia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
293789
0
06/08/2014
Query!
Approval date [1]
293789
0
20/08/2014
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
293789
0
MECID NO:20148-432 , NMRR 14-1260-22799
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Magnetic Resonant Imaging (MRI) is now widely used in clinical investigations. However, because of the design of MRI, patients are required to lie still in an enclosed tunnel like machine for some time. This poses a great challenge to patients who are claustrophobic. Most of these individuals will require sedation to reduce their anxiety in order to tolerate and complete the scan. Traditionally, benzodiazepines are the most frequently used dugs for sedation but now, more drugs with reliable and predictable pharmacological profiles are available such as propofol and dexmedetomidine. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol and dexmedetomidine as sedation to reduce the anxiety levels of claustrophobic adults undergoing MRI. This is a prospective randomized double-blinded study involving 30 adult claustrophobic patients planned for elective MRI for a medical or surgical reason in University Malaya Medical Center, Malaysia. Each group will be equal in numbers with group A receiving Propofol via Target Controlled Infusion using Schneider Model and Group B receiving Dexmedetomidine given by the attending anaesthetist. Anxiety levels will be assessed with Visual Anxiety Score (VAS) and Spielberger Straits Test Anxiety (STAI) Score taken before the drug was given and after completing the MRI scan. Adverse effects occurring during the sedation will be documented together with patient satisfaction scores before they go home.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
61306
0
Dr Pui-San Loh
Query!
Address
61306
0
Department of Anaesthesiology,
Faculty of Medicine,
University of Malaya,
Lembah Pantai,
50603 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Query!
Country
61306
0
Malaysia
Query!
Phone
61306
0
+60379492052
Query!
Fax
61306
0
Query!
Email
61306
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
61307
0
Mohamad Azlan bin Ariffin
Query!
Address
61307
0
Department of Anaesthesiology,
Faculty of Medicine,
University of Malaya,
Lembah Pantai,
50603 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Query!
Country
61307
0
Malaysia
Query!
Phone
61307
0
+60379492052
Query!
Fax
61307
0
Query!
Email
61307
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
61308
0
Pui-San Loh
Query!
Address
61308
0
Department of Anaesthesiology,
Faculty of Medicine,
University of Malaya,
Lembah Pantai,
50603 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Query!
Country
61308
0
Malaysia
Query!
Phone
61308
0
+60379492052
Query!
Fax
61308
0
Query!
Email
61308
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF