Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000115437
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/11/2015
Date registered
2/02/2016
Date last updated
2/02/2016
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Effectiveness of an individualized physiotherapy program versus group therapy in acute and subacute mechanical neck pain
Query!
Scientific title
Effectiveness of an individualized physiotherapy program versus group therapy on neck pain, disability, range of motion and quality of life in patients with acute and subacute mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287783
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1175-2731
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Acute and subacute mechanical neck pain
296671
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
296893
296893
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
296894
296894
0
0
Query!
Physiotherapy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Individualized program; program conducted by a qualified physiotherapist during three weeks at 5 sessions a week in a one-on-one consultation for 45 minutes each sesssion.
1.- Surface thermotherapy, infrared for 15 minutes, at a distance of 50 cm from the source of emission.
2.- Therapeutic massage in neck area in the following pattern:
- Surface effleurage for 5 minutes.
- Deep friction for 5 minutes
- Petrissage for 5 minutes
- Surface effleurage for 5 minutes.
3.- Specific/analitic stretching in the following pattern on the muscles affected (trapezius, right and left, and levator scapular, right and left) :
- First, start stretching slowly and softly.
- Second, maintain the stretching
- Third, relaxing slowly
- Forth, keep the position for 15 seconds.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
293174
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Group therapy/control group; program carried out by a quilified physiotherapist for the whole group.
1.- Relaxing exercises by means of abdominal breathing, for 5 minutes.
2.- Trapezius and levator scapular auto-stretching exercises maintaining each position during five seconds. This section includes 4 exercises. Each exercise was perfomed in series of repetitions, so that three series of three repetitions were executed.
Exercise 1.- Up and down shoulders.
Exercise 2.- Flexion and extension of the neck
Exercise 3.- Left and right neck rotation
Exercise 4.- Left and right neck lateroflexion
3.- Isometric neck exercises, using the patient´s hand resistance, in the following pattern, (three series with three repetitions, each one for 6 seconds):
Exercise 1.- Neck flexion, resisted in forehead
Exercise 2.- Neck extension, resisted in occipital area
Exercise 3.- Neck sidebending, resisted in
tempoparietal area (left and right)
Exercise 4.- From a neck rotation of 30 degrees, try to flex it
towards the homolateral shoulder. Repeat
in the other side.
4.- Ergonomic education in a session during 45 minutes, on postural hygiene standards in daily life activities. This session was carried out by a quilified physiotherapist for the whole group as a masterclass.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
296499
0
Neck pain, assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and algometry in the following muscles´ trigger points: trapezius and levator scapular, in both sides.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
296499
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
296499
0
At baseline and after the intervention (15 sesssions during three weeks)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
296500
0
Disability, assessed using the Neck Disability Index
Query!
Assessment method [2]
296500
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
296500
0
At baseline and after the intervention (15 sesssions during three weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
318625
0
- Range of neck motion, measured with inclinometer
Query!
Assessment method [1]
318625
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
318625
0
At baseline and after the intervention (15 sesssions during three weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
318626
0
Quality of life, assessed with SF-12
Query!
Assessment method [2]
318626
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
318626
0
At baseline and after the intervention (15 sesssions during three weeks)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients diagnosed of mechanical neck pain from the Dr. Fleming Public Medical Center, under 7 weeks of evolution (pain with an evolution of less than 7 weeks), with a correct mental stage to understand the requirements of the study and without any pharmacological treatment.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Neck pain with neurogical and/or discal signs
- Ostheoporosis
- Inflamatory diseases
- Previous neck surgery
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The patients from the Dr. Fleming Medical Center were received by the main researcher who confirmed their elegibility to participate in the study.
After signing the informed consent and the initial assessment, patients were randomly allocated to groups (individualized and groupal) and with concealed allocation by means of sealed opaque envelopes.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomization using 90 sealed opaque envelopes procedure, 45 for individual treatment and 45 for groupal treatment. Each patient choosed one envelope specifying the group in which was allocated.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The sample size was calculated with the G Power 3.0 program, the following parameters were selected depending on the type of study: one tail hipothesis, a large effect size (0.8), and a probabilistic alpha error of 0, 05.
n = 35 subjects for each study group was/were obtained as sample size. The sample was increased in a 30% in order to considering possible drop-outs, being n = 90 (45 in each group) the final sample.
The recorded data were processed using SPSS v.17.0 for Windows. All the variables were checked by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to know the normal distribution.
Subsequently, descriptive analysis of the variables of the study (pre and posttest) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed.
Finally, to compare the effectiveness of both treatments, U Mann-Whitney test was conducted.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
15/01/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/11/2013
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
90
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
90
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
7290
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [1]
7290
0
Seville
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
292316
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
292316
0
Centro de Especilaidades Dr. Fleming. Area Sanitaria Hospital Virgen del Rocio.
Query!
Address [1]
292316
0
c/ Juan de Padilla, n. 8
41005 Sevilla
Query!
Country [1]
292316
0
Spain
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Research Group CTS-305
Query!
Address
c/ Avicena s/s
41009 Sevilla
Query!
Country
Spain
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
290994
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
290994
0
Query!
Address [1]
290994
0
Query!
Country [1]
290994
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
293788
0
Comite Etico de Experimentacion de la Universidad de Sevilla
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
293788
0
Unknown
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
293788
0
Spain
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
293788
0
19/01/2011
Query!
Approval date [1]
293788
0
22/03/2011
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
293788
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Introduction: Mechanical neck pain is one of the most common diseases, which has important implications for both, health and labor sector. Due to the heavy workload, the health authorities argue that its physiotherapy treatment should be performed in a group, rather than in a personalized way, how it has been done so far. The aim of this study is to know which of these two modalities of treatment is the most effective to improve this health problem. Material and Methods: Our study is a randomized and controlled clinical trial, with two groups formed by simple chance, 90 subjects (45 per group) were included: 69 women (76.7%) and 21 men (23.3%) of 20-52 years (mean 39.50 and standard deviation 9.05). Personalized treatment was applied in one group and group treatment in the other one, both during 15 sessions. The following variables were measured at the beginning and the end of the treatment (pre and posttreatment): pain with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and algometer on trapezius and levator sacapula’s trigger points; cervical joint range with inclinometer; neck disability with Neck Disability Index; and quality of life with SF-12 questionnaire. Data analysis were made by Wilcoxon signed ranks test and U Mann-Whitney test. A significance level of p <0.05 was considered. Results: In personalized treatment group Wilcoxon test showed a significant decrease in pain and disability index and an increase in joint range and quality of life (p> 0.05). Group treatment patients showed significant, but very small (not clinically relevant), differences between pretest and posttest values for all variables (p <0.05). The comparison between the two groups showed significant differences in favor of personalized treatment in all variables (p <0.05) with a high or moderate effect size.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
633
633
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/369564-Ethical approval.pdf
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
61314
0
Dr Maria de la Casa Almeida
Query!
Address
61314
0
Facultad de Enfermeria, Fisioterapia y Podologia. Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento Fisioterapia.
C/ Avicena s/n
41009 Sevilla
Query!
Country
61314
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
61314
0
+34654217360
Query!
Fax
61314
0
Query!
Email
61314
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
61315
0
Maria de la Casa Almeida
Query!
Address
61315
0
Facultad de Enfermeria, Fisioterapia y Podologia. Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento Fisioterapia.
C/ Avicena s/n
41009 Sevilla
Query!
Country
61315
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
61315
0
+34654217360
Query!
Fax
61315
0
Query!
Email
61315
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
61316
0
Carmen Maria Suarez Serrano
Query!
Address
61316
0
Facultad de Enfermeria, Fisioterapia y Podologia. Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento Fisioterapia.
C/ Avicena s/n
41009 Sevilla
Query!
Country
61316
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
61316
0
+34616439514
Query!
Fax
61316
0
Query!
Email
61316
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF