Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000037404
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
23/11/2015
Date registered
19/01/2016
Date last updated
8/08/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Low Intensity Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in women Exposed to Adversity
Query!
Scientific title
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Problem Management Plus versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in women Exposed to Adversity
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287971
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Depression
296848
0
Query!
Anxiety
296849
0
Query!
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
296850
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
297078
297078
0
0
Query!
Depression
Query!
Mental Health
297079
297079
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Mental Health
297080
297080
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
There are two arms to this trial. Arm 1: Group Problem Management Plus. Arm 2: Enhanced Treatment as Usual. Therapy is administered once weekly over 5 weeks in a group format over 3 hours per session. Problem Management Plus includes skills in identifying emotional and practical problems that can be managed and strategies to reduce and cope with these problems. The duration of the study for any participant will conclude after 3 months follow-up assessment and resulting in participation duration of around 5 months. Therapy is provided by lay health counselors along with community health workers. Fidelity testing of 10-15% sessions will be done in the field.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
293314
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [2]
293315
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Enhanced Treatment as Usual comprises normal routine visits conducted by the local community health workers (LHWs). Care is enhanced in 2 ways: (a) LHWs in the EUC arm will receive training in making referrals to their primary care physicians for treatment; and (b) These primary care physicians will receive the standard training in treatment of common mental disorders routinely taught by our partner, the WHO Collaborating Center in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. If, during this treatment or during the study’s assessments participants in EUC arm show severe psychiatric disorders (eg psychosis) or problems (e.g., suicidality) that require immediate specialist treatment and follow-up, they will be referred to specialist staff (e.g., psychiatrist) within the District Headquarter Hospital. The duration of the study for any participant will conclude after post-trial follow-up assessment, resulting in participation duration of 5 months.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
296684
0
Anxiety as measured by mean scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
296684
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
296684
0
Pretreatment (week 1), 1st follow up posttreatment (week 7)and final follow up (week 20)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
296685
0
Depression as measured by mean scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
296685
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
296685
0
Pretreatment (week 1), 1st follow up posttreatment (week 7) and final follow up (week 20)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
299214
0
Anxiety and depression as measured by the combined mean scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Query!
Assessment method [3]
299214
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
299214
0
Pretreatment (week 1), 1st follow up posttreatment (week 7)and final follow up (week 20)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
319116
0
Functioning as measured by means scores on the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319116
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319116
0
Pretreatment (week 1), 1st follow up posttreatment (week 7) and final follow up (week 20)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
319117
0
Posttraumatic stress disorder as measured by means scores on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist
Query!
Assessment method [2]
319117
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
319117
0
Pretreatment (week 1), 1st follow up posttreatment (week 7) and final follow up (week 20)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
319393
0
Cost-effectiveness as measured by the Service Receipt Inventory
Query!
Assessment method [3]
319393
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
319393
0
Pretreatment (Week 1) and final follow up (Week 20)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
326531
0
Levels of social support measured by the Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Query!
Assessment method [4]
326531
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
326531
0
Pretreatment (Week 1) and final follow up (Week 20)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
326532
0
Depressive disorder measured by the Primary Health Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [5]
326532
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
326532
0
Pretreatment (week 1), 1st follow up posttreatment (week 7) and final follow up (week 20)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
326533
0
Self-report wellbeing as measured by the Psychological Outcomes Profile Instrument (PSYCHLOPS)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
326533
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
326533
0
Pretreatment (week 1), 1st follow up posttreatment (week 7) and final follow up (week 20)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
GHQ >2 and WHODAS>16
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
(a) Imminent suicidal intent, (b) severe mental disorder, (c) severe cognitive impairment.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Participants will be women 18-60 years screened in the community by the research team indicating moderate distress & impaired functioning. As a cluster randomized control trial the unit of randomization is LHWs, who each have one catchment area of approximately 150 homes or a population of 1,000 persons. All LHWs in Odigram and Ghalegay are eligible for randomization, which will be done by a researcher at the independent trial center at the Human Development Research Foundation who is not involved in intervention delivery, clinical supervision, independent assessment or other aspects of the day-to-day running of the study. Within the Odigram and Ghalegay Union Council an even number of LHWs will be randomized to the intervention and EUC arm, using a 1:1 allocation ratio. This design is necessary to reduce the chance of contamination that would be present in an individual RCT design as it is possible more than one woman from each household will meet the inclusion criteria.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomization will be conducted by a computer generated system and will be conducted using 1:1 allocation ratio.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
11/01/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
21/08/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/12/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
612
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
612
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
7354
0
Pakistan
Query!
State/province [1]
7354
0
Swat/Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
292440
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
292440
0
Elrha
Query!
Address [1]
292440
0
1 St John's Lane,London EC1M 4AR
Query!
Country [1]
292440
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name
Human Development Research Foundation
Query!
Address
PO Box No. 759 G-10 Markaz Islamabad, 44000 Pakistan
Query!
Country
Pakistan
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
291133
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
291133
0
Query!
Address [1]
291133
0
Query!
Country [1]
291133
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
293899
0
Research and Ethical Committee (REC) Rawalpindi Medical College
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
293899
0
Tipu road, Rawalpindi. Post code 46000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
293899
0
Pakistan
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
293899
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
293899
0
31/08/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
293899
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
293900
0
WHO Research Ethics Review Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
293900
0
20,AVENUEAPPIA–CH-1211GENEVA27–SWITZERLAND
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
293900
0
Switzerland
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
293900
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
293900
0
23/10/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
293900
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The rationale of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a low intensity intervention to reduce mental health problems in women in low-resources settings. This study compares the relative effectiveness of (a) Group Problem Management Plus, and (b) Enhanced Treatment as Usual. It is hypothesised that Group Problem Management Plus will lead to greater symptom reduction than Enhanced Treatment as Usual.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
61750
0
Prof Atif Rahman
Query!
Address
61750
0
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society University of Liverpool Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street Liverpool L69 3GL
Query!
Country
61750
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Phone
61750
0
+44(0)151 252 5509
Query!
Fax
61750
0
+44(0)151 252 5285
Query!
Email
61750
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
61751
0
Atif Rahman
Query!
Address
61751
0
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society University of Liverpool Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street Liverpool L69 3GL
Query!
Country
61751
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Phone
61751
0
+44(0)151 252 5509
Query!
Fax
61751
0
+44(0)151 252 5285
Query!
Email
61751
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
61752
0
Atif Rahman
Query!
Address
61752
0
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society University of Liverpool Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street Liverpool L69 3GL
Query!
Country
61752
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Phone
61752
0
+44(0)151 252 5509
Query!
Fax
61752
0
+44(0)151 252 5285
Query!
Email
61752
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group psychological intervention using cognitive behavioural strategies for women with common mental disorders in conflict-affected rural Pakistan: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
2017
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1905-8
Embase
Effectiveness of a brief group psychological intervention for women in a post-conflict setting in Pakistan: a single-blind, cluster, randomised controlled trial.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2818%2932343-2
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF